Author Topic: Virginia gerrymandering vote  (Read 7349 times)

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 27074
  • SC è un asino
Re: Virginia gerrymandering vote
« Reply #150 on: Today at 10:36:20 AM »

was he not convicted on 34 counts?

I am going off this exchange:

He won't answer because it's obvious. The guy has essentially been found guilty of rape and other crimes and is clearly fucking grifting money (fraudulently ) whilst in the whitehouse and these clowns love it.


Another lie. Why do liberals lie so much?

I mean he was convicted, so technically and legally it's true.

I suppose if you are a conspiracy theorist it's not true.

What do the 34 "felonies" have to do with rape.
Y

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11450
Re: Virginia gerrymandering vote
« Reply #151 on: Today at 11:17:14 AM »
I am going off this exchange:


What do the 34 "felonies" have to do with rape.

I wrote and other crimes.

He was liable in the other case which is tantamount to guilty. But I can see where you got super hung up on things here ::)


The man is a criminal and continues to commit crimes whilst in office. It's shameful stuff.


Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 27074
  • SC è un asino
Re: Virginia gerrymandering vote
« Reply #152 on: Today at 11:47:57 AM »
I wrote and other crimes.

He was liable in the other case which is tantamount to guilty. But I can see where you got super hung up on things here ::)


The man is a criminal and continues to commit crimes whilst in office. It's shameful stuff.

Hung up?  Anyone reading that would have likely been confused.

Anyway, you're wrong on rape, regardless.

However, it's interesting that you will dismiss what doesn't fit your narrative with a quick google (americasdigitalshield, for example), but won't go into the Bragg case in depth.

Any thinking person, regardless of political affiliation, should have major issues with this case.

It's the litmus test for who is a partisan sheep or not.
Y

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11450
Re: Virginia gerrymandering vote
« Reply #153 on: Today at 12:12:03 PM »
Hung up?  Anyone reading that would have likely been confused.

Anyway, you're wrong on rape, regardless.

However, it's interesting that you will dismiss what doesn't fit your narrative with a quick google (americasdigitalshield, for example), but won't go into the Bragg case in depth.

Any thinking person, regardless of political affiliation, should have major issues with this case.

It's the litmus test for who is a partisan sheep or not.

He was find liable and then for defamation was he not? his appeal was denied as well as far as I am aware. I will say it's not something I have dug into at all as I don't really give a fuck about politics all that much.

Are you saying he was not found liable for rape/sexual abuse?

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 27074
  • SC è un asino
Re: Virginia gerrymandering vote
« Reply #154 on: Today at 12:51:44 PM »
He was find liable and then for defamation was he not? his appeal was denied as well as far as I am aware. I will say it's not something I have dug into at all as I don't really give a fuck about politics all that much.

Are you saying he was not found liable for rape/sexual abuse?

You are conflating again.

The Bragg case is the 34 felonies.  That is the one you should look at in depth so you don't fall into the sheeple category.

The E Jean Carroll is the civil case where he was responsible for damages.

Neither case has him "essentially convicted of rape" and are both complete horseshit.

 
Y