Author Topic: Batistas big 3 lifts  (Read 9679 times)

Oldschool Flip

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3309
  • Eat Balut! High in Protein!
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #25 on: August 21, 2006, 08:20:52 AM »
In 2002 Bastisa was working out at World Gym in Sterling (now closed) and was curling 225 for 6 reps. Had a little swing, but nothing that would regulate it as cheating. He's a real nice guy too. Struck up a conversation with him and we both talked about food because we are of the same decent (he's half Filipino). When he's in the DC area I think he works out at Gold's in Tysons now.

Joey Tito

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1006
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #26 on: August 21, 2006, 11:18:43 AM »
It never seeks to amaze me that anyone would put up a # like 0 bodyfat.  You'd be dead.  Even rotting corps's have a higher % than 0.  3-4 is super shredded, you know that, 0 impossible.  What would it be after a 1/2 hour grewling match?  -2%? 

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #27 on: August 21, 2006, 11:20:45 AM »
Oh brother ::)

luv2build

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 339
  • Getbig!
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #28 on: August 21, 2006, 11:48:58 AM »
Oh brother ::)


You truly are an IDIOT if you ever believe that someone is 0% bodyfat.  it is not possible.  top competitors are around 3-4%  the only way to acheive 0% is when you are DEAD and a box of BONES.
MORON...

Gee i believe everything i read, and hear.
I have a special drink that will make you HUGE only $1,000,000.00  let me know when you are ready to buy it

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #29 on: August 21, 2006, 11:51:58 AM »

You truly are an IDIOT if you ever believe that someone is 0% bodyfat.  it is not possible.  top competitors are around 3-4%  the only way to acheive 0% is when you are DEAD and a box of BONES.
MORON...
Gee i believe everything i read, and hear.
I have a special drink that will make you HUGE only $1,000,000.00  let me know when you are ready to buy it

Are you for real ? It's not me who's claiming that you nimrod. JIM QUINN himself said that, on ESPN and it was BILLY SMITH who measured it. I don't see what the big deal is with someone measuring 0.00 %, given the drugs and stuff nowadays. It was only a matter of time before someone achieved that low a bodyfat level.

BTW, Flex Wheeler too has been known to achieve 0.00 % bodyfat. So there.

luv2build

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 339
  • Getbig!
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #30 on: August 21, 2006, 11:55:41 AM »
Are you for real ? It's not me who's claiming that you nimrod. JIM QUINN himself said that, on ESPN and it was BILLY SMITH who measured it. I don't see what the big deal is with someone measuring 0.00 %, given the drugs and stuff nowadays. It was only a matter of time before someone achieved that low a bodyfat level.

BTW, Flex Wheeler too has been known to achieve 0.00 % bodyfat. So there.

And you know all of this because you witnessed it yourself???  dont believe everything you hear on tv and read in the magazines.  Remember all that weapons of mass destruction stuff?  Yeah that came from the leader of this nation.  people lie all the time OPEN YOUR EYES

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #31 on: August 21, 2006, 11:59:27 AM »
And you know all of this because you witnessed it yourself???  dont believe everything you hear on tv and read in the magazines.  Remember all that weapons of mass destruction stuff?  Yeah that came from the leader of this nation.  people lie all the time OPEN YOUR EYES

For F*ck sakes  >:( Are you now stupid enough to say that Jim Quinn, who's never been known to lie or even exaggerate, would lie about such a thing, especially on TV ? Not to mention that if you are right, it would mean a) Billy Smith is lying too and b) Flex Wheeler didn't achieve 0.00 % bodyfat levels either. Hahahahaha you are a retard.

Captain Equipoise

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12927
  • back from the dead...
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #32 on: August 21, 2006, 12:12:26 PM »
LOL, pwned.

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #33 on: August 21, 2006, 12:16:29 PM »
LOL, pwned.

Thanks man. It's people like luv2build who actually prevent mankind from making progress. I firmly believe in the not-too-distant future, bodybuilders will actually compete at NEGATIVE bodyfat levels, due to scientific advancements by the leading companies of today, like Muscletech or Gammo O. Lets see what these idiots have to say then. Hahahaha I'd love to see their faces then.

luv2build

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 339
  • Getbig!
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #34 on: August 21, 2006, 12:16:50 PM »
For F*ck sakes  >:( Are you now stupid enough to say that Jim Quinn, who's never been known to lie or even exaggerate, would lie about such a thing, especially on TV ? Not to mention that if you are right, it would mean a) Billy Smith is lying too and b) Flex Wheeler didn't achieve 0.00 % bodyfat levels either. Hahahahaha you are a retard.

And you know everything he says is truth???  He can get away with saying something like that on tv because most of america is very ignorant and doesnt know any better.  and yes i am saying flex didnt achieve 0.00 as well.  YOU my friend are the retard for believing things with absolutly no proof to back it up.

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #35 on: August 21, 2006, 12:20:33 PM »
And you know everything he says is truth???  He can get away with saying something like that on tv because most of america is very ignorant and doesnt know any better.  and yes i am saying flex didnt achieve 0.00 as well.  YOU my friend are the retard for believing things with absolutly no proof to back it up.

I do have proof. Heaps of people saw it when Jim Quinn announced it on ESPN, not to mention several people witnessed the actual act of Billy Smith measuring Batista's bodyfat levels. What more do you want you idiot ?

Joey Tito

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1006
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #36 on: August 21, 2006, 12:21:50 PM »
It's people like luv2build who actually prevent mankind from making progress. I firmly believe in the not-too-distant future, bodybuilders will actually compete at NEGATIVE bodyfat levels, due to scientific advancements by the leading companies of today, like Muscletech or Gammo O. Lets see what these idiots have to say then. Hahahaha I'd love to see their faces then.

luv2build

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 339
  • Getbig!
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #37 on: August 21, 2006, 12:21:55 PM »
I do have proof. Heaps of people saw it when Jim Quinn announced it on ESPN, not to mention several people witnessed the actual act of Billy Smith measuring Batista's bodyfat levels. What more do you want you idiot ?

Thats hearsay not proof.

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #38 on: August 21, 2006, 12:23:33 PM »
Thats hearsay not proof.

Fine be negative and disbelieving. I'd like to see the look on your face when someone steps onstage at negative 2 or 4% Bodyfat levels in about 4 years or so, maybe sooner. Let's see what you have to say then. You're pathetic.

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #39 on: August 21, 2006, 12:31:06 PM »
::)

Too bad your inside matches your outside hahahahahahaha

Ok, balding dwarf.
The House that Ruth built

Joey Tito

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1006
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #40 on: August 21, 2006, 12:32:44 PM »
Go ahead and BE negative. I'd like to see the look on your face when someone steps onstage at negative 2 or 4% Bodyfat levels in about 4 years or so, maybe sooner. Let's see what you have to say then. You're pathetic.  And you pack fudge with Vince "Sweet Hormo" Basile

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #41 on: August 21, 2006, 12:33:22 PM »
::)

Too bad your inside matches your outside hahahahahahaha

I may have 13.5" arms according to you but I can go outside without a bag over my head like you need.
The House that Ruth built

Joey Tito

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1006
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #42 on: August 21, 2006, 12:34:13 PM »
I may have 13.5" arms according to you but I can go outside without a bag over my head like you need.

Only one of my arms is 13.5 inches.  The other two are 18.

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #43 on: August 21, 2006, 12:34:35 PM »
Go ahead and BE negative. I'd like to see the look on your face when someone steps onstage at negative 2 or 4% Bodyfat levels in about 4 years or so, maybe sooner. Let's see what you have to say then. You're pathetic.  And you pack fudge with Vince "Sweet Hormo" Basile

How can you get a bodyfat reading below ZERO? Your kidding I hope?
The House that Ruth built

Joey Tito

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 1006
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #44 on: August 21, 2006, 12:37:32 PM »
How can you get a bodyfat reading below ZERO? Your kidding I hope?

No I am NOT at all kidding.  Look, fact of the matter is, Flex Wheeler registered a 0% body fat.  That means NO body fat.  To get a negative (=less than zero) reading, one simply has to have 100% more muscle than fat.  Very difficult to do, but not impossible theoretically.  By way of an analogy remember the Kaisenberg coefficient and plug that into the mass-ratio formula.  It's pretty simple from there.

Below Me

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 649
  • Getbig!
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #45 on: August 21, 2006, 12:38:18 PM »
All drugs ::)

 ;D

It's not how much you can lift,
It's how much it looks like you can lift.


Bob C., 2006

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #46 on: August 21, 2006, 12:44:05 PM »
I may have 13.5" arms according to you but I can go outside without a bag over my head like you need.

Hahahahaha try not to respond to the same post more than once - no need to make it too obvious that you're melting down. And FYI, Batista has measured at 0.00 % bodyfat level you retard.

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #47 on: August 21, 2006, 12:46:17 PM »
Hahahahaha try not to respond to the same post more than once - no need to make it too obvious that you're melting down. And FYI, Batista has measured at 0.00 % bodyfat level you retard.

I bet he's sub-zero now.

dorkeroo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1403
  • I need steroids for the brain.
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #48 on: August 21, 2006, 01:35:29 PM »
No I am NOT at all kidding.  Look, fact of the matter is, Flex Wheeler registered a 0% body fat.  That means NO body fat.  To get a negative (=less than zero) reading, one simply has to have 100% more muscle than fat.  Very difficult to do, but not impossible theoretically.  By way of an analogy remember the Kaisenberg coefficient and plug that into the mass-ratio formula.  It's pretty simple from there.

You and some of the others on here should write a dissertation or something and get these theories published. They could be worth MILLIONS!! You would totally pwn everyone on here!

Damn it is cool to be watching this all happen from the ground up, unlike so many other incredible scientific advances (Muscletech, Myostatin, Bob Chick etc.), which have almost completely taken form by the time we get to see them :D

dave7874

  • Getbig I
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Getbig!
Re: Batistas big 3 lifts
« Reply #49 on: August 21, 2006, 01:52:05 PM »
No I am NOT at all kidding.  Look, fact of the matter is, Flex Wheeler registered a 0% body fat.  That means NO body fat.  To get a negative (=less than zero) reading, one simply has to have 100% more muscle than fat.  Very difficult to do, but not impossible theoretically.  By way of an analogy remember the Kaisenberg coefficient and plug that into the mass-ratio formula.  It's pretty simple from there.

As convinced as you seem to be about this, you certainly have not convinced me. Surely body fat percentage is measured relative to total body mass. It is not relative simply to muscle mass. You seem to be forgetting that the body is composed of more than simply muscle and fat. And since all cell membranes in the body are composed of a lipid (fat) bi-layer then without an essential percentage of body fat (around 2-4%) there would be no cells and thus no body. It is physically and indeed physiologically impossible to get below 2-4%. Sorry to bust your theory but them is the facts.