« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: intravenous (iv)  (Read 1715 times)

coldduck

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Getbig!
intravenous (iv)
« on: June 02, 2006, 07:59:19 PM »
hey bros have any of you applied somatropin intravenous , or know anyone who has and what kind of results did they get
Logged

Luv2Hurt

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6036
Re: intravenous (iv)
« Reply #1 on: June 03, 2006, 05:52:40 AM »
Sounds like a very bad idea.  Absorption is ideal in the sub-Q layer anyhow.  Why do you want to do this?
Logged

coldduck

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Getbig!
Re: intravenous (iv)
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2006, 06:53:52 AM »
i have used over 4 different kinds of growth and i have always injected under the skin and got ok results but once i injected straight into the vein i immediately got huge results.i was also told that you lose a certain percentage of growth by going under the skin because of your body temp
Logged

Arnold jr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7247
  • fleshandiron.com
Re: intravenous (iv)
« Reply #3 on: June 03, 2006, 10:33:01 AM »
Quote from: coldduck on June 03, 2006, 06:53:52 AM
i was also told that you lose a certain percentage of growth by going under the skin because of your body temp
Where did you hear this and what is the logic behind it?
Logged

coldduck

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Getbig!
Re: intravenous (iv)
« Reply #4 on: June 03, 2006, 11:01:39 AM »
i've talked to different national bodybuilders and i was told that doing it sub-q you do not get 100% of the growth , the next step is to go intramuscular and add 1ml of bacteriastatic water and for best results go intravenously. now that is just jinitropin and gentropin that i have used. right now at 6.3" 1/2 i am 334lbs .i did the 2005 north american at 278lbs so i am hoping that doing this this way will be better for me , again bros thanks for your feed back   
Logged

mem

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 490
  • lifetime athlete
Re: intravenous (iv)
« Reply #5 on: June 03, 2006, 12:02:27 PM »
Likely PH issues . . .
not compatible

NOT needed and
probably would not
even work . . .
Logged
1 life 1 liver

freakfestMD

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 909
  • Getbig!
Re: intravenous (iv)
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2006, 01:06:43 PM »
I think I'd agree with that one mem.  GH is not suppossed to be taken i.v., although I would say I have no experience with it in that way.  IM/sub Q drugs are made to be that way for a reason.
Logged

coldduck

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Getbig!
Re: intravenous (iv)
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2006, 01:23:50 PM »
help me out bros what is ,PH issues, and again thank you all for your info 
Logged

mem

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 490
  • lifetime athlete
Re: intravenous (iv)
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2006, 03:09:18 PM »
PH is the alkaline or acidic nature of substances.
very *polar properties* - eg: like night or day.

Phosphoric acid (like Coca-Cola) is the chemical
that is added to Hgh (from factory) listed on
the label, to *adjust it* for introduction or
*acceptance by* use in the body.

Plus taking it sub-cutaneously you get a lasting
principle of lypolysis (fat loss), local to that area.
One of my favorite benefits . . .
Logged
1 life 1 liver

coldduck

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 21
  • Getbig!
Re: intravenous (iv)
« Reply #9 on: June 03, 2006, 04:36:48 PM »
thanks MEM for that info , but the (IV) has worked for me ,the sub-q with the fat loss , i did not see a lot of fat loss but that was me, but thanks again for taking the time out to educate me   
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »