|
Jake_W
|
 |
« on: May 28, 2006, 05:04:13 PM » |
|
?
|
|
|
|
|
|
alexxx
|
|
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2006, 05:06:08 PM » |
|
Matarazo?
|
just push some weight!
|
|
|
|
Steve Namat
|
|
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2006, 05:08:36 PM » |
|
Lee Labrada (1993 Arnold Classic, 2. place)
|
|
|
|
|
HowDog
|
|
« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2006, 05:12:21 PM » |
|
Lee Labrada (1993 Arnold Classic, 2. place)
DY of course |
|
|
|
|
|
Jake_W
|
|
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2006, 05:13:24 PM » |
|
Yes  lee Labrada |
|
|
|
|
|
NarcissisticDeity
|
|
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2006, 05:16:08 PM » |
|
Someone told me that the pic is of Mattarazos calves and in the magazine listed it wrong saying they were Labradas  |
|
|
|
|
|
alexxx
|
|
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2006, 05:17:48 PM » |
|
BOOOO YAAAAA!!!
|
just push some weight!
|
|
|
|
MisterMagoo
|
|
« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2006, 05:30:51 PM » |
|
Someone told me that the pic is of Mattarazos calves and in the magazine listed it wrong saying they were Labradas that someone would be right. look at the outer edge of the calf on the first pic, then the one of lee. they look nothing alike. |
|
|
|
|
bailey
Getbig III
Posts: 634
Getbig!
|
|
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2006, 06:01:38 PM » |
|
100 percent Mike Matarazzos calves ! They are not Labradas. Labrada actually had very week calves. I will post a pic. They are Mats. End of Discussion !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hulkster
|
|
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2006, 06:04:07 PM » |
|
Someone told me that the pic is of Mattarazos calves and in the magazine listed it wrong saying they were Labradas correct. Musclemag got it wrong in their 1993 AC report. I have the issue around somewhere. |
Flower Boy Ran Away
|
|
|
|
gracie bjj
|
|
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2006, 06:08:24 PM » |
|
i was almost gonna say casey viater
|
R
|
|
|
luc
Getbig II
Posts: 50
Getbig!
|
|
« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2006, 06:15:14 PM » |
|
De Mayo
|
|
|
|
|
Old-Skool
Getbig III
Posts: 701
Back in the Day....
|
|
« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2006, 06:33:27 PM » |
|
c'mon....only Mattarazzo has those wacky vertical striations and thick soleus under wide square huge cows!.......... This also just may be Lee Labrada's Thigh!  |
|
|
|
|
|
ANAL DISCHARGE
|
|
« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2006, 06:37:39 PM » |
|
Lee looks amazing though in the version of the most muscular he is doing. If that's from the AC in 93 it's a damn shame he came in at the O that year looking flat as he would have taken 2nd or 3rd in the AC shape. Best short guy ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
IceCold
|
|
« Reply #14 on: May 30, 2006, 08:23:40 PM » |
|
defintely mike's.
|
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)
|
|
|
|
Hurricane Beef !
|
|
« Reply #15 on: May 31, 2006, 03:12:45 AM » |
|
There is NO WAY they are Lee's calves . . . they belong to Mike.
The Beef
|
m
|
|
|
|
natural al
|
|
« Reply #16 on: May 31, 2006, 06:14:27 AM » |
|
100 percent Mike Matarazzos calves ! They are not Labradas. Labrada actually had very week calves. I will post a pic. They are Mats. End of Discussion !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
show me a pic with Labrada's weak calves...c'mon now. his calves were not weak. |
nasser=piece of shit
|
|
|
bailey
Getbig III
Posts: 634
Getbig!
|
|
« Reply #17 on: May 31, 2006, 09:35:55 AM » |
|
Like I said Weak calves !!!! How anyone can say those monster Mattarazo calves look like Labradas must be smokin something. Most Getbiggers have better calves than Labrada.
|
|
|
|
|
bailey
Getbig III
Posts: 634
Getbig!
|
|
« Reply #18 on: May 31, 2006, 09:43:11 AM » |
|
Great physique, but not in the calve department. Look at those little things, and compare to the picture in question. Not even remotely close..
|
|
|
|
|
|
