Author Topic: Ruhl dwarfing Burke  (Read 4693 times)

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33133
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« on: June 08, 2006, 07:44:10 AM »

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2006, 07:52:57 AM »
that's not what I would call a dwarfing.

Remember that pic with Willy Stalling ( sp ?) and Artwood at the florida pro ?
THAT was a dwarfing


Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2006, 07:55:09 AM »
Here is a real dwarfing


Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2006, 12:22:39 PM »
go back to the 2002 Olympia, theres pics of Flex and Orville doing the rear lat spread next to each other. Now let me tell you, THAT is the very personification of the word dwarfing!
Scouser on Tour

jaejonna

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14944
  • Head Asian of Getbig
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2006, 12:26:30 PM »
HMMMMMM
L

sarcasm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12318
  • The Luke loves Dungeons and Dragons
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2006, 12:26:48 PM »
with all due respect to Markus he is not dwarfing Orville at all there, that is just Markus standing 2 feet closer to the camera, if you really look their muscle size appears to be almost the same bodypart for bodypart.
Jaejonna rows 125!!

JKDMan

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1498
  • The G.O.A.T.
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2006, 12:37:01 PM »

Not a "dwarfing", sorry. Burke was a beast.
Lee

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2006, 12:41:16 PM »
Not a "dwarfing", sorry. Burke was a beast.

That would have to make Ruhl...


HUGEPECS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4061
  • School of Hard knocks Gym
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #8 on: June 08, 2006, 12:46:29 PM »
that's too old, dude. Ruhl is still competing, and Burke will never compete again. and yes, Ruhl dwarfs a lot of pros outthere, except  Gunter and a few others
Get Big, or Die Trying

gibberj2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2921
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #9 on: June 08, 2006, 12:53:08 PM »
He's a little bit bigger but doesn't dwarf him. In the 04 Olympia challange round Ruhl stood in front of Dexter and eclipsed him completely. that was very funny.

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #10 on: June 08, 2006, 12:57:24 PM »
Nasser, Ruhl, Fux, Art, Ronnie, Jay, Dorian, Orville, Gunter - These guys are/were all exceptionally huge human beings. Their bodyweights may differ but their sizes are actually really close. Now you stick anyone of those guys against someone like Melvin, RJ, Lee, Phil Heath etc then those people will be compleyely dominated for size. But compare them to each other and, with the possible exception of the 287lb+ Coleman, youll find that they are as big as each other.
Scouser on Tour

theonlyone

  • Guest
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #11 on: June 08, 2006, 01:18:41 PM »
go back to the 2002 Olympia, theres pics of Flex and Orville doing the rear lat spread next to each other. Now let me tell you, THAT is the very personification of the word dwarfing!
U CALL THIS? ORVILLE S RIGHT DOWN SHITING! THOUGH HE DOES ALWAYS WALK LIKE THING EHH.

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #12 on: June 08, 2006, 01:28:51 PM »
damn you for making me scan and optimise this fucking thing to prove a point! lol
Scouser on Tour

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #13 on: June 08, 2006, 02:24:55 PM »
if ruhl can come in like that again he would be 2nd place

gibberj2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2921
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #14 on: June 08, 2006, 02:53:20 PM »
DAMN!!! Look at the thickness in Ruhl's chest!

theonlyone

  • Guest
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #15 on: June 08, 2006, 03:20:21 PM »
beuty and the beast

Hendrix

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1346
  • Male Silverback Gorillas Do Not Take Drugs.
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #16 on: June 08, 2006, 09:06:51 PM »
They both look great in that pose, but neither has beastly proportions.  If anything I would give it to Orville, on both size and aesthetic counts.
Agreed.But Orvilles shoulder to waist ratio is exteme probaly the best of all time, and was not paid his dues in the IFBB.
When i heard about his health problems and his innabilty to make a comback i nearly cried he was one of my favourites,
BOBB SAPP KILLS

Wombat

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2873
  • Your name tattooed to my ass!
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #17 on: June 08, 2006, 09:40:03 PM »
damn you for making me scan and optimise this fucking thing to prove a point! lol

i never thought this would come out of my mouth but Titus got screwed that year at the olympia....he was hard as nails and flex should have been dead last...Flex actually beat Orville (i believe) that year...Didn't Orville place 10th...Titus should have been in Flexes placing :-\

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: Ruhl dwarfing Burke
« Reply #18 on: June 09, 2006, 02:13:10 AM »
Titus finished 11th and yes, he did look very good. The biggest shock was Claude Groulx coming last when he could have been 8th. That was sickening, he looked spot on
Scouser on Tour