Author Topic: 2026-02-28 Iran War - Israel and USA strikes Iran - "Preemptive Strike"  (Read 256333 times)

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11557
Re: 2026-02-28 Iran War - Israel and USA strikes Iran - "Preemptive Strike"
« Reply #2325 on: May 14, 2026, 11:44:40 AM »
Four weeks ago, CENTCOM began implementing the blockade against ships entering and exiting Iran’s ports. As of today, American forces have redirected 67 commercial vessels, allowed 15 supporting humanitarian aid to pass, and disabled 4 to ensure compliance.

Earlier this week, CENTCOM forces ensured that 2 commercial vessels turned around to comply with the blockade after communicating via radio and firing warning shots from small arms, clearly demonstrating that U.S. enforcement remains in full effect.

https://x.com/centcom/status/2054582289179296075?s=46

On the economic side, Iran is losing over $500 million per day. Their inflation is nearly at 100%. They can’t make payrolls let alone sustain a country

Remind me again how we’re “losing”?


Lol you blockaded the blockade.

So stupid it's unbelievable.

This was your plan for the war? start a blockade on top of a blockade? lolololo

Cripple the world economy and drive prices up for the next year at least. Well done. Iran still has the enriched uranium, there is no regime change, you guys now need 500 billion because of all the missiles you used and Iran posts videos mocking you daily lol.

You accomplished nothing and lost a shit ton.

honest

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3474
Re: 2026-02-28 Iran War - Israel and USA strikes Iran - "Preemptive Strike"
« Reply #2326 on: May 14, 2026, 01:35:11 PM »
Will be very interesting to see how much leverage Trump lost over China with Taiwan when they bombed Iran. Xi like Putin isn't a fan of the global double standard the US and Europe expects others to accept. You have too ask yourself after what Israel got Trump to do in Iran for them, could China convince him to sell out support for Taiwan similar. 

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 62600
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: 2026-02-28 Iran War - Israel and USA strikes Iran - "Preemptive Strike"
« Reply #2327 on: May 14, 2026, 07:45:40 PM »
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/israel-sue-new-york-times-over-article-rape-palestinian-detainees-netanyahu-says-2026-05-14/

This will be interesting. I don't see how it is a good move for Israel to do this. It reminds me of when Melania made that denial out of the blue, it is just calling more attention to it.
Isreal has been trying to get rid of free speech in America for years. Only a matter of time before aipac pays enough people off.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63151
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: 2026-02-28 Iran War - Israel and USA strikes Iran - "Preemptive Strike"
« Reply #2328 on: May 14, 2026, 08:07:52 PM »

Lol you blockaded the blockade.

So stupid it's unbelievable.

This was your plan for the war? start a blockade on top of a blockade? lolololo

Cripple the world economy and drive prices up for the next year at least. Well done. Iran still has the enriched uranium, there is no regime change, you guys now need 500 billion because of all the missiles you used and Iran posts videos mocking you daily lol.

You accomplished nothing and lost a shit ton.

What’s your solution? lol

ULTIMATEMUSCLEBEAR

  • Getbig I
  • *
  • Posts: 12
  • Getbig Historian
Re: 2026-02-28 Iran War - Israel and USA strikes Iran - "Preemptive Strike"
« Reply #2329 on: May 14, 2026, 11:53:06 PM »
coach todds anus should be used to shelter refugees from gaza

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11557
What’s your solution? lol

Well that would be assuming the reason they went there was legit, which I don't believe it was. If the initial reports were correct and they wiped out there nuclear program then I can't see how such a colossal failure of intelligence could occur where only a year later they are two weeks away when they indicated they were decades away.

Say they are that close to nuclear bombs, I would think a co-ordinated planned attack with our allies with contingencies for the straight amongst other things would have been apt. They rushed in with no plan and haven't achieved the nebulous objectives they haven't clearly elucidated. Overwhelming might with proper co-ordination and retrival of the enriched uranium (they don't appear to know where it is) with boots on the ground. I don't see how this has helped in any fashion. They don't have the uranium, they don't have a regime change and they appear to have been unprepared for the straights closure (or miscalculated).

The proper solution ime would likely be economic relief, lifting of sanctions, fostering good will and giving them something in return for reducing nuclear proliferation- that is what is going to happen now anyway. Obama's plan did at the time remove about 95% of the uranium, how that turned out is another question.I dont see how you can ask them to not have nukes when there mortal enemy does and sanction and economically devastate them at every turn.

So I think in all there were two options and they decided on rushing in (citing 2 weeks away which I think is silly) with no contingency and asking for help retroactively which is absurd. It was impulsive and directly related to your leaders capricious nature. He fired all the people that said it was a bad idea like a lunatic and went ahead anyway because HE wants to get the glory for "stopping" iran, he wants cuba, he wants more land....

Essentially, act like a rational, calculated adult instead of a tough guy teenage boy showing how macho he is.


If you are talking about the straight, suffer the defeat and start with concessions to get this saga over with and stop crippling the world economy. This shit is going to get worse and will last for well over a year. Iran can persist based on predictions for 6 months to a year with no oil going out, that would devastate the world economy. Even then, I am sure as that deadline approaches they will ramp up action not concede as they appear to be extremely prideful and being run by auotcrats do not seem to care about the pain it causes the people.


joswift

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39054
what gives NATO the right to tell a sovereign country it has no right to have a nuclear weapon?

I still haven't had a valid answer

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11557
what gives NATO the right to tell a sovereign country it has no right to have a nuclear weapon?

I still haven't had a valid answer

Nothing, particularly after you tear up an agreement on said nuclear weapons. The US have zero right to demand what they are demanding. They can start a war of course, which they have.

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 62600
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
what gives NATO the right to tell a sovereign country it has no right to have a nuclear weapon?

I still haven't had a valid answer
Nothing. They should let Eeron develop nuclear weapons and kill their neighbors. I'm all for it. Fuck the middle east. Eeron didn't comply with any agreement they made, so why not bomb the fuck out of them?
Since those are the only two choices, I say let them develop nukes, they won't get anywhere near the US. :)
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Donny

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20923
  • getbig Zen Master
Nothing. They should let Eeron develop nuclear weapons and kill their neighbors. I'm all for it. Fuck the middle east. Eeron didn't comply with any agreement they made, so why not bomb the fuck out of them?
Since those are the only two choices, I say let them develop nukes, they won't get anywhere near the US. :)
and i say think before you write  ::) subs can easily get in range to blow up your hick town

https://news.usni.org/2024/06/11/russian-nuclear-sub-frigate-with-long-range-land-attack-missiles-operating-off-east-coast

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 62600
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
and i say think before you write  ::) subs can easily get in range to blow up your hick town

https://news.usni.org/2024/06/11/russian-nuclear-sub-frigate-with-long-range-land-attack-missiles-operating-off-east-coast
You should be more worried about all the muzzies you let into your country. Why did you do that Donny??
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11557
Nothing. They should let Eeron develop nuclear weapons and kill their neighbors. I'm all for it. Fuck the middle east. Eeron didn't comply with any agreement they made, so why not bomb the fuck out of them?
Since those are the only two choices, I say let them develop nukes, they won't get anywhere near the US. :)

All the other countries that are in conflict with nukes seem to have not nuked each other. You think Iran isn't aware of mutually assured destruction? what nukes would do is prevent what is currently happening to them from happening though.

North korea is insane and haven't done shit.

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 27142
  • SC è un asino
All the other countries that are in conflict with nukes seem to have not nuked each other. You think Iran isn't aware of mutually assured destruction?

People blow themselves up over there all the time for martyrdom.

They don't think like normal folks.

Fanatics don't care about mutual destruction.
Y

illuminati

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26900
  • The Strongest Shall Survive.- - Lest we Forget.
People blow themselves up over there all the time for martyrdom.

They don't think like normal folks.

Fanatics don't care about mutual destruction.

That's beyond Pronoun Boy's comprehension.  ::)

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11557
People blow themselves up over there all the time for martyrdom.

They don't think like normal folks.

Fanatics don't care about mutual destruction.

Dude, you guys are like two steps away from being fanatics. Some of the christian right are absolutely looney.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11557
That's beyond Pronoun Boy's comprehension.  ::)

Ya because of all the high tech suicide martyrs that have existed. Using fucking dirty bombs and actual planes. You think they would have access to the fucking nukes? lol grow a brain.

The only country that has used a nuke is the US. They aren't retarded ffs. You guys are acting like they are some form of sub-human species instead of a civilization that has existed for a long time.

You have probably never been there or anywhere close to it I reckon. If north korea can have nukes, Iran can have nukes. Funny how you guys wouldn't start this shit with north korea because they would nuke you if you did lol. Kinda proves Irans point.

B_B_C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3054
  • change is the lot of all
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/15/20-years-is-enough-trump-puts-a-timeline-on-limiting-irans-nuclear-program-00923100?utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=RSS_Feed


By Alex Gangitano05/15/2026 08:37 AM EDT

BEIJING — President Donald Trump on Friday said a 20-year moratorium on Iran’s nuclear program would be enough for him to strike a deal and end the war.
The allowance for Iran to enrich uranium at any point in the future — even decades out — marks a shift for the president, who has repeatedly insisted that the country never be allowed to do so.
c

Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23181
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/05/15/20-years-is-enough-trump-puts-a-timeline-on-limiting-irans-nuclear-program-00923100?utm_campaign=RSS_Syndication&utm_medium=RSS&utm_source=RSS_Feed


By Alex Gangitano05/15/2026 08:37 AM EDT

BEIJING — President Donald Trump on Friday said a 20-year moratorium on Iran’s nuclear program would be enough for him to strike a deal and end the war.
The allowance for Iran to enrich uranium at any point in the future — even decades out — marks a shift for the president, who has repeatedly insisted that the country never be allowed to do so.

He’ll be dead by then, what does he care?

ProudVirgin69

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8092
  • hardcore redneck electric champion
Ahhh yes.   Civilians die in war and strikes.  Sad.  But a fact.    Another sad fact is that you don't seem to understand my accurate intelligence comment is relative to why we are doing it in the first place.  WMD claims?  Well that wasn't very accurate was it?  Ask Bush.   Nuclear weapons?  That is not very accurate when we "decimated" their program a year before is it?

GAYaos avoiding an IQ over his shoe size like he avoids heterosexuality and low carbs.

Ok, please explain the “accurate intelligence” that lead to the decision made by the Obama administration to repeatedly strike the Kunduz Hospital.  To a simpleton like me it seems like a war crime but I’m willing to have my mind changed.


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63151
  • It’s All Bullshit
Well that would be assuming the reason they went there was legit, which I don't believe it was. If the initial reports were correct and they wiped out there nuclear program then I can't see how such a colossal failure of intelligence could occur where only a year later they are two weeks away when they indicated they were decades away.

Say they are that close to nuclear bombs, I would think a co-ordinated planned attack with our allies with contingencies for the straight amongst other things would have been apt. They rushed in with no plan and haven't achieved the nebulous objectives they haven't clearly elucidated. Overwhelming might with proper co-ordination and retrival of the enriched uranium (they don't appear to know where it is) with boots on the ground. I don't see how this has helped in any fashion. They don't have the uranium, they don't have a regime change and they appear to have been unprepared for the straights closure (or miscalculated).

The proper solution ime would likely be economic relief, lifting of sanctions, fostering good will and giving them something in return for reducing nuclear proliferation- that is what is going to happen now anyway. Obama's plan did at the time remove about 95% of the uranium, how that turned out is another question.I dont see how you can ask them to not have nukes when there mortal enemy does and sanction and economically devastate them at every turn.

So I think in all there were two options and they decided on rushing in (citing 2 weeks away which I think is silly) with no contingency and asking for help retroactively which is absurd. It was impulsive and directly related to your leaders capricious nature. He fired all the people that said it was a bad idea like a lunatic and went ahead anyway because HE wants to get the glory for "stopping" iran, he wants cuba, he wants more land....

Essentially, act like a rational, calculated adult instead of a tough guy teenage boy showing how macho he is.


If you are talking about the straight, suffer the defeat and start with concessions to get this saga over with and stop crippling the world economy. This shit is going to get worse and will last for well over a year. Iran can persist based on predictions for 6 months to a year with no oil going out, that would devastate the world economy. Even then, I am sure as that deadline approaches they will ramp up action not concede as they appear to be extremely prideful and being run by auotcrats do not seem to care about the pain it causes the people.

Trump went in and negotiated and is still negotiating with them ad nauseam knowing they would never follow any kind of deal nuclear. They have NEVER kept their word be it in writing or other wise. He has crippled their economy, losing over $500mil a day and their inflation is at almost 100%. They don't care what happens to their own people in an economic sense and they're still executing people. We've negotiated with them since 1979. IMO, although I know Trump is just playing playing the wait game by letting their total economy dry up I personally think we should just go in level what needs to be leveled and kill who needs to be killed. Despite popular belief, they don't control the Straight. 47 years of "negotiating" Enough negotiating. Go in and end it.

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18664
  • "Don't Try"
NY Times cites new intelligence saying Iran has 90% of launchers left. First 2 days it was everything destroyed and then the undamaged percentage went up as time went on. Iran claims they have 120% compared to before the war, meaning they built more launchers and missiles. Obviously can't trust that but if the production is deep underground perhaps it's not out of the question. Don't know if and how much hardware China and Russia is supplying either.