Saying why dont I go fight for Ukraine is pretty silly, just as its silly to say you're in love with Colon McGregors hole but whatever 
So since you are so well educated on the matter what do you suggest Ukraine should have done when invaded, lay down and enjoy submission?
I don't claim to be extremely well educated on the matter, I'm saying what I think are very obvious things.
What Ukraine "should" have done is a subjective matter and the Ukrainians are free to decide their course of action. I've said they are tough warriors and if they want to sacrifice themselves for their ideals that's fine with me, it's not my call.
In my
subjective opinion the war was very much desired by 'The West' including the UK and the US, they helped provoke it as illuminati alluded to. Remember Boris stopping Zelensky from signing that deal? Now 'The West' are very happy to sacrifice the Ukrainians in the hopes of toppling Russia and Putin, we have US generals demanding that Ukraine lower the conscription age to 18. To me, it's just a very callous and nasty calculation. If the Ukrainians are fine with I don't have a problem with that per se but it's sad in a way, just in my opinion of course. Some analysts are saying Ukraine could become a firing platform without men for NATO basically, you don't need that many men to keep this proxy drone war going for a while longer.
I do think the mainstream coverage is dishonest, though even MSM sources are more and more saying the outlook is very bleak for Ukraine. And then the next moment they say Ukraine has turned the tide and Russia is at its breaking point, just needs that final push. And then again there is that realization it's fucked up.
And my counter-question to you is what in your opinion should 'The West' do wrt Russia? Do you see Russia eventually giving up? I mean if you look beyond whatever sympathies you have and whoever you think is 'in the right.' I see a hot war between NATO and Russia as extremely catastrophic, even possibly world ending. I see the Russian pundits and even some politicians demanding Putin nuke Europe.
I read some white nationalist websites who are very pro-Ukraine so I get that viewpoint also. I just now clicked a site and the first thing I see is this. Didn't read yet.
https://counter-currents.com/2026/09/pro-white-pro-ukraine-part-1/Pro-White Pro Ukraine, Part 1
Why White Nationalists Should Support Ukraine Against Russia
Risto Nõmmik
Part 1: Was it NATO the Whole Time?
There are many facets of the Russo-Ukraine War which are of core importance to White Nationalists. But the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), its constituent governments, and the Russian Federation do not represent White Nationalist interests. However, thousands of White Nationalists have been convinced by Kremlin propaganda to take upon themselves the Kremlin’s grievances as if they were our own. Therefore, because these lies are being used in an attempt to justify the unprovoked, unjustified killing of hundreds of thousands of White people, this chapter will be devoted to refuting the claim that NATO expansion, and NATO broadly, provoked Russia into invading Ukraine, a non-NATO country.
The most famous proponent of the “NATO provoked Russia into invading Ukraine” argument is John J. Mearsheimer, Professor of International Relations at the University of Chicago. In 2015, Mearsheimer gave a lecture titled “Why Ukraine is the West’s fault” which has since garnered over 30 million views and earned Mearsheimer acclaim as having supposedly warned the West what their actions were leading to.
For those of you unaware of this argument, I’ll briefly summarize it. Mearsheimer is not the only proponent of this argument and therefore I will also include significant portions of the narrative which other communities, such as the White Nationalist, “alternative media,” and far-left communities, promote. The argument is as follows:
Hopefully I will have the patience to skim that article in a bit
