Earl's annual NFL predictions

[RUDE BUOY]

wrong

i know you and those espn know it alls are all giddy about vick but you guys will end up disappointed again and again

E

in all honesty i have liked the falcons dating back to jamal anderson

[Earl1972]

in all honesty i have liked the falcons dating back to jamal anderson

wow that's a solid 7 years

hardcore fan

are you from atlanta?

E

[RUDE BUOY]

wow that's a solid 7 years

hardcore fan

are you from atlanta?

E

nope im from calgary and dude give me a break i have only really been watching for about 7 years

[Earl1972]

nope im from calgary and dude give me a break i have only really been watching for about 7 years

haha no wonder it's been so easy owning you

E

[RUDE BUOY]

haha no wonder it's been so easy owning you

E

hey count suckula you aint owned shit but a pair of shitty undearwear know your role bitch  and calgary's hockey team is better than yours

[Earl1972]

and calgary's hockey team is better than yours

for now

wouldn't you love to have crosby and malkin

E

[RUDE BUOY]

for now

wouldn't you love to have crosby and malkin

E

dude you guys got some good young players out there if they keep it up they will be a great team

[Oldschool Flip]

he was never considered to be the savior or anything

But he was "bought", which I guess you despise if someone is trying to win.

the rushing attack is far from the biggest problem take away two fumbled punts and they are 4-2 instead of 2-4

Though I agree that turnovers affect the outcome of the games, both times they had a chance to WIN it under their control, but didn't. To say that just the turnovers are the problem is still denying the fact that offensively, they are behind from last year.

the kansas city game was recent and he was also great last week, he struggled in the two games after the appendectomy

Okay so that still doesn't change the fact they lost 2 other games.

I've cheered them since birth

Well if I was psychic, then I would know how old you are.

bring on your question

E

To be fair to you, I can't ask you a question a bout the team before your birth.

[OzmO]

haha thanks for the life story it brought a tear to my eye

I doubt you can name any other time where a player was called for movement when they were hurrying up to spike the ball

if jackson didn't push off he wouldn't ahve caught the pass hence the pushoff

those calls can't be compared and I love how you ignore the facts that I pointed out before

you just dwell on one or two "bad calls"

E

that story is a point of reference for you to see where i'm coming from.  Might be too much for you. 

Look,  you are  2 and 4,  What other teams are 2 and 4?  If you lose to the Raiders this week you guys are done for.

I'll say again, but we won't get anywhere:  If they used that example as a model for pushing off, that penalty would be called dam near 50% of every passing play. 

But you are not going to yeld to my point and niether am I to yours regarding this.  Because for you to do that would be to turn from your beloved team who is 2 and 4 now.

[Earl1972]

But he was "bought", which I guess you despise if someone is trying to win.
Though I agree that turnovers affect the outcome of the games, both times they had a chance to WIN it under their control, but didn't. To say that just the turnovers are the problem is still denying the fact that offensively, they are behind from last year.
Okay so that still doesn't change the fact they lost 2 other games.
Well if I was psychic, then I would know how old you are.
To be fair to you, I can't ask you a question a bout the team before your birth.

he wasn't paid jack shit by us so no he wasn't bought

if you take away two silly fumbled punts they would've won

yes they are behind offensively due to ben's off field problems

what did you think the "1972" stood for?

E

[Earl1972]

that story is a point of reference for you to see where i'm coming from.  Might be too much for you. 

Look,  you are  2 and 4,  What other teams are 2 and 4?  If you lose to the Raiders this week you guys are done for.

I'll say again, but we won't get anywhere:  If they used that example as a model for pushing off, that penalty would be called dam near 50% of every passing play. 

But you are not going to yeld to my point and niether am I to yours regarding this.  Because for you to do that would be to turn from your beloved team who is 2 and 4 now.

yes I will probably concede if they lose to oakland

it was a pushoff, basically you're saying it should never be called at all

and keep ignoring the facts I pointed out how seattle blew it and focus on the one or two "bad calls", it really helps your argument

whether this season is over or not, our future still is very bright and we will be back no doubt about it

E

[OzmO]

yes I will probably concede if they lose to oakland

it was a pushoff, basically you're saying it should never be called at all

and keep ignoring the facts I pointed out how seattle blew it and focus on the one or two "bad calls", it really helps your argument

whether this season is over or not, our future still is very bright and we will be back no doubt about it

E

No,  i'm saying that at all about the "alleged" push off.

And yes, they to a certain degree they blew it.  From Seattles point of view i would take 100% responsibility for the loss.  But I'm not Seattle.

And yes, the Steelers have a bright future either way.  They need a power runner though, Parker, who i have on my fantasy team, isn't the guy  to give them that.

[Earl1972]

it was supposed to be duce but he likes being paid to stand on the sideline and be fat

davenport is decent but he is injury prone

what they really need is a guy that can hold on to the ball while returning punts

E

[RUDE BUOY]

earl you fuggen cvnt cammel you, who do you think is winning today the bengals or the falcons

[pumpster]

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/29/sports/playmagazine/1029play_parcells.html?pagewanted=1&ref=sports

[Earl1972]

earl you fuggen cvnt cammel you, who do you think is winning today the bengals or the falcons

hopefully the falcons since bengals are in our division

E

[brianX]

Oh brother, and to think that everyone was hyping up the Iggles just a few weeks ago. McNabb is the most overrated quarterback in history. They'll be lucky to break .500 this year.

[Oldschool Flip]

if you take away two silly fumbled punts they would've won

If the other teams played better it would have been a blow out. Quit with the "ifs" and deal with reality.

yes they are behind offensively due to ben's off field problems

Wait till Oakland beats them, I want to hear what you say then.

what did you think the "1972" stood for?

That you started watching them in 1972 or that you were born in 1972? Lol, can't see how you could understand the game at 2 years old when they were in an SB.

[blinky]

so earl...............


loss to the raiders who managed only 98 yeards on offence.

steelers are officialy a bad team this year 

 

[blinky]

Wait till Oakland beats them, I want to hear what you say then.

good call 

[body88]

I picked the steelers to win there devision     Big game for us tomorrow night in Minnesota!

[Oldschool Flip]

Just like I predicted. Another Steelers loss and to one of the worst teams in the NFL. The Raiders are rated at 26th against the rush and the Steelers could not take advantage. No rushing problems Earl? Couldn't punch it in from the 3, then 2, then 1 yard line? No Bettis=no short yardage TD's like I said. Lol, and now that Ben has officially, been okay according to you since the Kansas City game, what excuse will you come up with now. As of this point the Steelers are one of the WORST Superbowl champions trying to retain their title.

exactly one year ago today I predicted the Steelers would win the Super Bowl and get that one for the thumb right after they pulverized the Titans

We all know how that turned out

well they just beat up on the dolphins without Big Ben, the team every so called expert picks to go all the way

Guess the experts are right so far.

I predict the Steelers To get their 6th ring this year

Time to eat crow.

The new slogan replacing "one for the thumb"  is:

DON'T STOP THERE, THE OTHER HAND IS BARE

GO STEELERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

E

At this point they are better jacking off with the other hand and try to mend what problems they have this year. Like I PREDICTED earlier in the year: They would not be any better than 9-7......guess I am right.

Except for Oakland and Tampa Bay, their schedule looks pretty rough. If they go 9-7 I will be surprised.

Lol, I said Oakland would be easy, guess again. My bad.

[G o a t b o y]

yes flower's worthless life is very important

bodybuilding is a sport and you care enough about it to watch live webcasts of shows on saturday nights

and get the hell out of my thread you never say anything remotely funny or valid so take your nonsense back to "teh x" where they appreciate it

E

Bodybuilding is not a sport.


Neither is being Levrone's little fanboy.


Hope this helps.

[OzmO]

Just like I predicted. Another Steelers loss and to one of the worst teams in the NFL. The Raiders are rated at 26th against the rush and the Steelers could not take advantage. No rushing problems Earl? Couldn't punch it in from the 3, then 2, then 1 yard line? No Bettis=no short yardage TD's like I said. Lol, and now that Ben has officially, been okay according to you since the Kansas City game, what excuse will you come up with now. As of this point the Steelers are one of the WORST Superbowl champions trying to retain their title.

Guess the experts are right so far.
Time to eat crow.
At this point they are better jacking off with the other hand and try to mend what problems they have this year. Like I PREDICTED earlier in the year: They would not be any better than 9-7......guess I am right.

OUCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


So any more predictions Earl?   

[RUDE BUOY]

vick is here ladies bow down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! from this day foward big bens name has been changed to sally