Canada Free Press: Nuke attack in US?

[240 is Back]

Clinton was quite the little snake.  bush had warning from 11 nations and let 911 happen.  Sure.  Inexcusable.

Clinton's FBI gave the terrorists the bombs for the 93 WTC attacks.... Clinton's prosecutor's didn't mention those 3 huge bombs removed from the OK City federal building.

So both men employed false flag attacks.  And listen, anyone who wants to shit on my "crazy talk", look at the evidence.  TELL ME why they left those 3 bombs out of the trial at OK City.  TELL ME why the FBI head was on tape giving directions about the 1993 WTC attack.

I'm tired of getting labeled, when people won't face the evidence in front of them.  I can show you the FEMA and ATF documents of the bombs removed by the bomb squad from OK City.  yes they dissappeared at trial.  I'd love for one of our patriots here to tell me how this works

[Eyeball Chambers]

LOL I am young but I was alive the whole time Clinton was in office,  what other time were we bombed on our soil?

Please, we were bombed on our own soil a second time while Clinton was in office?  This is news to me.

These attacks don't happen everyday.  Were not safer now,  just more paranoid.

P.S. Im not defending Clinton at all, just that 8 years past between attacks.

[240 is Back]

LOL...

What part frustrates you?

Tell me this - and I've asked you before - do you believe this is the same Osama?

[Hedgehog]

No, not insecure. I just have a degree in Journalism from a reputable school. There I was taught to read and analyse the news properly, and as well, I learned the "tricks."  So today I read many blogs, etc., and formulate my own opinions. It has nothing to do with my politics.

What's your opinion on Sawatsky?

YIP
Zack

[Mr. Intenseone]

LOL I am young but I was alive the whole time Clinton was in office,  what other time were we bombed on our soil?

http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york-issue112901.shtml

WTC, USS Cole and the US Embassies are considered our soil!

[Eyeball Chambers]

http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york-issue112901.shtml

WTC, USS Cole and the US Embassies are considered our soil!

Attacks that didn't happen in the United States but on our soil in other countries around the world are happening under Bush as we speak,  so whats your point?

Come on Intenseone,  ENTER THE NO SPIN ZONE! 

[Hugo Chavez]

Yes, but this is just right-wing fear mongering to terrify people back into supporting an unpopular war. The only blogs/new orgs who picked up that story are clearly ultra conservative.

http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2006/09/14/paul-williams-continued-malarky/

I believe there is fear mongering going on, but this image is depicted in the mural's at DIA which are a sort of timeline depiction of the zionist end times and masonic game plan for humanity.  So I believe there is a good chance this will happen.  I thought it would be later for this but 

[Eyeball Chambers]

mural's at DIA

Whats DIA?

[Al-Gebra]

Just to add a little levity... The CFP is an ultra right-wing, conservative, "alternative" paper, and the content is often racist, as well as inaccurate.  They are constantly be sued, having to retract, etc... also, they often use journalism student interns to write their content.

hahaha . . . 240 can't stay away from websites run by guys w tattoos of swastikas on their necks.

[240 is Back]

hahaha . . . 240 can't stay away from websites run by guys w tattoos of swastikas on their necks.

what a racist, bullshit charge to levy.  grow up algebra.  the story is making the rounds, and i put the disclaimer up top.  grow the fuck up, and deliver an argument.

[Hedgehog]

what a racist, bullshit charge to levy.  grow up algebra.  the story is making the rounds, and i put the disclaimer up top.  grow the f**k up, and deliver an argument.

This is what your disclaimer looked like:

This is just an article from a Canadian publication.  I'm sure it's wrong, and all that.  But in the non-mainstream media, it's been coming out over the last few days.  Could be nothing, could just be a scare tactic.  But it'd be irresponsible not to pass it on

I think it was irresponsible to not mention that the source of the information was heavily biased.

YIP
Zack

[Soul Crusher]

No, I'm saying that right wing bloggers and news orgs are trying to garner new support for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. What's the best way to rouse a disillusioned people... raise the terrorist alert once again. Sometimes you just have to look through the propaganda sh*t and pick your CTs with discernment.

You are so uninformed.  The terrorists plot and plot for years for big attacks. 

[Soul Crusher]

Yep... purty much.  Just look at the sources. Of those who have reported this, all but one are discredited news orgs. I use the term "news" loosely.

And Democratic Underground and the NYT are bastions of credibility.  Right.

[Soul Crusher]

No, not insecure. I just have a degree in Journalism from a reputable school. There I was taught to read and analyse the news properly, and as well, I learned the "tricks."  So today I read many blogs, etc., and formulate my own opinions. It has nothing to do with my politics.

And 100% of Journalism profs are liberally biased themselves.  You accuse others of that which you are yourself but won't admit.

[Soul Crusher]

LOL I am young but I was alive the whole time Clinton was in office,  what other time were we bombed on our soil?

1993 WTC
Foreign Embassies in Africa
Marine Barracks
USS Cole

Read the 9'11 report.  OBL said since we acted like little pussies all through the 90's that he thought we would never fight back. 

[Hedgehog]

And 100% of Journalism profs are liberally biased themselves.  You accuse others of that which you are yourself but won't admit.

Depends on what you mean by liberal.

Liberal as the political ideology of Republicans, Democrats or Libertarians - sure.

All Journalism profs are probably a supporter of one of the above, and all of those parties bases its politics on liberalism in some form.

For whatever reason, the word "liberal" has been used to label people to the left on the political scale.

Which is, of course, incorrect.

YIP
Zack

[Soul Crusher]

Depends on what you mean by liberal.

Liberal as the political ideology of Republicans, Democrats or Libertarians - sure.

All Journalism profs are probably a supporter of one of the above, and all of those parties bases its politics on liberalism in some form.

For whatever reason, the word "liberal" has been used to label people to the left on the political scale.

Which is, of course, incorrect.

YIP
Zack

I prefer socialist and communist as a label for them myself.

[Eyeball Chambers]

1993 WTC
Foreign Embassies in Africa
Marine Barracks
USS Cole

Read the 9'11 report.  OBL said since we acted like little pussies all through the 90's that he thought we would never fight back. 

You missed my whole point. Intenseone said there hasn't been an attack since 9/11, I said there were 8 years between the last attack on our homeland,  he said there were attacks on our soil over seas under Clinton (which had nothing to do with my argument about there not being an attack over here for 8 years.), were being attacked on our own soil abroad all the time under Bush. 

So what makes you people think were safer?

[Soul Crusher]

You missed my whole point. Intenseone said there hasn't been an attack since 9/11, I said there were 8 years between the last attack on our homeland,  he said there were attacks on our soil over seas under Clinton (which had nothing to do with my argument about there not being an attack over here for 8 years.), were being attacked on our own soil abroad all the time under Bush. 

So what makes you people think were safer?

Fool, we have been being attacked since Carter (Hostages), Reagan (Beirut), Bush (Lockerbie Scotland), Clinton,

It goes on and on.  We are facing a determined fanatical cult following enemy.

[Deedee]

And 100% of Journalism profs are liberally biased themselves.  You accuse others of that which you are yourself but won't admit.

Sorry guy, but I don't get what this means.  Are you saying I'm accusing others of being liberals?

As far as your other responses to my posts go, I just don't see how you can tell whether I'm a conservative or liberal leaning. I also find it condescending, since you don't know me, to say that I'm uninformed.  What I said was that the sources reporting on this are heavily editorialized and biased toward the right.  Paul Williams has been going on about the imminent attack for two years now, so I doubt if he and the rest of the world understand the same meaning for the word imminent. I do understand that terrorist cells have the patience of the east and plan their attacks many years in advance.  I just don't believe 6 hack right wing news sources, one of which employs students, would have the inside breaking news on this.

[Eyeball Chambers]

Fool, we have been being attacked since Carter (Hostages), Reagan (Beirut), Bush (Lockerbie Scotland), Clinton,

It goes on and on.  We are facing a determined fanatical cult following enemy.

<unt try and stick with me here OK?  Were being attacked more now than ever... OK?  So whats your proof were safer under Bush....  U  n  d  e  r  s t a n d ?

[Hugo Chavez]

Whats DIA?

Dever International Airport... it's full of really strange occult stuff much of it in line with the vision of the coming of the old testement messiah and what is to be the messonic messiah.  He's Scottish from the famous McGregor Clan or at least he bears the same family motto.   

Burning City... I think this will happen, just don't know when...

[Eyeball Chambers]

WOW What the FOCK?

[Hugo Chavez]

WOW What the FOCK?

Did you see the dead babies

[Eyeball Chambers]

JUST DID.. NOW I AM THOROUGHLY FREAKED OUT. 

 

Can you post a hot ass picture to turn my frown around?