Author Topic: Kamali 1999 and 2006 comparisons (Read 4536 times)

Finally King gets placed where he deserves as opposed to where name recognition got him. Top six at the NY Pro show? Give me a break! Meanwhile Frank McGrath placed 12th at a show of a similar caliber, the 2004 Toronto Pro. I think the judges may have read these boards and came to their senses.

The judges can read?

Hedgehog · « **Reply #13 on:** August 27, 2006, 01:00:39 PM »

Quote from: Stavios on August 27, 2006, 11:59:43 AM

just how the f**k did Kamali placed ahead of Chick at the 1999 nationals

Kamali must have been real good friends with them judges.

He never should've been a pro to begin with.

Time to stop believing the hype.

YIP
Zack

bigmikecox · « **Reply #14 on:** August 27, 2006, 01:14:15 PM »

GH in moderation can do wonders for the body.

His waist and head got huge!!!

sarcasm · « **Reply #15 on:** August 27, 2006, 01:15:52 PM »

Quote from: Bast175 on August 27, 2006, 11:46:29 AM

Nevertrustablonde brought up a good point that there aren't enough Kamali threads on getbig so I made another one.

are you suggesting that "nevertrustablonde" enjoys a good doggie style pounding from time to time, Bast?

Has Beens · « **Reply #16 on:** August 27, 2006, 01:20:03 PM »

I have to give credit to Chick in that shot.....very impressive !

Sculpter · « **Reply #17 on:** August 27, 2006, 01:44:11 PM »

Those '99 & '06 pics are eye opening.Looking at them you can see how his body has actually gotten worse throughout the years.His arm size is actually the only thing that hasn't changed for better or worse!

gibberj2 · « **Reply #18 on:** August 27, 2006, 02:14:18 PM »

In my opinion Bob has always had a better physique than Kamali.

Hedgehog · « **Reply #19 on:** August 27, 2006, 02:27:57 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on August 27, 2006, 01:55:26 PM

I think it may still be possible for King to improve. Bertil didn't look so great at the 1987 Mr. Olympia but improved for some of the 1989 shows. It is possible!

I agree. But he would need a big layoff, and perhaps aim for the spring shows in 2008.

Let his body heal up, let the gut and the obliques come down in size as much as possible. Then stay the fcuk away from the heavy stuff.

YIP
Zack

Farcry · « **Reply #20 on:** August 27, 2006, 02:31:39 PM »

King should take the rest of this year off and 2007, train naturally for a while, then comeback in 2008

WiseGuy · « **Reply #21 on:** August 27, 2006, 04:30:22 PM »

Quote from: Farcry on August 27, 2006, 02:31:39 PM

King should take the rest of this year off and 2007, train naturally for a while, then comeback in 2008

I agree he really needs to start over.....

WiseGuy · « **Reply #22 on:** August 27, 2006, 04:32:03 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on August 27, 2006, 01:55:26 PM

I think it may still be possible for King to improve. Bertil didn't look so great at the 1987 Mr. Olympia but improved for some of the 1989 shows. It is possible!

at this point king needs:

pobrecito · « **Reply #23 on:** August 27, 2006, 04:34:24 PM »

Well, this is nothing new. Damn near EVERY pro has regressed their physique since winning their pro card. See, back when they were amateurs they were the genetic elite and could play their own game and look their best. But now, they are no longer the genetic elite (i.e. Coleman) and are forced to play his game and ruin their look $:-\$

jmt1 · « **Reply #24 on:** August 27, 2006, 04:38:08 PM »

let me fix that pic of chic....

there much better.