Author Topic: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!  (Read 16420 times)

gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #75 on: June 25, 2006, 02:53:56 PM »
Wow, great shots. I had not seen them in about 36 hours.......... ::)
HAHA, RON.....

FloridaMuscle

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 46
  • live to train, train to live
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #76 on: June 25, 2006, 03:31:14 PM »
people talk alot of shit about rons distended stomach, it must not be that big of a deal cause he's got 8 fat ass sandows sitting at his house! you cant argue with straight up success

HERACLES

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3025
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #77 on: June 25, 2006, 03:44:55 PM »
::) I am going to need proof that your chest is 42 inches.

lol..I second that Alexx.. :-\

Dorian 01

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 818
  • Ronnie Rockel > Ronnie Coleman
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #78 on: June 25, 2006, 03:50:56 PM »
Have we ever had solid proof of any bodybuilder's measurements or weight? I saw a picture of Lee Priest measuring his arm once. That's about all I've seen that I know would be true.
T

nicorulez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
  • Getbig!
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #79 on: June 25, 2006, 03:51:12 PM »
Comparing Ron's legs to Cutler...please  ::) ::) ::) ::).  Ron's legs dwarf Gutler's.  There is only one bodypart of Cutler that beats Big Ron; his calves (and quite possibly the jaw).  Nevertheless, Ronnie will never win best wheels as it encompasses thighs, hams and calves.  He may have the best thighs and hams, but his calves aren't even on the radar.  I think it will go to Branch as he is more proportionate.  However, if his legs really are 8 inches, his waist is a legit 42 inches.  To have a taper with a 40 plus inch waist must mean his chest is easily greater than 60 inches.  :o

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #80 on: June 25, 2006, 04:38:31 PM »
i gotta a neighbor who dresses like that and it's a female    LOL

body88

  • Guest
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #81 on: June 25, 2006, 04:42:56 PM »
No the guy in the white shirt is from MM and took all these pics so u can thank him for them. He is 238lbs, and Ronnies legs are 38" pumped, your tellin me that u don't think ronnies legs can't be like 7" bigger then your average NPC superheavy weight competitor with legs around the 31-32'' mark? I mean seriously bro he even makes jay's legs look smaller.. That is not easy to do. I have 27'' legs i can easliy see how ronnies legs are just 10'' bigger.

You never said pumped. I was under the impression you were talking cold. My mistake I was wrong. I find 38 inches a little much but I guess it is very possible. I would guess  34 - 36 at most.

Not a flame on the 230 lb dude. What I meant to say comparing him to youre averege gym lifter is going to make him far huger than standing him next to a 230 lb pro. Still huge tho!

And as for Ronnie having better legs than Cutler. Never!!! Most definatly bigger but cutler has better detail and calves. Those recent pics of cuts show a monster sweep. Coupled with his deep cuts and awsome detail he wins hand down.

thisiskeith12

  • Guest
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #82 on: June 25, 2006, 06:11:08 PM »
Wow, once again, you get clear good views of his right arm and triceps, but not his left tricep.

Things that make you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmm

legbreaker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1054
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #83 on: June 25, 2006, 07:23:23 PM »
I csan believe they were 38 or so because mine were 30 and above (off season and such) and his dwarf mine.

body88

  • Guest
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #84 on: June 25, 2006, 07:33:23 PM »
I csan believe they were 38 or so because mine were 30 and above (off season and such) and his dwarf mine.

nice wheels man!

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #85 on: June 25, 2006, 07:36:42 PM »
jacked legs guy....
lookin good....
choice is an illusion

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #86 on: June 25, 2006, 07:37:58 PM »
I csan believe they were 38 or so because mine were 30 and above (off season and such) and his dwarf mine.

Next time save it at a higher resolution! We want to see the cuts bro! Nice wheels nonetheless!
just push some weight!

legbreaker

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1054
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #87 on: June 25, 2006, 07:50:08 PM »
Thanks for the positive comments. yeah, i learned a lot about digital camera settings since 04, lol.  Yeah, but Ronnie is just incredible...light years ahead of anyone in my opinion.

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5812
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #88 on: June 25, 2006, 08:08:08 PM »
Thanks for the positive comments. yeah, i learned a lot about digital camera settings since 04, lol.  Yeah, but Ronnie is just incredible...light years ahead of anyone in my opinion.
Dude loan your teardrops and sweeps to kamali will ya!

nicorulez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
  • Getbig!
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #89 on: June 25, 2006, 08:38:15 PM »
Cutler compared to Ron...that is a laugh Body88.  Turn them to the side, Jay has no hams.  They suck.  Dex kills him from the side.  Now, Tom Prince in his prime had awesome hams and legs.  Branch has awesome legs.  Jay has nice cut thighs but they pale in size and shape to Ronnies and from the side and back they are non-existent.  Most definitely a gift for best legs last year as they were throwing him a bone for getting swept by the big man.  Ron will win as long as he wants it and doesn't get injured.  I thought the left arm looked as big as the right arm.  No flexed shot, but I suspect it is not overly atrophied as all of Jay's supporters hope.

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #90 on: June 26, 2006, 04:29:39 AM »
I csan believe they were 38 or so because mine were 30 and above (off season and such) and his dwarf mine.
Good wheels!! You are a BBer.

jaejonna

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14944
  • Head Asian of Getbig
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #91 on: June 26, 2006, 07:25:59 AM »
ROnnie looks like a damn monster!!!

Dude has decent wheels!! Makes you realize that bigger isnt better, but If I had legs as big as ronnie you need a ronnnie sized upperbody to match... unfortunately you need a ronnie size gut...
L

gibberj2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2921
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #92 on: June 26, 2006, 07:35:59 AM »
look at the picture of the walking lunges from behind. his ass is huge. i think ronnie is too big. can there be such a thing? yes! if his arms grew some more that would be fine... if his delts got bigger that would be fine. if his traps got bigger that would be fine, if his back got wider and thicker even that would be fine but his thighs and ass are too big.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #93 on: June 26, 2006, 07:55:56 AM »
Quote
look at the picture of the walking lunges from behind. his ass is huge. i think ronnie is too big. can there be such a thing? yes! if his arms grew some more that would be fine... if his delts got bigger that would be fine. if his traps got bigger that would be fine, if his back got wider and thicker even that would be fine but his thighs and ass are too big.
One of his weaknesses that should've been addressed beginning 4-5 years ago was allowing the legs to stay that big-I don't think he's done everything he could do address balance issues.

Could've instead focused on quad refinement & detail and bring up the calves, making for a better look. Size was already there. No excuse; I'm surprised no one told him or that he didn't listen.

RJB

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 271
  • Everyone on the internets is rich.
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #94 on: June 26, 2006, 07:57:42 AM »
That guy looks like crap. I make that guy look like a little boy.
Ronnie looked like doodoo

HERACLES

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3025
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #95 on: June 26, 2006, 08:06:48 AM »
look at the picture of the walking lunges from behind. his ass is huge. i think ronnie is too big. can there be such a thing? yes! if his arms grew some more that would be fine... if his delts got bigger that would be fine. if his traps got bigger that would be fine, if his back got wider and thicker even that would be fine but his thighs and ass are too big.

I swear, your a total moron!  If ROnnies arms got bigger? HA! He doesnt have to get any bigger, all he has to worry about is conidtioning.

Legbreaker, AWESOME WHEELS MAN! WOWZAS!
 :o

gibberj2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2921
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #96 on: June 26, 2006, 08:13:04 AM »
ronnie is not lacking size anywhere. but it is true that his legs are too big and his ass is way too big. he wins the olympia because he gets into condition. actually very very good condition with his mass in great conditioning he can't lose to the competition he has now. i dont think he should train the way he does still. why train so heavy heavy? he'll just keep building his ass and it'll be hard to keep down the gut. he's like 5'10 or 5'11". someone like Gunter i would say is safe to get bigger. i hear he's coming in at 285 this year. forget it he can't win then. he needs to come in at 300. i think gunter should train year round. this year he took a few months off. he said he would in his probodybuilding weekly interview. he's the kinda guy who needs to get incredibly big since he has the height for it and then come down to 300. i mean if he's the same weight as ronnie and ronnie's 3 inches shorter how's he gonna beat him? gunter doesn't have such an aesthetic physique anyway.

heracles i'm not a total moron. i'm not saying he needs any sort of size i'm saying that it would be OK for those parts to get bigger but not his legs or ass. ronnie as it is obvious from those pictures is going to come in HUGE this year. as big as ever. i'm just saying that if he puts on any more size it would be fine everywhere else but his legs and ass.

HERACLES

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3025
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #97 on: June 26, 2006, 08:21:47 AM »
ronnie is not lacking size anywhere. but it is true that his legs are too big and his ass is way too big. he wins the olympia because he gets into condition. actually very very good condition with his mass in great conditioning he can't lose to the competition he has now. i dont think he should train the way he does still. why train so heavy heavy? he'll just keep building his ass and it'll be hard to keep down the gut. he's like 5'10 or 5'11". someone like Gunter i would say is safe to get bigger. i hear he's coming in at 285 this year. forget it he can't win then. he needs to come in at 300. i think gunter should train year round. this year he took a few months off. he said he would in his probodybuilding weekly interview. he's the kinda guy who needs to get incredibly big since he has the height for it and then come down to 300. i mean if he's the same weight as ronnie and ronnie's 3 inches shorter how's he gonna beat him? gunter doesn't have such an aesthetic physique anyway.

heracles i'm not a total moron. i'm not saying he needs any sort of size i'm saying that it would be OK for those parts to get bigger but not his legs or ass. ronnie as it is obvious from those pictures is going to come in HUGE this year. as big as ever. i'm just saying that if he puts on any more size it would be fine everywhere else but his legs and ass.

Ronnie always looked that HUGE in offseason before..different story contest time mate.. I just think what you right is absurd. Needing prrof his legs are 38"...dude..haha im sure hes gonna mail you proof!  You have any Idea the bar COleman set for musclarity?...And your saying his ass is too big..thats funny shit..I can see him lreading this thread and laughing at you... "wow this guy gibber is really looking into my ass too much!"

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #98 on: June 26, 2006, 08:36:01 AM »
Quote
Ronnie always looked that HUGE in offseason before..different story contest time mate.. I just think what you right is absurd. Needing prrof his legs are 38"...dude..haha im sure hes gonna mail you proof!  You have any Idea the bar COleman set for musclarity?...And your saying his ass is too big..thats funny shit..I can see him lreading this thread and laughing at you... "wow this guy gibber is really looking into my ass too much!"
Except that he's right about the balance issues, which are not bad but could be better with more refinement. Knowing that and doing something about it's one of the signs of wanting to be great, IMO. Not that his butt's so big but Coleman could've spent the last 4-5 years refining the legs and bringing them down a notch in size to better balance them with the upper body. They still look good but could have better quality, be in better balance and be accompanied by better calves. He didn't address this as well as he could've.

As far as arms, the balance could be improved a little by bringing lat width down slightly and back detail up, or bringing the arms up slightly.

HERACLES

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3025
Re: NEW PICS! WHY THEY CALL HIM KING RON!
« Reply #99 on: June 26, 2006, 10:48:31 AM »
Except that he's right about the balance issues, which are not bad but could be better with more refinement. Knowing that and doing something about it's one of the signs of wanting to be great, IMO. Not that his butt's so big but Coleman could've spent the last 4-5 years refining the legs and bringing them down a notch in size to better balance them with the upper body. They still look good but could have better quality, be in better balance and be accompanied by better calves. He didn't address this as well as he could've.

As far as arms, the balance could be improved a little by bringing lat width down slightly and back detail up, or bringing the arms up slightly.

Thats bodybuilding, we all have our different views, as the judges do, and competitors do of what is the ideal, what is "the right look"...No one is right or wrong, its just boils down to what look is preffered...to a point that is...and most significantly to judges.