![](http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=96380.0;attach=104745;image)
again, the problem I have beliving he was 8 inches shorter than claimed has nothing to do with "hyping" his legacy up or hyping up the WWE.
It has to do with the hundreds of pictures of him standing next to people and being significantly taller than them...
take this pic for example, if Andre was 6'10, that means the lady is probaby
under 5 feet in height which, for an adult woman, is not that common.
It is much more believable that he was more like 7'4 and she was of a more normal height.
the same exact analogy can be used with wrestlers and commentators too:
![](http://square.phpwebhosting.com/~man1000/assets/photo3/full/11112%20copy.jpg)
if Andre was 8 inches shorter than billed at, that means that
everyone else is also 8 inches shorter to keep the relative proportions correct in all the pics and videos.
This is the part I find hard to believe.
anyone else agree?