Author Topic: luke wood SUPER DELTS.. (Read 6058 times)

Bast000 · « **Reply #25 on:** August 15, 2006, 12:02:07 PM »

Quote from: growthfactor on August 15, 2006, 11:35:58 AM

how come luke normally doesn't place well?... is there something fundamentally wrong with his structure? or are the judges just being retards?

wide waist, high lats, weird shaped arms.

Captain Equipoise · « **Reply #26 on:** August 15, 2006, 12:27:35 PM »

His structure reminds me of Atwood there..esp. the waist/lats/chest

IFBBwannaB · « **Reply #27 on:** August 15, 2006, 04:00:32 PM »

Quote from: alexxx on August 15, 2006, 10:48:45 AM

Luke is big all over you.

Translation: I sucked him and enjoyed every moment of it.

Robbie · « **Reply #28 on:** August 15, 2006, 04:33:49 PM »

Without doubt, his best body part.

phyxsius · « **Reply #29 on:** August 15, 2006, 05:03:09 PM »

Quote from: Captain Equipoise on August 15, 2006, 12:27:35 PM

His structure reminds me of Atwood there..esp. the waist/lats/chest

He looked way better than Art

Croatch · « **Reply #30 on:** August 15, 2006, 05:07:04 PM »

Luke,
Why don't you keep it real and lay out exactly what you take to get that size. I'm curious as to the extent of gh/drug usage that is required to attain that amount of size, assuming you have the genetics to work with. Forget diet, training etc. Just put down the cold facts, you'll be given credit across the board for an honest answer. I know not cycle would put anyone there, but for example years of what types of cycles and the amounts while on. Hell, if I were on, I tell people what I was taking...even it's only that persons business. This is a bodybuilding board and steroids are the most scrutinized thing on here. Regardless of someone being natural or not, it would be a service to know this. If you choose not to answer, explain why. Thanks, Croatch

The True Adonis · « **Reply #31 on:** August 15, 2006, 05:09:03 PM »

Quote from: Croatch on August 15, 2006, 05:07:04 PM

Luke,
Why don't you keep it real and lay out exactly what you take to get that size. I'm curious as to the extent of gh/drug usage that is required to attain that amount of size, assuming you have the genetics to work with. Forget diet, training etc. Just put down the cold facts, you'll be given credit across the board for an honest answer. I know not cycle would put anyone there, but for example years of what types of cycles and the amounts while on. Hell, if I were on, I tell people what I was taking...even it's only that persons business. This is a bodybuilding board and steroids are the most scrutinized thing on here. Regardless of someone being natural or not, it would be a service to know this. If you choose not to answer, explain why. Thanks, Croatch

Why weren`t you more forthcoming regarding your previous drug use?

Just curious?

Croatch · « **Reply #32 on:** August 15, 2006, 05:20:14 PM »

Quote

Why weren`t you more forthcoming regarding your previous drug use?

Just curious?

If my current gains had anything to do with doing one cycle in 94', I would have been more open about it. The problem with that is, people assume your gains came from gear, if you touched it just once. I retained none of the gains and stopped lifting even for a period of years, then started back, then took a few years off again, then began in 2002 at 150lbs roughly. So, I attribute none of my current gains with drug use. Sure, some people will say it alters your DNA etc, basically just to knock any natural gains you've acquired. Would I say I've been natural my whole life, of course not. I would consider myself natural though because every pound I put on my frame from 150lbs has been without drugs. Some may call it clean or natural, it doesn't matter to me. At the end of the day, I know where my gains lie and can say from experience, I'd rather gain 5lbs natural, than 20lbs on gear.
And when my buddy posted a pic of me at 18yrs old, I could have said nothing, but I'm not dishonest and never claimed to never have taken a cycle. It was so long ago, it was irrelevant to my gains today because I kept zero. For the most part, I'm against any kind of drug use and roids are just another drug to me.

Robbie · « **Reply #33 on:** August 15, 2006, 05:21:40 PM »

Quote from: The True Adonis on August 15, 2006, 05:09:03 PM

Why weren`t you more forthcoming regarding your previous drug use?

Just curious?

Lol

dav-bol · « **Reply #34 on:** August 15, 2006, 07:17:14 PM »

Quote from: Croatch on August 15, 2006, 05:07:04 PM

Luke,
Why don't you keep it real and lay out exactly what you take to get that size. I'm curious as to the extent of gh/drug usage that is required to attain that amount of size, assuming you have the genetics to work with. Forget diet, training etc. Just put down the cold facts, you'll be given credit across the board for an honest answer. I know not cycle would put anyone there, but for example years of what types of cycles and the amounts while on. Hell, if I were on, I tell people what I was taking...even it's only that persons business. This is a bodybuilding board and steroids are the most scrutinized thing on here. Regardless of someone being natural or not, it would be a service to know this. If you choose not to answer, explain why. Thanks, Croatch

bumping this ^^^^^^^

Luke Wood · « **Reply #35 on:** August 15, 2006, 08:14:37 PM »

Thankyou guys very much for the thread!!!! I do go heavier than 75lb dumbells, but not always! I may use them as a second or third exercise and 75lbs is plenty. I will just rep them out to failure and the burn is incredible!! also though if i choose to use this lighter weight as a first exercise i will do them very slowly and after 8 - 10 reps i have gone to failure, just by counting to 6 seconds on the way down and 6 seconds on the way up! doing it this way you will still experince incredible pumps and muscle growth!

Luke Wood · « **Reply #36 on:** August 15, 2006, 08:16:47 PM »

Quote from: Croatch on August 15, 2006, 05:07:04 PM

Luke,
Why don't you keep it real and lay out exactly what you take to get that size. I'm curious as to the extent of gh/drug usage that is required to attain that amount of size, assuming you have the genetics to work with. Forget diet, training etc. Just put down the cold facts, you'll be given credit across the board for an honest answer. I know not cycle would put anyone there, but for example years of what types of cycles and the amounts while on. Hell, if I were on, I tell people what I was taking...even it's only that persons business. This is a bodybuilding board and steroids are the most scrutinized thing on here. Regardless of someone being natural or not, it would be a service to know this. If you choose not to answer, explain why. Thanks, Croatch

Thanks Croatch but no thanks!

use your imagination instead!

Start with Muscletech products!!

Croatch · « **Reply #37 on:** August 15, 2006, 08:51:01 PM »

Quote

If you choose not to answer, explain why. Thanks, Croatch

Not some long paragraph, just a brief sentence or two. Legal reasons or because you don't want people to say, oh it take 7000mg of test to get that way, no wonder why. Monster reality.
Just joking, but if you could explain why, I'd appreciate it.

dzulboy · « **Reply #38 on:** August 15, 2006, 10:13:21 PM »

Quote from: growthfactor on August 15, 2006, 11:35:58 AM

how come luke normally doesn't place well?... is there something fundamentally wrong with his structure? or are the judges just being retards?

his front double bi pose SUCKS and his abs are weak othe rthen that he's pretty damn good but if he ever breaks top 5 i will be amazed

vein-x · « **Reply #39 on:** August 15, 2006, 10:44:56 PM »

...wow!

Something about this one I thought was cool... could be the conditioning.. I dunno...

jaejonna · « **Reply #40 on:** August 16, 2006, 06:31:13 AM »

Luke does it take away from your training when Milos ask you to babysit flex jimmyhat lewis ?

Discuss....

Croatch · « **Reply #41 on:** August 16, 2006, 06:40:31 AM »

Quote

Thanks Croatch but no thanks! use your imagination instead!

Start with Muscletech products!!

I started taking another scoop of Nitrotech as of today. I'll fill you in on my progress.
It says you can gain 8.4lbs in 2 weeks! I think they might be putting the the special "Milos Blend" in the powder. Thanks Muscletech!
They should have a product called "Striated". It consists of 2 parts "Milos Blend" 1 part fish oil. You can endorse it with that cable curl shot. Supplements rock!

Luke Wood · « **Reply #42 on:** August 16, 2006, 07:36:48 PM »

Quote from: Croatch on August 16, 2006, 06:40:31 AM

I started taking another scoop of Nitrotech as of today. I'll fill you in on my progress.
It says you can gain 8.4lbs in 2 weeks! I think they might be putting the the special "Milos Blend" in the powder. Thanks Muscletech!
They should have a product called "Striated". It consists of 2 parts "Milos Blend" 1 part fish oil. You can endorse it with that cable curl shot. Supplements rock!

LOL!!! If Muscletech needed someone to further enhance there knowledge and make even more awsome supps, than Milos would be the man to do that!!

Luke Wood · « **Reply #43 on:** August 16, 2006, 07:38:56 PM »

Quote from: jaejonna on August 16, 2006, 06:31:13 AM

Luke does it take away from your training when Milos ask you to babysit flex jimmyhat lewis ?

Discuss....

i have never baby sitted for Flex, but if i had too (never would happen as he is 22 yrs old

) i would have no problem. I consider both Flex and Milos family so there is nothing i wouldn't do for them!

Van_Bilderass · « **Reply #44 on:** August 16, 2006, 08:02:45 PM »

No offence to Luke but he has a very "strange" looking skull. Any pics of him when he was younger (to see if it changed shape)?