Yes Jaggy, inquiring minds want to know. Who looks better than Coleman. Haney, Dorian at their peaks and Ronnie at his nadir. Maybe...who else? Phil "the thrill" Heath...don't think so. Vic "the slick" Martinez..not in this lifetime. Jay "I'm so ... " Cutler...not even close. Dex "I can't Flex" Jackson...one of Ronnie's thighs is bigger...lol. I don't see it Jaggy.
Agreed! Last year, Jay has finally catched up to Ronald when it comes wo lat width. But Ronnie's lats, teres major and infra-spinatus are still thicker than Jay's, besides that Ronnie's back separations are on a whole other league. Ronnie's midsection is also superior, with a better taper and more abdominal separations. Coleman's quads are also on a whole other level in size, separations, density, etc. Jay has no chance. When you talk about Coleman, there are only three or four bodybuilders in history who would have a legitimate shot at defeating him, and even then, only if they came in their absolute best shape ever. Of the current pros, none has any shot at defeating Ron. None.
Jay is on another league altogether from his competitors. But Coleman is on a league even above that!

Having said all this, though, Ronnie is now a 42 year-old middle-aged man, and while this gives him an advantage in density and muscle maturity, it gives him a liability in muscle fullness - his muscles are looking flatter every year. I think it would be wise of him to retire this year; next year, at age 43, maybe his muscles will have deteriorated a little too much for him to look like a standard-bearer. Regardless, Jay has no chance...
SUCKMYMUSCLE