You're a dumb one aren't you? You believe the alternative to whatever it is I am saying. If I am arguing against bigfoot with some undergraduate all of a sudden he's a "doctor" and a "real scientist". Haha!
When I’m arguing with some guy who claims he speaks Norwegian you believe him when he's only spoken 2 sentences opposed to my several (Perfectly put together) responses in flawless Norwegian.
You need to actually do your own research and stop relying on the word of others. Maybe if you did you would figure out I’m actually right.
If you took the time to research yourself or just read a little you'll find I agree with you about many things. Mostly from your Johnny Apollo days.
But when it comes to your crediblity you have none. One reason is (among many), you refused to address a person who provided verifiable credentials. This is something you have dodged from day one. As far out as BIGFOOT is, there is likely to be some scientific explanation to the numerous sightings and legends over the years or maybe not. But you never addressed his assertions with him.
So when you argue with a guy who speaks Norwegian and he says you are full of it I tend to believe him over you.
Until someone with verifiable credentials came around I would believe any of what you said about genetics and such. Your mastery of retrieving information on the web is superb. But he exposed you and you said nothing and ran.
Then you and your buddy Bast cooked up the whole "Johnny died routine" So that pretty much erased any real credibility you had left.
So now it should be appearent why i tend to side with anyone who refutes you at the moment.
Now that's leaves your approach to debating and use of logic in a debate which
you do very well and wuold be put to
excellent use in debating 240 and his theories. It's far more practical that TROLLING the religous boards as bjork and being plain stupid.
