Your public comments here regarding the Vince issue. You have been smug and not much else. At no stage during your initial time did you suggest that Vince had not signed a contract.
Your public comments here regarding lee priest - poor businessman, poor ethics etc etc
What I'm saying here is that you went above your general IFBB man prattle to criticise Lee Priest on grounds of general business practice. When confronted with the idea that an athlete was going to do the same thing to the PDI you reacted like a smug git. I don't care about the fact that you're an IFBB man, YOU brought the discussion into the realm of business ethics last year and thus you are held accountable for using the same standards of "attack" in determining whether it was the right thing to do.
Oh and for reference purposes Chick also mistakenly defended Tom Prince when he accused getbig of fabricated his rant about "backing titus up" against that UFC fighter. He was wrong about that one but probably more so believing Tom over multitudes of people, many of which do not even read getbig 
Vince DID sign a contract...he said so himself. Unfortunately, there were things promised to Vince that never materialized, thus voiding the contract, and making Vince re-evaluate the situation...same goes for Vinny G.
The Olympia contract is in plain black and white, and delivered on everything promised in it...it was LEE that bailed for his OWN reasons...none of thm having anything to do with the IFBB or the promoter, not coming through on what they promised on their end....
As for Lee being a poor businessman...HE ridiculed the other Pro's for not bothering to read the contract, signing it, and sending it in...yet, said he read it, understood it and signed it anyway even though he didn't agree with what he was signing...you do the math.
As for the Tom Prince thread...it was never posted by Tom, fool. All anyone seen was some phoney posting under a BOGUS account...Why would TP have offered to defend Titus when he hated his guys?
