Author Topic: Steve Kuclo Vs Flex Louis (Read 12594 times)

Knows_Everything · « **on:** August 13, 2006, 05:43:27 PM »

Steve is 21 years old and Flex is 22 years old. Both have great physiques. IMO Steve has a more balance and pleasing physique. And Flex has more mass and size, but its not well balanced. They both are jacked up! at such a young age it's crazy!

Discuss.

JediKnight · « **Reply #1 on:** August 13, 2006, 05:45:25 PM »

neither of those guys will ever turn pro or if they do, they will not do a thing in the pro ranks.

natural al · « **Reply #2 on:** August 13, 2006, 05:48:09 PM »

I "think" steve is only 20, that's pretty damn young to be winning an open class and an over all. I like Flex, he seems like he's a good guy from what I have read.

Quote from: JediKnight on August 13, 2006, 05:45:25 PM

neither of those guys will ever turn pro or if they do, they will not do a thing in the pro ranks.

I'll disagree, I think they both have a good shot at being a pro.....why do you think otherwise? I'd like to know your logic behind that statement.

JediKnight · « **Reply #3 on:** August 13, 2006, 05:49:24 PM »

look at the current top 5 or even top 10 in the pro ranks,,,those guys are MONSTERS,,,Flex Louis and Steve are babies compared to the Giants

JediKnight · « **Reply #4 on:** August 13, 2006, 05:51:25 PM »

Jay Cutler was 26 and Phil Heath was 26 when they turned pro and they are light years ahead of those guys when they turned pro

Knows_Everything · « **Reply #5 on:** August 13, 2006, 05:54:25 PM »

legs comparison

Knows_Everything · « **Reply #6 on:** August 13, 2006, 05:56:12 PM »

abs thigh comparison

davidpaul · « **Reply #7 on:** August 13, 2006, 05:57:54 PM »

Flex is more developed, partly due to being in the game longer.

Knows_Everything · « **Reply #8 on:** August 13, 2006, 05:58:52 PM »

To me it looks like Steve is just using steroids, and Flex could be using steroids, GH and insulin. As you can see Flex's midsection is much thicker then steve's.

pobrecito · « **Reply #9 on:** August 13, 2006, 05:59:46 PM »

it's refreshing to actually see some guys with good calf development...it completes the physique. With our current Mr. Olympia having no calves it's almost as if they have become unimportant $:-\$

Knows_Everything · « **Reply #10 on:** August 13, 2006, 06:01:17 PM »

Quote from: davidpaul on August 13, 2006, 05:57:54 PM

Flex is more developed, partly due to being in the game longer.

I think Steve has been competing just as long as Flex has?

davidpaul · « **Reply #11 on:** August 13, 2006, 06:02:13 PM »

Quote from: Knows_Everything on August 13, 2006, 06:01:17 PM

I think Steve has been competing just as long as Flex has?

Flex has been juicing longer, wasn't Steve a natty before?

Knows_Everything · « **Reply #12 on:** August 13, 2006, 06:03:23 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on August 13, 2006, 06:00:38 PM

It sucks that we can't know what these guys would look like off gear. I want to see how these guys (or any bodybuilders for that matter) would fare without gear. That would be inspiration to me, even if they are much smaller.

take about 40lbs of muscle of there frames and that should give u an idea of what they would look like.

Knows_Everything · « **Reply #13 on:** August 13, 2006, 06:05:03 PM »

Quote from: davidpaul on August 13, 2006, 06:02:13 PM

Flex has been juicing longer, wasn't Steve a natty before?

yeh i guess he was natty from what i herd maybe like a year ago.? So how long do you think flex has been juicing? Since 18?

Matt C · « **Reply #14 on:** August 13, 2006, 06:06:12 PM »

brianX · « **Reply #15 on:** August 13, 2006, 06:07:38 PM »

Quote from: Knows_Everything on August 13, 2006, 06:03:23 PM

take about 40lbs of muscle of there frames and that should give u an idea of what they would look like.

Is that a fact?

brianX · « **Reply #16 on:** August 13, 2006, 06:14:38 PM »

I remember seeing a bunch of photos of him on Muscle Mayhem. He looked very big before taking steroids. Something like 220 lb with abs and intercostals. His arms looked to be around 18".

Bast000 · « **Reply #17 on:** August 13, 2006, 06:20:49 PM »

he competed at 219lbs at 6ft at only 19 years old.(according to repetrope.com)

Steve Reeves was 6 1" 215lbs and not as lean as Kuclo.

Adam Empire · « **Reply #18 on:** August 13, 2006, 06:34:31 PM »

These guys juicing so young is nuts. It's not like they are just starting now - they have been for quite a while (even when their bodies were at their natural test level highs). Why?

Palpatine Q · « **Reply #19 on:** August 13, 2006, 06:47:47 PM »

I think the Kuclo dude is genetically head and shoulders better than Louis. In time he will surpass him.

Adam Empire · « **Reply #20 on:** August 13, 2006, 07:34:18 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on August 13, 2006, 06:52:40 PM

I don't understand this argument. People always say that young guys shouldn't juice because their test is at its peak. Well when they turn 23 and start juicing they end up being on 10 times the test they were on even at their peak. It's not like a male's natural test peak is anything close to what bodybuilders use for an anabolic effect.

There are more sound reasons for not juicing at a young age: hormonal manipulation at that age is bad and may result in some long term problems and closing of the growth plates is a real thing.

The argument "your test is high already" is a silly argument. Nobody goes on juice to get their levels back to what they were at age 18 - they use much more juice than that.

I understand what you are saying - and I think we agree actually. The point I was really trying to make is that why start so young - especially when other things can go wrong (it's not like they can't build great muscle with their peak test levels anyway, so why add the drugs so young...).

It's almost like they are trying to do too much too quickly. I just don't see why any teen cannot keep lifting into their early 20s without making good gains - then start the juice perhaps. Why burn out the receptors if you can make the gains anyway (and why put their young organs through the tough orals...).

Just seems to me that if you can make gains naturally, why start so early? (Just to keep up with the Jonses?)

whitewidow · « **Reply #21 on:** August 13, 2006, 09:35:53 PM »

flex's calfs and forarms are better than most pros- his calfs are seriously insane- but structurly I think that steve kid is better-

Van_Bilderass · « **Reply #22 on:** August 13, 2006, 09:50:47 PM »

I think Flex started the juice much earlier and is doing heavier dosages at this point. I think Steve will make some major gains in the near future. I see him going much further than Lewis. Much better structure.

gh15 · « **Reply #23 on:** August 13, 2006, 10:29:28 PM »

both will get the pro card since both are very young. the steve kid will be be top contender in O within 10 years

Croatch · « **Reply #24 on:** August 13, 2006, 10:35:06 PM »

I would go with Flex. Seeing he has Milos as his advisor, you know his gear is far more dialed.

Author Topic: Steve Kuclo Vs Flex Louis (Read 12594 times)

whitewidow