Author Topic: WFA (non-spoiler)  (Read 1464 times)

torquemada

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1260
  • Billycarp ruled...
WFA (non-spoiler)
« on: July 22, 2006, 10:10:02 PM »
Better than UFC 61?  What's the GB verdict?  I thought that it was a good card overall;  some fights better than others, but that's any card.  Great main event, IMO...

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: WFA (non-spoiler)
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2006, 12:13:47 AM »
one fight in particular stood out, one of the fights of the year IMO!!!
Scouser on Tour

*ChuteBoxe*

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2429
Re: WFA (non-spoiler)
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2006, 01:19:44 AM »
I saw the event, it was a decent card.  There was a couple of alright fights, but there weren't any shockers.  Pretty much everything I expected to happen, happened.  It was still better than that garbage called UFC 61 though.
Predictions
 40/61

torquemada

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1260
  • Billycarp ruled...
Re: WFA (non-spoiler)
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2006, 07:27:40 AM »
one fight in particular stood out, one of the fights of the year IMO!!!

Talk a bout a close decision...really could've gone either way.

Scimowser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4111
  • Make them remember you
Re: WFA (non-spoiler)
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2006, 12:33:20 PM »
im guessing the late flurrys pushed it, but yeah either way would have been fine. If it had gone the other way i would have been extatic
Scouser on Tour