Author Topic: A critique of the 911 "loose change" documentary...  (Read 1388 times)

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5811
A critique of the 911 "loose change" documentary...
« on: September 10, 2006, 03:50:19 PM »
I'm not on either side of the 911 debate but i'm a champion for alternative points of view...

http://internetdetectives.biz/case/loose-change

Also, i'm not about to get into a flaming war with 240 on this topic either... :)


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: A critique of the 911 "loose change" documentary...
« Reply #1 on: September 10, 2006, 04:09:46 PM »
LOL... I just have one question... Who the heck told the fighter jets to fly at only 500 mph and take the long way to get to DC? 

They could have went 1875 mph and gone in a straight line.  Instead they did laps on a holding pattern then cruised in after everything was down.

The widows BEGGED for info WHY.  They never got them.  I would like to know the name of the guy who told them to stroll in slowly, and why.


Also, if you want accurate info, measurements, and all the good stuff that cannot be argued, please check out In Plane Site -

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1350815371737518499&q=911+power+hour&hl=en

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5811
Re: A critique of the 911 "loose change" documentary...
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2006, 04:23:59 PM »
LOL... I just have one question... Who the heck told the fighter jets to fly at only 500 mph and take the long way to get to DC? 

They could have went 1875 mph and gone in a straight line.  Instead they did laps on a holding pattern then cruised in after everything was down.

The widows BEGGED for info WHY.  They never got them.  I would like to know the name of the guy who told them to stroll in slowly, and why.


Also, if you want accurate info, measurements, and all the good stuff that cannot be argued, please check out In Plane Site -

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1350815371737518499&q=911+power+hour&hl=en
he he i don't have any answers brother i'm just surfing the net for different points of view about the topic...

whenever ANYBODY makes a documentary they have the ability to misquote, take out of context or otherwise bend information to fit their point of view... these guys are no different...


jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5811
Re: A critique of the 911 "loose change" documentary...
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2006, 06:35:41 PM »
Interesting quote from a guy who was there that day... from a blog

my name is nick morano. i worked at 90 west street, i had to walk away from the WTC to actually see the hole i was so close. the second plane flew right over my head. there was no missile, it was a commercial airliner, i have 20/10 vision. after running to battery park, i looked back and said to myself, "those buildings are coming down". i hitched a ride from the tunnel where the FDR starts, there was about 20 of us. I got in a sentra driven by a hacidic guy and in the back was myself and 2 young kids from kansas who just started working at Weatherly Securities in the tower. I said to them, "they're coming down, both of them". one of them said "nah, theyre firewalled (or whatever)". i was like "no way man, those holes are gigantic, the fire is raging theres no way they can sustain that. theyre only getting worse". you can't begin to imagine how big those holes were unless you saw them up close with your own eyes. it's nothing like what i've seen on TV. the guy dropped us off by the UN and i walked to my apt. on 38th, and my roommate, who worked at the AMEX, looked at me and said can you believe this sh*t? I said those things are coming down. He said "oh 100%". The south tower fell 5 minutes later.
Now how did I know that Bush planted explosives in the WTC? Come on, this is the most idiotic theory Ive ever heard in my entire life. people who believe this nonsense for one minute should get serious help.
Why fly planes into a building THEN detonate explosives? Why not just detonate both buildings at the same time? It would have killed 50x more people.
These people at loose change claim that since steel melts at 3000 degrees and jet fuel only heats to 1700 degrees, it would be impossible. some idiotic statement not taking into account pressure, atmosphere, time, wind, and 100 other factors. loose change also fails to mention when STEEL BECOMES MALLABLE, ie. bendable. depending on how much carbon, iron the allow has it can melt at as low as 1000 degrees and become malleable at just 400 degrees. Now, does this mean that steel will buckle at 400 degrees if i put a elephant on it? No, but if you put 60 city-block size floors on it, the equivalent of 200 million elephants, yeah it's going to buckle, especially after burning at 1500 degrees for 40 minutes.
this video by loose change is about 1 thing. making money. just go to the website, they have more advertisers than a Nascar driver.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: A critique of the 911 "loose change" documentary...
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2006, 06:44:59 PM »
I'd love to hear nick morano's take on why WTC collapsed in such a manner. 

i'd love to hear it from anyone.  FEMA doesn't know.  911 Commission Report completely didn't mention it.  imagine that!  NIST keeps changing their story, every time the Scholars for 911 truth dispel the existing theory.  They continually review it, and it is continually proven wrong.  Why is this?

Why did WTC7 fall?  Why did it go from 500 feet of concrete and steel, to 30 feet of shit, in less than 7 seconds.  THis does not happen in reality from small fires.