Paul Dillet VS Ronnie

[Beener]

shut up Beener - show a Canadian hero a little respect

Have you seen the movie Flubber? It's really good, its got Robbin Williams and this floating robot. Oh, and Dillet plays this weird ass green blob that is always jiggling around.

[Ex Coelis]

Have you seen the movie Flubber? It's really good, its got Robbin Williams and this floating robot. Oh, and Dillet plays this weird ass green blob that is always jiggling around.

[hardest core]

Paul is great standing there...........wonderfu l symmetry. But..........Ronnie has and will always be in another class. PERIOD!

You can say he "needs to do this...and he needs to do that"...but the point is, he DIDN'T DO IT.

[Disgusted]

Paul used steroids. 

[hardest core]

No shit Sherlock

[Disgusted]

No shit Sherlock

My name is not Sherlock. 

[the shadow]

American Muscle had a segment on Paul doing sholders prior to the 93 ASC and he's using some nice girly wieght and he says "you might be wondering why I train so light...it's about the feel and if you're laughing at me I might come through your TV and smash you!!"  or something like that.

now why the hell paul need to lift heavy when he is not training for power and he is only training to look muscular..remember paul never trained to gain power but only size..he is a bodybuilder in the true sense,lifting to gain muscle and not power..so wats the problem in that...

[the shadow]

watcht the BFTO 1996 and note how much weight paul is using for his back...I showed it to my buddy and he laughed his ass off.  Paul's is doing pulldowns one set facing the machine supersetted with one with his back to the machine..really light weight and charles glass is like "c'mon paul" between the SS cause paul is so lackadasical.

For t-bars his got maybe 100lbs..I know it's precontest but c'mon..you're almost 270lbs...

Now the BFTO1998 paul works alot harder and is alot bigger but he's not training back.

dude even he trained light it was working for him..y would he wanna lift hundreds fo pounds when he is getting the feel in few hundred pounds..he was one of the largest bodybuilders of all time and it does not matter if you lift heavy or light..its your look that counts onstage and paul dillett was always at his best..and yes his posing was alright..

[the shadow]

ronnie from the 04 russian grand prix would make paul look like a child. his legs were very small in that clip to go along with his back. his delts and arms were the only freaky muscles i saw. his waist is small as well, but ronnie is much more of a freak just watch the video.

dude till 1999,paul virtually dwarfed ronnie from every angel..just go back and see pauls posing from from 1994 to 1999 mr olympia and ronnie looked like lil bitch next to paul.even at mr olympia 1999 wich ronnie won paul mde big ron look like lil ron..all he needed was to improve his back and thats it..if he had a back ronnie would have never ever been mr olympia

[the shadow]

here is paul dillett posing at mr olympia 1999..

vs
ronnie coleman at mr olympia 1999

paul just dwarfs ronnie...ronnie only has a better back than paul and thats it..paul owns ronnie...

[the shadow]

pual dillett was always big and wide..coleman was not even close.here is paul dillet posing at mr olympia 1994

&mode=related&search=
vs
ronnie coleman posing at mr olympia 2003

paul dillet just owns ronnie in every body part except the back..sad paul was never mr olympia..making 287lbs of ronnie look like 247lbs...

[phyxsius]

pual dillett was always big and wide..coleman was not even close.here is paul dillet posing at mr olympia 1994

Both are links of Ronnie..

[the shadow]

Both are links of Ronnie..

sorry my bad..here ya go

&mode=related&search=

[caseyviator]

His posing routine just sucks to the max but you can't deny his awesome muscle size and maturity..

Compare him and Ronnie Coleman, muscles alone, I think Paul will win hands down..

how can u say that   maybe from the front alittle close in size but ronns back n overall striations,superation n shape are tremendously better by far

what r u watchin when u say this   
n im not a ron fan at all!!

would like to hear ur reasons?

[the shadow]

how can u say that   maybe from the front alittle close in size but ronns back n overall striations,superation n shape are tremendously better by far

what r u watchin when u say this   
n im not a ron fan at all!!

would like to hear ur reasons?

from the front paul blows ronnie away..its no contest man..pauls big chest,big delts,big arms and balanced legs are just too much for big ron to handle

[bigmc]

Ron himself said when asked who he thought could beat him

if dillet ever learns to pose im in trouble

from the man himself

[J. Chimpo]

Itīs not just the posing, if you look at his back its so incomplete itīs not even funny, great great hamstrings and calves but the rest have the look of a amateur. he canīt and will never get better it is the same way Dorian never could get bigger arms, and Iīm sure he tried his best.

[suckmymuscle]

  I'm shocked! Huckster still hasen't posted on this thread! Oh, I forgot: he went on a fishing trip with his buddy Poopster, a la "Brokeback Mountain".(well, that's what he said he was going to do, on the truce thread)!

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[Necrosis]

ronnie is far more conditoined in the videos you posted, his arms have way more seperation and detail. ronnies quads taped out at 38-39 inches recently, are you going to tell me that pauls legs were even close to that. they dont look that impressive to me. his arms and delts are great, and his chest is mediocre, i wathced the pre-judging at that show, put both those guys together and you'll understand why ronnie is far superior.

[Necrosis]

here you go, ronnie still with better detail and seperation. he's a monster.

[Necrosis]

paul was great but ronnie has surpassed him in sheer mass. his legs cripple pauls. and in the video i posted you cant deny how much thincker ronnie is than paul.

[natural al]

here you go, ronnie still with better detail and seperation. he's a monster.

Ronnie is a monster but Paul's physique was the only one "capable" of matching him, Paul put on alot of size and still kept his waist under control for the most part, now I don't know if paul would have ended up doing the same things ronnie did and maybe Paul's gut would have gotten just as bad but there is no doubt in my mind that if paul had gotten his act together he would have been right up there.

[Necrosis]

Ronnie is a monster but Paul's physique was the only one "capable" of matching him, Paul put on alot of size and still kept his waist under control for the most part, now I don't know if paul would have ended up doing the same things ronnie did and maybe Paul's gut would have gotten just as bad but there is no doubt in my mind that if paul had gotten his act together he would have been right up there.

i totally agree with your statement. although those that claim paul had more size then ronnie are foolish, paul is taller and has a bigger structure but ronnie has more mass. pauls arms and delts can match ronnies although they are no were near as conditioned.

[the shadow]

ronnie is far more conditoined in the videos you posted, his arms have way more seperation and detail. ronnies quads taped out at 38-39 inches recently, are you going to tell me that pauls legs were even close to that. they dont look that impressive to me. his arms and delts are great, and his chest is mediocre, i wathced the pre-judging at that show, put both those guys together and you'll understand why ronnie is far superior.

dude paul was the first real freak in bodybuilding.even before dorian paul was the real freak.paul virtually owned ronnie till 1999.dude the videos do not lie.pauls legs were huge but were not as big as colemans but they were well conditioned at the same time..paul had a wide and a thick chest.dude in 1994 paul ass raped coleman.paul actually looked twice his size at olympia 1994.and the funny thing is paul was younger than coleman.the only thing in wich coleman was big was only his back and thats it.paul was super wide and super thick..dude just go and watch arnold classic 1997, he made coleman look like a lil bicth.paul was super big and also under-rated...he was overlooked.the physiue that paul had it was easy to say he was destined to be mr olympia..damn he just got bigger every year and never added an inch to his waist.he had that freaky mass with the smallest waist possible.i have never seen any mass monster with a waist as small as pauls.paul was the true super freak.during that time there were alot of mass monsters who got bigger and at the same time getting their waist lines bigger..paul was not like that..pauls waist was so small that the rest of him looked even freakier.i hope in comes in tip-top shape at this years montreal pro
TEAM FREAKENSTEIN

[Xecutioner]

Paul's waist, being as small as it was, made him look ridiculously large. After having seen all these guys, Coleman, Ruhl, DJ, Cutler, etc I've become somewhat desensitized to these astonishingly large physiques. However, that being said, every once in a while another picture of Paul will surface, one that I have not yet seen, and the reaction it evokes is the same every time, "holy shit".

He's the closest thing to a cartoon character that I have ever seen.