Honestly I don't know why we got ourselves in this situation but this shit could have been finished a long time ago. Spending billions on DEI precision missiles to selectively kill kabobs riding on 100 dollar bikes and 5,000 motorboats.
Fuck that shit. We have a bunch of GBU-43's that would finish off Iran in an instant and all we have to do is drop that fucker from an airplane along with any other ordinance we can drop on them. Its much less expensive to drop shit on people then to use those sissy ass DEI guided weapons that are burning up money. If we hit someone accident then we'll just pay some diyah to the families which would be pennies on the dollar compared to what we are spending now.
I looked up the GBU-43. Google says it can only be dropped out the back of a cargo plane. I'm
guessing it would expose the plane to Iranian air defense. When the U.S. dropped 14 of the GBU-57s from B-2s I'm
guessing there was some kind of agreement that Iran would just let it happen and that would be the end. There are only 6 of those bombs left. Google says only 1 out of 20 of the other kind have been used (Afghanistan). These MOABs and MOPs wouldn't do the job on Pickaxe if that's where they were dropped. Didn't really work on Isfahan either (unclear). That's why a bunch of experts like Joe Kent are saying he thinks nukes have come up in discussion, that MTG is right, it's logical from a military perspective though possibly catastrophic strategically. Say the U.S. dropped one, who's to say Russia wouldn't then think, "okay, new rules, we're dropping a "little" tactical and surgical nuke on a NATO target. Joe Kent now speculates that now that Trump is frustrated they might come in and tell Trumo, "let us do it, that way it won't be on you." I say all the time that Israel is the one country most likely to use nukes. I'm sure Coach and chaos would be all for it. We'll see what happens
I didn't see it but even the lunatic Mark Levin supposedly said no nukes, more conventional will do the job.
