You've been entirely unable to explain Columbu's wins on any rational basis yet continue to claim the judges are entirely fair.
Epic contradictions.
Yates remains the Columbu of the 90s. Dillet blowing away Yates.
epic hypocrisy , you still have yet to explain 2001/2002 I did comment on Columbu's wins I said he shouldn't have won simply based on gyno ( Coleman as well ) however I've only seen a few pictures of the contests thats way to inconclusive to make a definitive opinion on the contest so spare me the talk about making rational statements because thats not rational at all its ignorant which your prone to
one pictures proves NOTHING I can post several pictures of Dorian obliterating Dillett from the rear single pictures prove nothing , Dorian complete blows Dillett off the stage in conditioning hence why Paul was always relegated to mid places .
what you're stuck in is this notion a certain person beats Dorian because he meets PART of the criteria better than Yates this rational is ignorant that is not how contests are judged deal with it.