Author Topic: If you were the judge - who would you choose? (Read 5081 times)

theonlyone · « **on:** June 08, 2006, 03:23:06 PM »

If you were the judge whom to you would give the 1st place on the 1 pose alone?

ribonucleic · « **Reply #1 on:** June 08, 2006, 03:24:17 PM »

To the guy with balanced muscular development as defined in the IFBB judging guidelines - rather than the refrigerator with nipples.

Is that the answer you were looking for?

delta9mda · « **Reply #2 on:** June 08, 2006, 03:24:58 PM »

RHUL!!!!!!!!!!! seriously, he is owning and mastering wheeler.

Dnizneer · « **Reply #3 on:** June 08, 2006, 03:25:33 PM »

Quote from: theonlyone on June 08, 2006, 03:23:06 PM

If you were the judge whom to you would give the 1st place on the 1 pose alone?

I'd give it to the "O", although the "M" does put up a good fight.

WOOO · « **Reply #4 on:** June 08, 2006, 03:25:41 PM »

ether · « **Reply #5 on:** June 08, 2006, 05:41:03 PM »

RHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUULLLLLLLLL LLLLL

Stavios · « **Reply #6 on:** June 08, 2006, 05:56:06 PM »

In that shot ? Ruhl for sure

FREAKgeek · « **Reply #7 on:** June 08, 2006, 06:00:50 PM »

rooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

AVBG · « **Reply #8 on:** June 08, 2006, 06:05:56 PM »

Markus Ruhl... Wheeler looks like a little boy next to Ruhl.

ieffinhatecardio · « **Reply #9 on:** June 08, 2006, 06:09:46 PM »

Quote from: ribonucleic on June 08, 2006, 03:24:17 PM

refrigerator with nipples.

LOL, classic. This ribo guy is pretty funny.

Triple-H_2005 · « **Reply #10 on:** June 08, 2006, 06:10:47 PM »

Isn't that from the year that Flex was "drug-free"? I know hw had to be on something, but he was considerably smaller than usual. Still, I think although Flex is smaller, he looks better than Ruhl...and thankfully, a contest isn't judged on one pose: and Flex OWNED him from the back!

Sir William Idol · « **Reply #11 on:** June 08, 2006, 07:47:31 PM »

2002 yup.....flex aint even flexing there though......ruhl kills him

Hendrix · « **Reply #12 on:** June 08, 2006, 08:06:34 PM »

Quote from: Triple-H_2005 on June 08, 2006, 06:10:47 PM

Isn't that from the year that Flex was "drug-free"? I know hw had to be on something, but he was considerably smaller than usual. Still, I think although Flex is smaller, he looks better than Ruhl...and thankfully, a contest isn't judged on one pose: and Flex OWNED him from the back!

I agree that piture is taken of Flex natural,anyway Ruhl looks fucking incredible its a pity he cannot match the old Flex who weighed 243 pounds in the 99MrO,Superior proportions and flow to Flexs physique.
Indeed Ruhl is massive at 280 contest shape but it would be nice to see Ruhl lose some of his contest weight and come in really hard with conditioning and fullfill his potential.

Mobil · « **Reply #13 on:** June 08, 2006, 10:03:22 PM »

in that same contest flex placed much higher then ruhl(its hard to believe).. ruhl does present the X frame in that pic though... even though in most poses he looks really blocky, but in that one he has very wide shoulders compared to his waist with a very large quad sweep

Sir William Idol · « **Reply #14 on:** June 08, 2006, 10:04:28 PM »

flex got 7th i think

Cavalier22 · « **Reply #15 on:** June 08, 2006, 10:07:29 PM »

not completely natural, he was HRT

Ron · « **Reply #16 on:** June 08, 2006, 10:08:47 PM »

From that shot, Ruhl is much bigger, muscular. But here is the kicker. The problem with one shot it that you are not sure in the picture whether Flex is done with his pose or if he is just starting or ending. That is why there are many other poses - because someone may have the greatest chest, and the worst back and legs. Or not be symmetrical. Still, many people prefer Flex's physique because that is something attainable to them, whereas Ruhl is just out of this world. That is one of the biggest debates in the industry, whether or not a smaller framed and lower weight pro bodybuilder can get a fair shake in the face of a heavier, more muscular bodybuilder. Do you compete on muscles or symmetrical, conditioning or hardness, and so on.

Wombat · « **Reply #17 on:** June 08, 2006, 10:12:41 PM »

the sad part about this whole thing is Flex was still competing sauced up to the moon even with all his health problems $:-\$

MONSTER family values

SteelePegasus · « **Reply #18 on:** June 08, 2006, 10:30:21 PM »

I would choose Ronnie over those two clowns

ether · « **Reply #19 on:** June 09, 2006, 05:51:49 AM »

Quote from: Ron on June 08, 2006, 10:08:47 PM

From that shot, Ruhl is much bigger, muscular. But here is the kicker. The problem with one shot it that you are not sure in the picture whether Flex is done with his pose or if he is just starting or ending. That is why there are many other poses - because someone may have the greatest chest, and the worst back and legs. Or not be symmetrical. Still, many people prefer Flex's physique because that is something attainable to them, whereas Ruhl is just out of this world. That is one of the biggest debates in the industry, whether or not a smaller framed and lower weight pro bodybuilder can get a fair shake in the face of a heavier, more muscular bodybuilder. Do you compete on muscles or symmetrical, conditioning or hardness, and so on.

The debate is not an issue from that olympia, there can be only one side....

RHUL

jaejonna · « **Reply #20 on:** June 09, 2006, 06:13:37 AM »

gracie bjj · « **Reply #21 on:** June 09, 2006, 07:20:47 AM »

ruhl no doubt

M75 · « **Reply #22 on:** June 09, 2006, 07:34:12 AM »

rocket · « **Reply #23 on:** June 09, 2006, 07:35:35 AM »

Ruhl, no question.

mrco · « **Reply #24 on:** June 09, 2006, 08:02:29 AM »

I would pick Heath! He is unstoppable!!

Author Topic: If you were the judge - who would you choose? (Read 5081 times)

theonlyone

Stavios

AVBG