We are foster parents.
We gave emergency care to 2 kids who the police removed due to abuse. The house had a history of wrong doings.
It went to court. The judge ordered the kids back.
Trust me, you see it in the kids' behaviour. I won't give more details but the system is fucked up when it comes to kids.
Just like you have fallen for the slim chance he is innocent because he made good music, so did the jury.
Remove his music, celebrity status. Let's say he worked in Walmart.......ya think you would feel the same way?
Your foster parents story should not influence the analysis or have any bearing of the MJ case. We need facts and should not use personal experiences/biases/personal feelings/opinions to solve cases.
Would be the same as if you had an alcoholic uncle who gets multiple DWIs and the judges keep releasing him. And then eventually he kills someone in another DWI incident. You then can't say anyone who drinks will then definitely get multiple DWIs and go kill someone in a DWI just because of what happened to your uncle.
I haven't fallen for anything. I don't know if he was proven guilty. Everything he's done points to him being guilty. But I'm not aware of any final decisions by the courts or police.
I'm also not saying that he's innocent because he has popular music (which I'm not a fan of). My observation is that because he still has a fan base, even after all the allegations and rumors, then that points to many who also feel he may be innocent.
Other than what people say and what they accuse him of, and their feelings of him, can you please tell me what hard evidence / proof exists that he committed all those acts? What about Central Park Five? Everyone got that wrong.
