Virginia gerrymandering vote

[Irongrip400]

So, if it goes the way of the dems, do they allow it to be voted on again in 2032 after the census?

[jude2]

It passed 50 to 49 percent.  The wording was very questionable, hopefully something can be done.

[chaos]

It passed 50 to 49 percent.  The wording was very questionable, hopefully something can be done.

Add wording to the list of things that need to change in government. They pulled that shit out here in CA with a gas tax and people unwittingly voted to keep. Verbiage in bills should be clear and concise.

[LurkerNoMore]

A true FAFO moment.  Incoming rage tweets are going to be hilarious.

[Grape Ape]

Nobody should be proud of any side doing this.

It's just a domino effect.

Now, they'll push Florida to do it while there's still time to offset, and the horseshit will continue.

[LurkerNoMore]

Nobody should be proud of any side doing this.

It's just a domino effect.

Now, they'll push Florida to do it while there's still time to offset, and the horseshit will continue.

I don't seem to recall you having this attitude when it started.  Maybe I missed those posts.  Link?  Trumpy started this shit with Texas.  Then Missouri and NC.  Little MAGA wet their collective panties.  But suddenly when Virginia does it, they lose their little minds with outrage.  You don't get to start a gerrymandering war and then complain when the other side shows up.

[Grape Ape]

I don't seem to recall you having this attitude when it started.  Maybe I missed those posts.  Link?  Trumpy started this shit with Texas.  Then Missouri and NC.  Little MAGA wet their collective panties.  But suddenly when Virginia does it, they lose their little minds with outrage.  You don't get to start a gerrymandering war and then complain when the other side shows up.

You are so predictable - I literally texted chaos and said you'd bring up Texas, as that's the current talking point.

But no, it did not start there.  I mean look at Massachusetts right now.

And no, I didn't say anything about it with Texas, just as I didn't with California.  And, I said it's bullshit overall, even if Florida does it.

[Dos Equis]

So, That New VA Congressional Map That Dems Want Could Get Tossed
Matt Vespa  | April 22, 2026
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2026/04/22/so-that-new-va-congressional-map-that-dems-want-in-virginia-might-get-tossed-n2674869

[LurkerNoMore]

You are so predictable - I literally texted chaos and said you'd bring up Texas, as that's the current talking point.

But no, it did not start there.  I mean look at Massachusetts right now.

And no, I didn't say anything about it with Texas, just as I didn't with California.  And, I said it's bullshit overall, even if Florida does it.

You know what else is predictable?  Facts.  And no, it did start with Texas after Trumpy called for redistricting in 2025 ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Of course you didn't say anything about it.  Texas, Missouri and NC were all supposed to be in your party's favor.  Your passive neutrality was evident.  So no... it isn't all bullshit.  It's turn about, fair play and FAFO.  But "now" it is all "bullshit".   

Make sure you text chaos my reply here too. 

[LurkerNoMore]

"IT WAS RIGGED"

 

Let's see the pitiful defense - or rather deflection and avoidance - of your orange hero's claim now.

[Dos Equis]

That was fast.

Virginia judge blocks redistricting referendum result that boosted Democrats’ election hopes
Published Wed, Apr 22 2026
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/22/virginia-election-results-redistricting-congress-democrats.html

[IroNat]

Rand McNally is thrilled.

[LurkerNoMore]

So attempting to overturn voters again is the playbook?      What is this?  2020 all over again.  Subverting legit elections seems to be a trend for these losers.

[Grape Ape]

You know what else is predictable?  Facts.  And no, it did start with Texas after Trumpy called for redistricting in 2025 ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Of course you didn't say anything about it.  Texas, Missouri and NC were all supposed to be in your party's favor.  Your passive neutrality was evident.  So no... it isn't all bullshit.  It's turn about, fair play and FAFO.  But "now" it is all "bullshit".   

Make sure you text chaos my reply here too.

This has been happening way before Texas.

I didn't mention it with California either and said it would suck if Florida did it.  Didn't even know about Missouri and NC........

trumpy taco trumpy taco trumpy taco.....

[Necrosis]

This has been happening way before Texas.

I didn't mention it with California either and said it would suck if Florida did it.  Didn't even know about Missouri and NC........

trumpy taco trumpy taco trumpy taco.....

one party tried to end gerrymandering for 10 years, one party voted against it. I will let you guess which ones.

You could just admit the truth here.

Trump has been trying to sow distrust in elections because it's beneficial to him. If he loses, its rigged.

Claiming mail in ballots are ripe for fraud when there have been less the 80 cases in 20 years is retarded.

So they try to gerrymander to avoid the beating they are about to get, they attempt the save act in time for the mid-terms which is another failure and clear attempt to solve a problem that doesn't exist.

They clearly know they are going to lose but are ok with cheating.

Has it not registered that this guy is a criminal and fraud yet?

[LurkerNoMore]

This has been happening way before Texas.

I didn't mention it with California either and said it would suck if Florida did it.  Didn't even know about Missouri and NC........

trumpy taco trumpy taco trumpy taco.....

Let's stick with modern times.  In 2025 Trumpy called for Texas to redistrict.  And here we are....   your orange loser is whining and lying because he got beat at his own game.

But don't let that interfere with your passive neutrality facade. 

 

[Grape Ape]

Let's stick with modern times.  In 2025 Trumpy called for Texas to redistrict.  And here we are....   your orange loser is whining and lying because he got beat at his own game.

But don't let that interfere with your passive neutrality facade. 

 

I'm not neutral.

I despise the left and the democrats infinitely more than any issues I have with the right.

I'm willing to accept the right's shortcomings if it means the Democrat shitstains stay out of power.

So, yes, I can say I don't like gerrymandering at all, when either side does it.  But can also be aware of the history of it.

You, on the other hand, can never concede one thing or show any semblance of centrism.

[Grape Ape]

one party tried to end gerrymandering for 10 years, one party voted against it. I will let you guess which ones.

You could just admit the truth here.

Trump has been trying to sow distrust in elections because it's beneficial to him. If he loses, its rigged.

Claiming mail in ballots are ripe for fraud when there have been less the 80 cases in 20 years is retarded.

So they try to gerrymander to avoid the beating they are about to get, they attempt the save act in time for the mid-terms which is another failure and clear attempt to solve a problem that doesn't exist.

They clearly know they are going to lose but are ok with cheating.

Has it not registered that this guy is a criminal and fraud yet?

Claiming mail in ballots are not ripe for fraud is retarded.

[Necrosis]

Claiming mail in ballots are not ripe for fraud is retarded.

What evidence is there for it? that's the point, if there isn't any then your assumption is unfounded and retarded.

Its like quantum mechanics, have you heard of entanglement? einstein  (look up the EPR paradox) said it makes no sense and defies common logic but yet it turned out to be true.

You can't just take surface level assumptions and hold onto them despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary

[Grape Ape]

What evidence is there for it? that's the point, if there isn't any then your assumption is unfounded and retarded.

The term for this is called Arguing from Ignorance.

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

But I am positive I could search for evidence, find cases of it, and you'd dismiss it.

But you could also apply common sense and stop being retarded.

[LurkerNoMore]

I'm not neutral.

I despise the left and the democrats infinitely more than any issues I have with the right.

I'm willing to accept the right's shortcomings if it means the Democrat shitstains stay out of power.

So, yes, I can say I don't like gerrymandering at all, when either side does it.  But can also be aware of the history of it.

You, on the other hand, can never concede one thing or show any semblance of centrism.

I take it you don't understand the definition of passive neutrality.  But yeah, you are.   That's why despite it being "bullshit" back then, you still chose to stay quiet about it.  But as soon as the other side does it, you have to speak up.   If you thought it was bullshit when Texas did it, then why didn't you say so?

Passive neutrality.  Look it up.

[LurkerNoMore]

The term for this is called Arguing from Ignorance.

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

But I am positive I could search for evidence, find cases of it, and you'd dismiss it.

But you could also apply common sense and stop being retarded.

He's asking for evidence of a claim you made and you are making excuses on why you don't need to provide evidence for the claim to be true.  You are attempting poor linguistic gymnastics to try to achieve an indirect route to your statement.  Absence of evidence (proof) is always evidence (proof) of absence.  If a woman takes multiple pregnancy tests and they are all negative, it means she isn't pregnant.  It doesn't mean she can't get pregnant in the future, it means at that point in time she isn't.  In this scenario, the sheer volume of mail in ballots vs. the actual number of fraud cases is so low there is no way they are "ripe for fraud" under the current safety checks.  It is said 1 in 3 Americans vote by mail.  If it were so ripe then the actual number of documented fraud cases would be higher than it is.  Which is what again?

[Necrosis]

The term for this is called Arguing from Ignorance.

Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

But I am positive I could search for evidence, find cases of it, and you'd dismiss it.

But you could also apply common sense and stop being retarded.

There are cases, that's not the argument. There are cases of bank robbery and credit card fraud yet you use them? The cost benefit analysis is what's important.

This isn't that logical fallacy.

We have evidence, decades in fact and multiple investigations so while I appreciate that you brought that up its not actually applicable. If you are making the claim the burden is on you.

The fallacy applies to things like does cannabis help pain-- aka a lack of studies or approval does not mean the negative, it simply means we don't know, there is an absence (we do but I am making a point). There is no such thing wrt what we are discussing.

[chaos]

What evidence is there for it?

I can provide personal evidence for that. Recently I received the mail in ballots for our local election. I received 2 ballots for people that I had never heard of, along with a ballot for someone that hasn't lived in my house for almost 20 years, correct address, wrong names. So I had the opportunity to vote 4 times (mine plus the 3 others that don't live at my address for you retards that aren't good at math). If that's happening to me, how many others does that happen to? How many of those that receive those extra ballots cast those votes? All legit ballots and votes, right? No fraud there. I guess if I had to show up in person and show ID some how I could have cast all 4 of those votes right?

[illuminati]

You, on the other hand, can never concede one thing or show any semblance of centrism.

This such a obvious & common problem among Prime / Necrosis /
LurkingForBoys & all other Lefty posters - they have Zero introspect
& are Totally unable to say anything against their leftist indoctrination
& accept & back every single stupid & ridiculous thing.

Yet they think they're Oh so clever & intelligent