It is lolo... however it would have to be the case... based on your definition which I quoted for you.
No it wouldn't. I just explained it to you. That's your interpretation of my comments, which I disagreed with. Taking the pill is not abortion. Neither is abstinence.
And I never said I was "against abortion." I've never expressed an opinion about that one way or the other. You simply made an assumption. It's a very complicated issue. I see some black and white (e.g., whether an unborn child is actually a baby--yes), but lots of gray (e.g., balancing the protection of the baby with the woman's bodily integrity issue).