Author Topic: Is a six pack really necessary  (Read 8719 times)

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #25 on: August 09, 2006, 03:29:45 PM »

yet any girl in the world would choose him over a bodybuilder.

Not any.

danielson

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16640
  • Basile likes young lads
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #26 on: August 09, 2006, 03:31:28 PM »
Not any.


can you think of a girl who would take Cutler over Brad Pitt?
E

danielson

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16640
  • Basile likes young lads
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #27 on: August 09, 2006, 03:35:35 PM »
Yep, I know of about 3 at my gym.  We had this very discussion.  They thought Pitt looked like a fag.

maybe, but they are the extreme exception and you know it.
E

davidpaul

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7585
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #28 on: August 09, 2006, 04:06:14 PM »
Not really. Bret amazes us with his size, and size alone. But you can bet that if this GYM giant decided to get "ripped" and hit the stage, it would be lights out for the competition.





your holding a lot of size there bro, you should start cutting up though.

what.

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 764
  • Commercialized-ass bitch
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #29 on: August 09, 2006, 04:27:45 PM »
Some people can only naturally attain a 4 pack.  Some people have thin linea-alba's.  Some lucky bastards have an 8 pack.
Newbies: Goatboy smells

The Freakshow

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1000
  • Jeremiah 29:11-13
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #30 on: August 09, 2006, 04:32:13 PM »
YEEEEEESSSSSSS!!!!!!!

Get a six pack or go home!

This bodybuilding son. It's all about presentation ;D

NeverTrustABlonde

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 812
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #31 on: August 09, 2006, 05:53:33 PM »

can you think of a girl who would take Cutler over Brad Pitt?


.... i would....


but i'm insane, we all know this....  :-\

nycbull

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5763
  • Team Jay Should Have Won
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #32 on: August 09, 2006, 05:56:31 PM »
nahh...six packs went out with Marky Mark and his Calvin Klein Underwear ads.

Praetor Fenix

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1317
  • Capable of strong empathy and tremendous rage
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #33 on: August 09, 2006, 06:02:21 PM »
yet any girl in the world would choose him over a bodybuilder.

Due to $$$, power, fame, prestige, etc - i.e. nothing to do with physical appearance.

If Chris Cook was a prolific Hollywood personality he would effortlessly surpass Brad Pitt.
BGWell Is Back.Invariably

danielson

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16640
  • Basile likes young lads
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #34 on: August 09, 2006, 06:04:32 PM »
Due to $$$, power, fame, prestige, etc - i.e. nothing to do with physical appearance.

If Chris Cook was a prolific Hollywood personality he would effortlessly surpass Brad Pitt.

Dane Cook would pull more ass than Chris Cook, he already fucked Jess Simpson and he's pudgy. And you are delusional if you think women like meatheads.
E

Praetor Fenix

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1317
  • Capable of strong empathy and tremendous rage
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #35 on: August 09, 2006, 06:09:38 PM »
I have a buddy who has a ripped six pack and the thing is when he is fully clothed nobody looks at him while i get a lot of stares.

Attention does not necessarily indicate attraction.
Most people will take note of a muscular guy. Its fairly conspicuous.
The same way most people will readily notice a morbidly obese man enter the setting.

In my "prime", I got quite a bit of attention too due to my size, namely in the form of stupid questions and comments. However, I learned the hard way that this momentary curiosity rarely manifested itself into any real interest beyond the momentary awe.

As long as the guy isn't excessively skinny or overweight, too many other variables of greater importance are involved. The muscle turns out to be nothing more than an indifferent accessory.

BGWell Is Back.Invariably

Praetor Fenix

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1317
  • Capable of strong empathy and tremendous rage
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #36 on: August 09, 2006, 06:13:57 PM »
Dane Cook would pull more ass than Chris Cook, he already fucked Jess Simpson and he's pudgy. And you are delusional if you think women like meatheads.

You only presented another example of a mainstream media celebrity...
My point was, the $$$ and status are the primary variables, not the physical package.
BGWell Is Back.Invariably

danielson

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16640
  • Basile likes young lads
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #37 on: August 09, 2006, 06:16:17 PM »
You only presented another example of a mainstream media celebrity...
My point was, the $$$ and status are the primary variables, not the physical package.

I agree with your prior post though. There are way too many variables. But Chicks in general don't like meatheads.
E

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22045
  • #EarlToo
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #38 on: August 09, 2006, 09:26:20 PM »
all you guys saying chicks don't like bodybuilders must be skinny or fat

maybe the pros aren't the ideal for most but almost hot chicks like muscular guys

E
E

Croatch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8025
  • Man up, train natural.
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #39 on: August 09, 2006, 09:55:28 PM »
Quote
girls dont like bodybuilders. get a reality check.
Agreed.  Aside from fitness girls, most girls could care less.  Especially in a city like New York.  When I lived there in 99', I never saw so many hot girls with scrawned out Eurotrash looking guys.  Being jacked really doesn't matter, only to the person who's lifting and maybe other guys in the gym. 
N

body88

  • Guest
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #40 on: August 09, 2006, 09:59:57 PM »
Due to $$$, power, fame, prestige, etc - i.e. nothing to do with physical appearance.

If Chris Cook was a prolific Hollywood personality he would effortlessly surpass Brad Pitt.

Stop it.....



airrick

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 522
  • Treat others the way you want to be treated.
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #41 on: August 09, 2006, 11:27:42 PM »
If you are completing then you need it but if you are a recreational bodybuilder then you do not really need it because you are covered up in the gym and on the streets, girls will love your big arms and chest and when you get to the bed room and they see that you do not have a six pack at that point it does not matter.

ask girls what they like.. easy as that!

most girls will prolly say arms, and some will say abs... ima have to say abs.. chicks dig abs (aint talkin bout bob either!) lol!

younggunz

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 231
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #42 on: August 09, 2006, 11:48:35 PM »
i don't kno what you guys are talking about? i get plenty of attention from girls they love big arm's and chest, Ive had a number of incidences where i have hooked up w/ girls and it all started with a girl commenting on my body. Ive noticed it gives girl's an easy way to brake the ice. unless ur all ugly bastards

Rome

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1111
  • Pics or GTFO!
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #43 on: August 10, 2006, 04:11:36 AM »
girls dont like bodybuilders. get a reality check.
O.K I checked. WRONG!! When I was single most of the girls I fucked  were curious to see "what all those muscles could do in bed."  I never disappointed  ;D
what women SAY they like and what they REALLY like can be 2 different things. You'll learn that as soon as you start dating

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #44 on: August 10, 2006, 06:16:22 AM »
If you are completing then you need it but if you are a recreational bodybuilder then you do not really need it because you are covered up in the gym and on the streets, girls will love your big arms and chest and when you get to the bed room and they see that you do not have a six pack at that point it does not matter.

Monster excuse for being fat. Anyway, have you ever actually had a girl?
The House that Ruth built

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #45 on: August 10, 2006, 06:18:41 AM »
Check out Brad Pitt, I watched fight club four times because he looks amazing with it and those pronounced obliques

Thats scary.
The House that Ruth built

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #46 on: August 10, 2006, 06:20:46 AM »
while i get a lot of stares.

Because you are so weird looking? You claimed to be the strongest guy pound for pound on Getbig a while back didn't you?
The House that Ruth built

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #47 on: August 10, 2006, 06:22:37 AM »

can you think of a girl who would take Cutler over Brad Pitt?

Thats an extreme example. Try using a natural bodybuilder like Steve Reeves. I bet he had his share off ass and more.
The House that Ruth built

HUGEPECS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4061
  • School of Hard knocks Gym
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #48 on: August 10, 2006, 06:25:39 AM »

can you think of a girl who would take Cutler over Brad Pitt?




No, the majority of women would go for the Brad Pitt package. These are the bitches who would give you a million worthless reasons why they want the brad pitt look. These Whores, love the f. aggot look over a well built muscle machine like Jay Cutler. Who cares, Most of these Nymphos are clueless about bodybuilding
Get Big, or Die Trying

wood

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 583
Re: Is a six pack really necessary
« Reply #49 on: August 10, 2006, 06:27:21 AM »
there is absolutely no reason to bulk if you are a natural

you can maintain and build strength at sub 10% BF very easily, and getting fat is really not going to speed up your muscle growth.

All it does is give you a false sense of accomplishment watching your weight rise, not realizing that all your doing is adding lard.  If you like to eat go join a lil' debbie message board and gab with all of the other fat bitches who numb their depression with gallons of icecream and krispee kream donuts.

got a link? ;D
i