Author Topic: Radical Islam....  (Read 942 times)

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20526
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Radical Islam....
« Reply #25 on: November 13, 2026, 04:32:55 AM »
Cool.
I am curious though, what do you think posting 150 year old quote is going to do? Are you trying to persuade people that the founding fathers had different opinions? All that shows is that muzzies have been a problem for hundreds of years if you have to try to make a peace treaty with them way back then.

Alternate viewpoints as a counter to fear mongering simplistic propaganda aimed at certain demographics. If "muzzies" are a problem, why are they a problem? Maybe US and European foreign policy is one reason? Maybe Israel's control of US foreign policy? Maybe US constitution and US founding principles and ideas, or their current interpretation, allow for problems to arise? I have a lot of thoughts about all this LOL but I'm sure you know some of it, Coach doesn't.

"We all know it's the Jews, give it a rest already," someone said.

We do not need Israel.

I would even say Israel is the cause of any issues with Muslims. Coach acts like Iran wants to wipe the US and Israel off the map "for no reason at all," just hate. It's not like the US has been in the ME killing millions of civilians for Israel's benefit. Iran does not want to wipe out either country off the map either, Iran has explicitly stated they have no issue with the US populace at large, the issue is with leadership and foreign policy, hence Death to America and Big and Little Satan.

The US needs Israel like someone needs cancer.

Quote
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has stated that the phrase "Death to America" targets U.S. policies and leadership rather than ordinary American citizens.

Key Quotes & Statements

• On the Slogan’s Meaning: Ayatollah Khamenei clarified the intent behind the chant, stating: "It means death to the few people running that country. We have nothing against the American nation."

• Opposition to Policies: He has repeatedly emphasized that the slogan represents opposition to U.S. "global arrogance," interventionism, and hostile government policies rather than a hatred of the American people

The US and its attitude towards killing millions in the ME:

Quote
AI:

60 Minutes interview, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations (((Madeleine Albright))) was asked by correspondent Lesley Stahl about reports that U.S.-led economic sanctions on Iraq had resulted in the deaths of half a million children —more than the number of children killed in Hiroshima—and whether "the price was worth it". Albright replied, "I think that is a very hard choice, but the price, we think, the price is worth it."
 

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 65573
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Radical Islam....
« Reply #26 on: November 13, 2026, 07:11:30 AM »
We do not need Israel.
X2

Alternate viewpoints as a counter to fear mongering simplistic propaganda aimed at certain demographics. If "muzzies" are a problem, why are they a problem?
Because their beliefs are not compatible with a normal westernized society. I know you have accepted them and their backwards ways into your society, but try to remember BM when your family could walk the streets without being harassed. Didn't you recently say you were concerned about your mother taking transportation? Why? Is it because of the violent, out of control white christian?
The Constitution allows them to practice their religion, not change our laws and force their religion on others. ;)
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10424
  • .......
Re: Radical Islam....
« Reply #27 on: November 13, 2026, 10:13:23 AM »
Of course if you're not politically motivated. But when it comes to the National defense of our country and Israel's I'm not taking the side of the ideology (and it is ideologically driven) that wants to wipe both countries off the map. Again, we need Israel and Israel needs us.

And the result has been 911, War on Terror and global terrorist attacks.

According to the terrorists their main reason for their attacks on Westerners is US support of Israel.

What has actually been achieved? Absolute zero stability or peace in the region, except more terrorist attacks, wars, and continued funding for Israel.

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20526
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Radical Islam....
« Reply #28 on: November 13, 2026, 04:25:54 PM »
X2
Because their beliefs are not compatible with a normal westernized society. I know you have accepted them and their backwards ways into your society, but try to remember BM when your family could walk the streets without being harassed. Didn't you recently say you were concerned about your mother taking transportation? Why? Is it because of the violent, out of control white christian?
The Constitution allows them to practice their religion, not change our laws and force their religion on others. ;)

You know goddamn well I have accepted nothing. Yes the immigrants are a family security problem for me. But I'm the one saying no Muslim immigration to western nations. Even under conservative rule legal Muslim immigration is allowed into the US. I'm the one saying even the peaceful, law abiding ones are a security problem if and when shit hits the fan. I'm also the one saying old fashioned racial discrimination in immigration is good, race mixing and miscegenation is bad. You want the Sikhs? The Chosen aren't exactly good either, in fact "the world's foremost problem" as Henry Ford said.

Even Coach talks about "radical Islam," apparently making a distinction. I'm more antimuslim in a way than both of you guys.

As I said, the US constitution and the founding principles has a problem in it, it allows for religion and race mixing. They are interpreted and reinterpreted as time goes on anyway, like the racial mixing with immigration. Today all US mainstream conservatives are avowed antiracists. Only whites are antiracists, to their detriment. This is the liberalization process I talk about which people have allowed to erode society. It's the "new normal," like the "I'm far from homophobic!"

When Muslims are in their own countries you can be decent and you can find common ground. You can even see some positives in their societies, like in their conservatism, their family values. Wanting to kill them all over there doesn't seem very Christian to me. Not decent!

What has actually been achieved?

More radical Muslims seeking vengeance. Close to 200 little girls killed in an AI Palantir double-tap strike in the Minab school. Think about the numbers in their extended families and the radicals created. Iranians throw stones at the president and diplomats because they are talking to the US at all, saying they want blood.

Quote
Maven Smart System: U.S. Central Command relied heavily on Palantir's Maven Smart System for data fusion, target selection, and assessing courses of action.

Palantir is also used to kill Palestinians. Close to 100K killed directly, hundreds of thousands indirectly (like lack of medical care, drugs, starvation, exposure - lack of housing). Not forgotten soon.

With the Iran war you now have the Mecca alliance as Muslim nations seek security elsewhere since the US couldn't protect them. Several of these nations Israel has said they will be coming for after Iran but now they will be bound to each other for defense. Is Israel more safe now?

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 64492
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Radical Islam....
« Reply #29 on: November 13, 2026, 06:16:02 PM »
You know goddamn well I have accepted nothing. Yes the immigrants are a family security problem for me. But I'm the one saying no Muslim immigration to western nations. Even under conservative rule legal Muslim immigration is allowed into the US. I'm the one saying even the peaceful, law abiding ones are a security problem if and when shit hits the fan. I'm also the one saying old fashioned racial discrimination in immigration is good, race mixing and miscegenation is bad. You want the Sikhs? The Chosen aren't exactly good either, in fact "the world's foremost problem" as Henry Ford said.

Even Coach talks about "radical Islam," apparently making a distinction. I'm more antimuslim in a way than both of you guys.

As I said, the US constitution and the founding principles has a problem in it, it allows for religion and race mixing. They are interpreted and reinterpreted as time goes on anyway, like the racial mixing with immigration. Today all US mainstream conservatives are avowed antiracists. Only whites are antiracists, to their detriment. This is the liberalization process I talk about which people have allowed to erode society. It's the "new normal," like the "I'm far from homophobic!"

When Muslims are in their own countries you can be decent and you can find common ground. You can even see some positives in their societies, like in their conservatism, their family values. Wanting to kill them all over there doesn't seem very Christian to me. Not decent!

More radical Muslims seeking vengeance. Close to 200 little girls killed in an AI Palantir double-tap strike in the Minab school. Think about the numbers in their extended families and the radicals created. Iranians throw stones at the president and diplomats because they are talking to the US at all, saying they want blood.

Palantir is also used to kill Palestinians. Close to 100K killed directly, hundreds of thousands indirectly (like lack of medical care, drugs, starvation, exposure - lack of housing). Not forgotten soon.

With the Iran war you now have the Mecca alliance as Muslim nations seek security elsewhere since the US couldn't protect them. Several of these nations Israel has said they will be coming for after Iran but now they will be bound to each other for defense. Is Israel more safe now?

Hahahaha...the minute I posted this thread I knew you would be the first to defend them. You didn't disappoint

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 65573
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Radical Islam....
« Reply #30 on: November 13, 2026, 07:01:57 PM »
You know goddamn well I have accepted nothing. Yes the immigrants are a family security problem for me. But I'm the one saying no Muslim immigration to western nations. Even under conservative rule legal Muslim immigration is allowed into the US. I'm the one saying even the peaceful, law abiding ones are a security problem if and when shit hits the fan. I'm also the one saying old fashioned racial discrimination in immigration is good, race mixing and miscegenation is bad. You want the Sikhs? The Chosen aren't exactly good either, in fact "the world's foremost problem" as Henry Ford said.

Even Coach talks about "radical Islam," apparently making a distinction. I'm more antimuslim in a way than both of you guys.

As I said, the US constitution and the founding principles has a problem in it, it allows for religion and race mixing. They are interpreted and reinterpreted as time goes on anyway, like the racial mixing with immigration. Today all US mainstream conservatives are avowed antiracists. Only whites are antiracists, to their detriment. This is the liberalization process I talk about which people have allowed to erode society. It's the "new normal," like the "I'm far from homophobic!"

When Muslims are in their own countries you can be decent and you can find common ground. You can even see some positives in their societies, like in their conservatism, their family values. Wanting to kill them all over there doesn't seem very Christian to me. Not decent!

More radical Muslims seeking vengeance. Close to 200 little girls killed in an AI Palantir double-tap strike in the Minab school. Think about the numbers in their extended families and the radicals created. Iranians throw stones at the president and diplomats because they are talking to the US at all, saying they want blood.

Palantir is also used to kill Palestinians. Close to 100K killed directly, hundreds of thousands indirectly (like lack of medical care, drugs, starvation, exposure - lack of housing). Not forgotten soon.

With the Iran war you now have the Mecca alliance as Muslim nations seek security elsewhere since the US couldn't protect them. Several of these nations Israel has said they will be coming for after Iran but now they will be bound to each other for defense. Is Israel more safe now?
You want them in their own lands, chaos wants them eradicated. We are not the same.
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!