Author Topic: the coleman DELTS... (Read 13449 times)

the shadow · « **on:** May 09, 2006, 12:07:08 AM »

now these r wat delts really look like...they look as big as ruhl or levrones..look at those striations....i think coleman also has some esiclene or synthol..i don't care if he has them or not....COLEMAN RULZ

the shadow · « **Reply #1 on:** May 09, 2006, 12:14:21 AM »

more thick coleman delts....

onlyme · « **Reply #2 on:** May 09, 2006, 01:37:28 AM »

My buddy was voted by Flex Magazine as having the best delts in history. These aren't to good a shots but you get the picture. And this was 25+ years ago

LuciusFox · « **Reply #3 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:26:34 PM »

Quote from: onlyme on May 09, 2006, 01:37:28 AM

My buddy was voted by Flex Magazine as having the best delts in history. These aren't to good a shots but you get the picture. And this was 25+ years ago

He's tiny $:-\$

Dan-O · « **Reply #4 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:33:54 PM »

There's an old pic of Grymko standing in front of Gold's gym wearing a black Gold's t-shirt and he looks freakin unbelievably wide! I haven't seen that pic in a long time. If anyone can post it, you'll see what onlyme is talking about.

onlyme · « **Reply #5 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:35:07 PM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on May 09, 2006, 02:26:34 PM

He's tiny $:-\$

He competed at 265 so he isn't tiny. There are some really good pics of him I will try to find

Hulkster · « **Reply #6 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:38:25 PM »

one of the most awesome delt shots ever!

LuciusFox · « **Reply #7 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:39:17 PM »

Quote from: onlyme on May 09, 2006, 02:35:07 PM

He competed at 265 so he isn't tiny. There are some really good pics of him I will try to find

He looks to be about the same size as Frank Zane. $:-\$

MorningPoop · « **Reply #8 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:39:30 PM »

Flex Wheeler would blow both those guys away with his delts.

onlyme · « **Reply #9 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:41:10 PM »

Dan-o,

He doesn't look to small in these

Killahbee · « **Reply #10 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:42:12 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 09, 2006, 02:38:25 PM

one of the most awesome delt shots ever!

That is probably the best picture of coleman i have ever seen. Awesome physique overall no dout, but that picture is when he was at his best. I'm guessing 96 (ish).

Hulkster · « **Reply #11 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:46:44 PM »

Quote from: Killahbee on May 09, 2006, 02:42:12 PM

That is probably the best picture of coleman i have ever seen. Awesome physique overall no dout, but that picture is when he was at his best. I'm guessing 96 (ish).

its from 1999. Despite what ND says, 1996 was not his best overall physique. He was ripped (but his quads lacked deep cuts but had striations), but in 98/99 he was just as ripped but also had more thickness, size and fullness. HIs quads were deeply etched.

I prefer the deep etched look to the smoother but striated look.

eg.

the bottom shot looks better in my opinion

LuciusFox · « **Reply #12 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:47:22 PM »

Quote from: onlyme on May 09, 2006, 02:41:10 PM

Dan-o,

He doesn't look to small in these

I guess standards have changed with time. He looks like an average modern NPC guy.

pwn3d · « **Reply #13 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:48:52 PM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on May 09, 2006, 02:47:22 PM

I guess standards have changed with time. He looks like an average modern NPC guy.

i guess

Dan-O · « **Reply #14 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:52:06 PM »

Quote from: onlyme on May 09, 2006, 02:41:10 PM

Dan-o,

He doesn't look to small in these

No he doesn't! This was the pic I was thinking of. I must've gotten confused, it wasn't a Gold's shirt!

LuciusFox · « **Reply #15 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:52:44 PM »

Quote from: pwn3d on May 09, 2006, 02:48:52 PM

i guess

Hi, Pete!

Hulkster · « **Reply #16 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:53:36 PM »

when did John Holmes compete in bodybuilding?

Or is that Johnny Wadd?

alexxx · « **Reply #17 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:53:58 PM »

WOW Pete G is a huge mofo!

onlyme · « **Reply #18 on:** May 09, 2006, 02:56:37 PM »

Pete is about 5'10 and competed at 265. I dn't consider that small by any stretch of the imagination.

MisterMagoo · « **Reply #19 on:** May 09, 2006, 03:25:55 PM »

wasn't pete the guy who was in musclemag or something a few years ago talking about his ten gram a day drug usage?

NotMrAverage · « **Reply #20 on:** May 09, 2006, 03:47:23 PM »

Pete is so small noadays that people always go like. "was HE a bodybuilder!? No way man, no way!"

WOOO · « **Reply #21 on:** May 09, 2006, 03:50:30 PM »

Quote from: the shadow on May 09, 2006, 12:07:08 AM

now these r wat delts really look like...they look as big as ruhl or levrones..look at those striations....i think coleman also has some esiclene or synthol..i don't care if he has them or not....COLEMAN RULZ

COLEMAN RUHLS?

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #22 on:** May 09, 2006, 04:13:04 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 09, 2006, 02:46:44 PM

its from 1999. Despite what ND says, 1996 was not his best overall physique. He was ripped (but his quads lacked deep cuts but had striations), but in 98/99 he was just as ripped but also had more thickness, size and fullness. HIs quads were deeply etched.

I prefer the deep etched look to the smoother but striated look.

eg.

the bottom shot looks better in my opinion

Put 1996 Coleman under that lighting at the Grand Prix and he would look just as impressive !! anyway Coleman has some sick delts , this is what prevents his side-chest from being better than it can !!

onlyme · « **Reply #23 on:** May 09, 2006, 04:32:54 PM »

Quote from: NotMrAverage on May 09, 2006, 03:47:23 PM

Pete is so small noadays that people always go like. "was HE a bodybuilder!? No way man, no way!"

Yea, he is weighing just below 180 I think now. He may be over a bit.

gibberj2 · « **Reply #24 on:** May 09, 2006, 04:45:35 PM »

we have a contender.