Author Topic: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?  (Read 2175 times)

New York

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 911
  • New York
Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
« on: May 14, 2006, 10:37:49 AM »
I wonder how these two would pair up in a head to head battle?

420 Diesel

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 266
  • Getbig!
Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2006, 11:11:34 AM »
strydom wins on everything but back.

Mr. Intenseone

  • Guest
Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2006, 11:13:26 AM »
I wonder how these two would pair up in a head to head battle?

Strydom in conditioning, shape and separation. Chick in the back (as soft as it was)!

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2006, 11:15:28 AM »
I'd even give Strydom the nod in the hair department.  ;D

MisterGX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1002
  • Getbig!
Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2006, 05:03:49 PM »
I'd even give Strydom the nod in the hair department.  ;D

Chic would easily smoke Strydom mainly because Gary can't pose for shit..

Jujoshu

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 472
  • Front Row Tickets
Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2006, 05:06:32 PM »
Bob has him beat on wardrobe.

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2006, 05:14:18 PM »
 Chic wins easily. Strydom has no back.

Wombat

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2873
  • Your name tattooed to my ass!
Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2006, 06:38:46 PM »
yeah as tight as Gary was, Chick would make him look tiny from the back...Chick has to much of an X frame to lose to the straight up and down GARy...

disco_stu

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4953
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Did Gary Strydom Look Better Than Chic?
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2006, 07:11:18 PM »
thats where the sport is at. It is a Mr.Back contest these days.

an unproportionate amount of weighting goes on the look from the rear.

it used to be used as a tie breaker, but has evolved into much more than it needs to be. Today you can win everywhere, lose on back, and lose the show.