Paul Dillet VS Ronnie

[the shadow]

Paul's waist, being as small as it was, made him look ridiculously large. After having seen all these guys, Coleman, Ruhl, DJ, Cutler, etc I've become somewhat desensitized to these astonishingly large physiques. However, that being said, every once in a while another picture of Paul will surface, one that I have not yet seen, and the reaction it evokes is the same every time, "holy shit".

He's the closest thing to a cartoon character that I have ever seen.

correct

[willie mosconi]

shut up Beener - show a Canadian hero a little respect

what the hell is up with the sounds in the background? The heavy breathing and "oh God"? Sounds like some dude was spanking it while watching these videos 

[Necrosis]

stop with the paul coulda woulda shit, face it he never. answer this question and then stop the debate, does a 300 pound contest conditioned ronnie coleman carrry more muscle then an in shape at any point paul dillett. yes or no.  ronnie has surpased everyone in muscle size no matter who coulda been bigger, ronnie did it end of story.

[the shadow]

stop with the paul coulda woulda shit, face it he never. answer this question and then stop the debate, does a 300 pound contest conditioned ronnie coleman carrry more muscle then an in shape at any point paul dillett. yes or no.  ronnie has surpased everyone in muscle size no matter who coulda been bigger, ronnie did it end of story.

dude long before ronnie became a 300 pounder there was paul dillet.paul was the first mass freak.he made every pro look like a small child.had he improved his back by just 10% he would have been mr olympia 20 times in a row.he filled the criteria of a perfect mr olympia.he had a small waist,big delts,big arms,amazing legs and a big chest to go with that..wheres the flaw man..and yes paul was always 270 plus onstage and stil looked bigger than a 300lb ronnie coleman

[figgs]

dude long before ronnie became a 300 pounder there was paul dillet.paul was the first mass freak.he made every pro look like a small child.had he improved his back by just 10% he would have been mr olympia 20 times in a row.he filled the criteria of a perfect mr olympia.he had a small waist,big delts,big arms,amazing legs and a big chest to go with that..wheres the flaw man..and yes paul was always 270 plus onstage and stil looked bigger than a 300lb ronnie coleman

Will someone please post the picture of Dorian and Paul comparing most musculars?!

[donpedro]

I've always wondered what's upp with his freaky veins - do some ppl "just have them", or are they the result of substance abuse gone bad in some way?

Yes, I am a newbie, so don't hate on me for asking!

[IFBBwannaB]

I've always wondered what's upp with his freaky veins - do some ppl "just have them", or are they the result of substance abuse gone bad in some way?

Yes, I am a newbie, so don't hate on me for asking!

Unless ther was some MMMMAJOR fuckup thats 100% genetic.

[Scimowser]

Dillet smashes Ronnie in regards to overall leg development, his stomach is infinitely better, his shoulders are wider than Ronnies stomach circumfrance, his arms are a legit 24" atleast and his chest was excellent. Ronnie wipes his arse with him in regards to back development so how can you say Ronnie has surpassed everyone in regards to mass? Dillet made even Dorian look small

[the shadow]

Dillet smashes Ronnie in regards to overall leg development, his stomach is infinitely better, his shoulders are wider than Ronnies stomach circumfrance, his arms are a legit 24" atleast and his chest was excellent. Ronnie wipes his arse with him in regards to back development so how can you say Ronnie has surpassed everyone in regards to mass? Dillet made even Dorian look small

one of the best posts ever...

[Bear]

one of the best posts ever...

You're gay

[sandstone]

Dilletts neck looked like a bunched up tube sock while his teeth resembled a picket fence on the beach.. Ugly Mo Fo

[Necrosis]

yes shadow paul was amazing, his 0 olympia titles trump ronnies 8. ronnie is clearly has more muscle mass all over, dillett had a bigger structure. pauls arms were bigger then ronnies yes but ronnies are much more conditioined. ronnies legs are much bigger then pauls who can match ronnie is shear thigh size. when did this thread turn into quality i thought we were talking about quanity, paul has great overall leg development yes, however ronnies quads are bigger. face the truth pauls legs never taped out at 38 inches, even in the offseason. and ronnies back makes pauls look like a school girl.

[Scimowser]

ronnie has bigger quads but their quality is poor, they have little seperation these days. Paul had better hamstrings and the calves shouldnt EVER be brought into question. Ronnie has the worst calves of any pro in the top 10 today. So yes, granted Ronnies quad size is unmatched but for overall balance and symmetry Dillet has the better leg structure.

[chris_mason]

Paul has amazing shoulders, arms, and a very good chest.  He also has excellent calves.  I would say he compares very favorably with Ronnie from the front but gets SMOKED from the back.  

[the shadow]

yes shadow paul was amazing, his 0 olympia titles trump ronnies 8. ronnie is clearly has more muscle mass all over, dillett had a bigger structure. pauls arms were bigger then ronnies yes but ronnies are much more conditioined. ronnies legs are much bigger then pauls who can match ronnie is shear thigh size. when did this thread turn into quality i thought we were talking about quanity, paul has great overall leg development yes, however ronnies quads are bigger. face the truth pauls legs never taped out at 38 inches, even in the offseason. and ronnies back makes pauls look like a school girl.

in the words of lee haney..its about quality and not quantity..and yet paul had both quantity and quality.ronnie only has quantity but no fuckin quality.ronnie only had quality in his back and thats it and if you are saying pauls arms are not well condtioned,you are absolutely blind.heres pauls perfect 24 inch guns..amazing size and conditioning

[the shadow]

ronnie has bigger quads but their quality is poor, they have little seperation these days. Paul had better hamstrings and the calves shouldnt EVER be brought into question. Ronnie has the worst calves of any pro in the top 10 today. So yes, granted Ronnies quad size is unmatched but for overall balance and symmetry Dillet has the better leg structure.

one of the most rational posts on this thread.these coleman asslickers just don't get the fact that there are bigger and well conditioned pros than coleman.. heres a message to
coleman asslickers....
THE TRUTH IS PAUL HAS BETTER SIZE AND SHAPE THAN RONNIE..THATS THE TRUTH!!!YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH..END OF STORY

[the shadow]

Paul has amazing shoulders, arms, and a very good chest.  He also has excellent calves.  I would say he compares very favorably with Ronnie from the front but gets SMOKED from the back.  

compares hahah.paul was light years ahead of coleman till 1999 from the front.after 1999 paul just sort of retired.if he had continued his 1999 form he would have smoked coleman and yes with a bit of back improvement..

[chris_mason]

compares hahah.paul was light years ahead of coleman till 1999 from the front.after 1999 paul just sort of retired.if he had continued his 1999 form he would have smoked coleman and yes with a bit of back improvement..

Yet Paul won nothing.  He did not beat the best of his day.  I saw Paul at Gold's in Venice circa 1991 and he was AMAZING.  I think it was a lack of work ethic and will that kept him from being the best.

[the shadow]

Yet Paul won nothing.  He did not beat the best of his day.  I saw Paul at Gold's in Venice circa 1991 and he was AMAZING.  I think it was a lack of work ethic and will that kept him from being the best.

i think so he lifted light because it worked for him..his work ethic was ok.and the only thing he needed was back and thats it..if he even had a back like jp fux or nasser el sonbaty he would have  been mr olympia forever..

[chris_mason]

i think so he lifted light because it worked for him..his work ethic was ok.and the only thing he needed was back and thats it..if he even had a back like jp fux or nasser el sonbaty he would have  been mr olympia forever..

I don't agree about the work ethic.  If he had the will he would have learned how to pose and he would have improved his back.  The fact he didn't indicates to me he was lacking in desire and the will to do what must be done. 

Who knows?  I don't know the man I could be wrong but that is what is looks like from the outside.

[G o a t b o y]

I don't agree about the work ethic.  If he had the will he would have learned how to pose and he would have improved his back.  The fact he didn't indicates to me he was lacking in desire and the will to do what must be done. 

Who knows?  I don't know the man I could be wrong but that is what is looks like from the outside.

Dillet was the kind of guy who would take 80 hours to do a 40-hour job! 

[pobrecito]

i think so he lifted light because it worked for him..his work ethic was ok.and the only thing he needed was back and thats it..if he even had a back like jp fux or nasser el sonbaty he would have  been mr olympia forever..

Paul's back sucked horrendusly. It was the worst back on the olympia stage any given time he competed. A baby's but had more detail than Dillet's back. And you know why? Becuase he trained like a pussy. 1, you have Coleman deadlifting 800lbs and doing 495lb barbell rows 5 weeks out compared to Dillet 95lb machine pulldowns which he didn't even execute properly. 

[the shadow]

Paul's back sucked horrendusly. It was the worst back on the olympia stage any given time he competed. A baby's but had more detail than Dillet's back. And you know why? Becuase he trained like a pussy. 1, you have Coleman deadlifting 800lbs and doing 495lb barbell rows 5 weeks out compared to Dillet 95lb machine pulldowns which he didn't even execute properly. 

paul only had one weakness and i admit that his back was not at par with ronnie.like i said if he improved his back by  just 10% he owuld have had been mr olympia forever.and you know the fact that paul from the front just owned ronnie from every angel...

[Necrosis]

in the words of lee haney..its about quality and not quantity..and yet paul had both quantity and quality.ronnie only has quantity but no fuckin quality.ronnie only had quality in his back and thats it and if you are saying pauls arms are not well condtioned,you are absolutely blind.heres pauls perfect 24 inch guns..amazing size and conditioning

you are a meatbag, paul never had more quality then ronnie or he would of won something. ronnies has way more seperation and detail then paul will ever have. your a fucking guy, did you ever think that maybe he couldnt get better. keep suggesting he would ruled the world while people like ronnie get it done and become 9 times mr o.

[pobrecito]

paul only had one weakness and i admit that his back was not at par with ronnie.like i said if he improved his back by  just 10% he owuld have had been mr olympia forever.and you know the fact that paul from the front just owned ronnie from every angel...

no To become Mr. Olympia you must have the best back on the Olympia stage. Something Dillet never ever would have. Plus, he had way too much synthol in his rear delts.