2026-02-28 Iran War - Israel and USA strikes Iran - "Preemptive Strike"

[Irongrip400]

If you voted for Trump and now say this isn’t what you voted for then you clearly didn’t pay attention. Saying this once again, he’s been saying it for 40 years and three election cycles. The only thing that changed is he did what the previous 6 Presidents (except Biden, he was never President) said they would do but didn’t…he kept a campaign promise and it just pisses people off.

Gonna say Stolen Valor Barry will be following up after not posting for a couple of days

Please explain to me how this is what I voted for, there’s no amount of pretzel logic that gets that argument across.


He’s also a lame duck president, not in the sense he’s not doing anything, but in the sense he doesn’t care what happens after he leaves office. Republicans get crushed in the mid terms? “Who cares I’m gone.” He probably on some level wants that to happen because they didn’t bow to him on everything. The dude has done some good, don’t get me wrong. But, the tranny blue haired gender woke shit is going to come back ten fold after he’s gone because of his actions in his second term.

[Coach is Back!]

Please explain to me how this is what I voted for, there’s no amount of pretzel logic that gets that argument across.


He’s also a lame duck president, not in the sense he’s not doing anything, but in the sense he doesn’t care what happens after he leaves office. Republicans get crushed in the mid terms? “Who cares I’m gone.” He probably on some level wants that to happen because they didn’t bow to him on everything. The dude has done some good, don’t get me wrong. But, the tranny blue haired gender woke shit is going to come back ten fold after he’s gone because of his actions in his second term.

I did explain it….several times very clearly.

As far as getting crushed in the mid-terms. The only way we get crushed in the midterms is if republicans don’t turn out to vote and so far what I’m seeing just on here is that because some of you thought this wasn’t what you voted for it usually means you won’t be showing up to vote anyway.

The Liberal Democrats have not just doubled down on what they lost on in 24’, they’ve got worse. Nothing has changed, they’re not coming to the middle, they’re not negotiating they own two of the longest government shut downs in the history of this country, it took Trump to use the funding from the BBB to pay TSA workers, etc

In a little over a year he’s made good on his campaign promises INCLUDING Iran. So to say he’s a “lame duck” president that doesn’t care because this is his last term isn’t correct whatsoever. Why? Because he wants his MAGA agenda to be carried over for the next republican administration. Do you actually think when he leaves office that’s it and he’s just going to ride off into sunset? Besides the left that’s going to try and prosecute and run him through hell like they did before, he’ll still be the face of the Republican Party, bar none.

[Grape Ape]

He’s also a lame duck president, not in the sense he’s not doing anything, but in the sense he doesn’t care what happens after he leaves office. Republicans get crushed in the mid terms? “Who cares I’m gone.”

I don't think you are thinking about this correctly.

If he loses the House and Senate, they will block his entire agenda, impeach, etc....

He absolutely cares about that.

[chaos]

I don't think you are thinking about this correctly.

If he loses the House and Senate, they will block his entire agenda, impeach, etc....

He absolutely cares about that.

Then he should act like it.

[Super Nattie]

Netanyahu's son continues to enjoy Miami Beach while more US soldiers are on their way to Iran.

[Irongrip400]

Netanyahu's son continues to enjoy Miami Beach while more US soldiers are on their way to Iran.

Looks like a fag.

[Rambone]

Coach is right. Anybody who didn’t expect the U.S. to attack Iran should’ve known better since he clearly campaigned on it. Millions that feel betrayed are too dumb to realize that’s what they voted for. Somehow Coach is the only one smart enough to know what his vote meant. Surely Trump’s latest toilet bowl approval ratings indicate that the President of Peace has kept up with his campaign promises of his American First agenda.

[Grape Ape]

Then he should act like it.

I have not read all the details and minutia around this.

Is it accepted that Iran had 60% enriched Uranium, and missiles that had much longer range than they said, or is that point in dispute?

[Grape Ape]

Coach is right. Anybody who didn’t expect the U.S. to attack Iran should’ve known better since he clearly campaigned on it. Millions that feel betrayed are too dumb to realize that’s what they voted for. Somehow Coach is the only one smart enough to know what his vote meant. Surely Trump’s latest toilet bowl approval ratings indicate that the President of Peace has kept up with his campaign promises of his American First agenda.

Not getting in the middle of it, but Michael Malice said recently a lot of folks who voted Trump were like brides who prepared for the wedding but not the marriage.

Meaning, they were not ready of how ugly it would be to accomplish the goals set out (especially interior deportations).  Now you could argue, for sure, he said no new wars (or no new forever wars), but he's also said Iran will never be nuclear.

Can see both sides here.

[Rambone]

Not getting in the middle of it, but Michael Malice said recently a lot of folks who voted Trump were like brides who prepared for the wedding but not the marriage.

Meaning, they were not ready of how ugly it would be to accomplish the goals set out (especially interior deportations).  Now you could argue, for sure, he said no new wars (or no new forever wars), but he's also said Iran will never be nuclear.

Can see both sides here.

Saying “nuclear” is moving the goal posts. He almost always spoke of them not obtaining a nuclear weapon. Now they’re trying to use enrichment to justify the attacks. It’s a joke. Trump’s hardcore base prior to the summer Iran nuclear facility attacks polled below. Nobody voted for this except for the Zionist neocons and the low-IQ people they can easily brainwash (see Coach above).

[Grape Ape]

Saying “nuclear” is moving the goal posts. He almost always spoke of them not obtaining a nuclear weapon. Now they’re trying to use enrichment to justify the attacks. It’s a joke. Trump’s hardcore base prior to the summer Iran nuclear facility attacks polled below. Nobody voted for this except for the Zionist neocons and the low-IQ people they can easily brainwash (see Coach above).

I am aware of its unpopularity. And can't stand Graham, etc.

But if Iran had enriched uranium to 60%, is that not a potential threat?

Or, like I asked prior to the Malice quote, are people disputing they had this?

[Rambone]

I am aware of its unpopularity. And can't stand Graham, etc.

But if Iran had enriched uranium to 60%, is that not a potential threat?

Or, like I asked prior to the Malice quote, are people disputing they had this?

I think the people have woken up to fact that Israel’s acting like the Boy Who Cried Wolf. They’ve been saying that they were an imminent nuclear threat for what? 30 years? Americans are sick of this WMD BS that got us involved in Iraq the same way. I think 99.9% voters didn’t have two regime changes from the President of Peace in a little more than a year on their bingo card (except Coach of course)

[Grape Ape]

I think the people have woken up to fact that Israel’s acting like the Boy Who Cried Wolf. They’ve been saying that they were an imminent nuclear threat for what? 30 years? They’re sick of this WMD BS that got us involved in Iraq the same way.

That's not what I'm asking though.

I am positive Israel played a role, especially with the timing.

However, if Iran had enriched to 60%, which has use other than being close to the 90% it takes to build a bomb, and had missiles that could reach the EU, how is that not a threat?

That's why I'm asking if the validity of that is in dispute, but that would clearly represent a threat.

[Rambone]

That's not what I'm asking though.

I am positive Israel played a role, especially with the timing.

However, if Iran had enriched to 60%, which has use other than being close to the 90% it takes to build a bomb, and had missiles that could reach the EU, how is that not a threat?

That's why I'm asking if the validity of that is in dispute, but that would clearly represent a threat.

It would require some proof other than heresay that they were planning on enriching above that because 60% isn’t considered weapons grade although close. Israel and the U.S. have incredible intel capabilities, and they haven’t shown any proof of them doing otherwise. Traitor Graham was personally training Bibi on how to convince Trump to attack. If there was stronger intel, no convincing by proxy homosexual senator would be necessary.

[Grape Ape]

It would require some proof other than heresay that they were planning on enriching above that because 60% isn’t considered weapons grade although close. Israel and the U.S. have incredible intel capabilities, and they haven’t shown any proof of them doing otherwise. Traitor Graham was personally training Bibi on how to convince Trump to attack. If there was stronger intel, no convincing by proxy homosexual senator would be necessary.

Ok, so we accept they had it at 60%.

There is literally no reason for that level outside of it being a stepping stone to 90%.

So, why did they have 60?

And, given that, why wait until it gets to weapons grade?

[joswift]

Ok, so we accept they had it at 60%.

There is literally no reason for that level outside of it being a stepping stone to 90%.

So, why did they have 60?

And, given that, why wait until it gets to weapons grade?

a nuclear power station to keep the fucking lights on

World police telling countries they cant have nuclear weapons, the pajeets of India have them FFS, they even have a space program and the silly kunts in UK government still send them millions in aid every year.

[Donny]

a nuclear power station to keep the fucking lights on

World police telling countries they cant have nuclear weapons, the pajeets of India have them FFS, they even have a space program and the silly kunts in UK government still send them millions in aid every year.

Nothing in politics is by accident

[Rambone]

Ok, so we accept they had it at 60%.

There is literally no reason for that level outside of it being a stepping stone to 90%.

So, why did they have 60?

And, given that, why wait until it gets to weapons grade?

Where did I accept that it was at 60%? It was a hypothetical that you brought up for the discussion. Maybe it is. My intel (Barry Casserole PI) doesn’t travel outside the good ol’ USA. Unfortunately I cannot trust the same agencies that previously gave us phony intel for another forever war in the Middle East.

[Grape Ape]

a nuclear power station to keep the fucking lights on

World police telling countries they cant have nuclear weapons, the pajeets of India have them FFS, they even have a space program and the silly kunts in UK government still send them millions in aid every year.

You don't need uranium at 60% to do that.  You need 3-5%. That is the whole point, bandy.

The pajeets of India aren't threatening to wipe entire countries off the map.

But if you think a nuclear Iran is fine and dandy, I guess that's like, your opinion man.  #thedudeabides

[Grape Ape]

Where did I accept that it was at 60%? It was a hypothetical that you brought up for the discussion. Maybe it is. My intel (Barry Casserole PI) doesn’t travel outside the good ol’ USA. Unfortunately I cannot trust the same agencies that previously gave us phony intel for another forever war in the Middle East.

I inferred it from this:

It would require some proof other than heresay that they were planning on enriching above that because 60% isn’t considered weapons grade although close.

I intrepreted the heresay part as being going beyond 60, not the 60 itself.

Go it, my bad there.

And I totally get the lack of trust after Iraq - that is completely warranted.

But I have not heard Iran deny it, and they did have the missile.

So therefore, I feel they were a threat, and I will wait the six weeks (two more).

[chaos]

I have not read all the details and minutia around this.

Is it accepted that Iran had 60% enriched Uranium, and missiles that had much longer range than they said, or is that point in dispute?

All I'm saying is that if he cares about losing the house and senate during midterms then he should understand that his supporters do not want another war for isreal. That is the popular take. Iran has been chanting death to America and a few weeks out from nuclear weapons my whole life, nothing new. Who told us they were at 60% enrichment? isreal? If he wants to keep the house and senate he should be focused on America first and doing what's best for Americans, not blindly following isreals orders.
  I'm with you on not being up on every detail around the invasion, but I'm of the mind that we shouldn't be there and if we are going to be there, it should be fast and violent, rebuild and gtfo.

[Necrosis]

I inferred it from this:

I intrepreted the heresay part as being going beyond 60, not the 60 itself.

Go it, my bad there.

And I totally get the lack of trust after Iraq - that is completely warranted.

But I have not heard Iran deny it, and they did have the missile.

So therefore, I feel they were a threat, and I will wait the six weeks (two more).

the intelligence community indicated that there was no imminent threat, not even the first time you guys bombed them. Remember Tulsi stating as much and trump saying she was wrong?

There is no credible evidence they were anywhere close to nuclear weapons. Plus after ripping up the agreement what right does Trump have to say that they cannot? it's ridiculous in principle.

It's a WMD situation all over again, another misstep for ulterior means.

[Irongrip400]

I am aware of its unpopularity. And can't stand Graham, etc.

But if Iran had enriched uranium to 60%, is that not a potential threat?

Or, like I asked prior to the Malice quote, are people disputing they had this?

By this logic we are still in conflict with north Korea and they not only have nukes but the capability of reaching us/allies. Are we attacking them?

This war is bullshit, and the analogy of the wedding/marriage is crap. It’s nice for word play, but this was never campaigned on.

[Grape Ape]

All I'm saying is that if he cares about losing the house and senate during midterms then he should understand that his supporters do not want another war for isreal. That is the popular take. Iran has been chanting death to America and a few weeks out from nuclear weapons my whole life, nothing new. Who told us they were at 60% enrichment? isreal? If he wants to keep the house and senate he should be focused on America first and doing what's best for Americans, not blindly following isreals orders.
  I'm with you on not being up on every detail around the invasion, but I'm of the mind that we shouldn't be there and if we are going to be there, it should be fast and violent, rebuild and gtfo.

This is what I'm going off.

In more recent contexts (2025–2026), U.S. officials like Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff have publicly stated that Iranian negotiators directly told them Iran possessed significant quantities (e.g., ~460 kg) of 60%-enriched uranium. However, the original production and capability claims originated from Iranian authorities.

 Like I said, if this is established, I am fine with a SHORT strike.  If this was horseshit, then it could be Iraq v2.

[Grape Ape]

the intelligence community indicated that there was no imminent threat, not even the first time you guys bombed them. Remember Tulsi stating as much and trump saying she was wrong?

There is no credible evidence they were anywhere close to nuclear weapons. Plus after ripping up the agreement what right does Trump have to say that they cannot? it's ridiculous in principle.

It's a WMD situation all over again, another misstep for ulterior means.

We're having an American conversation here.  I'll get to you after I take care our in-house stuff.