Author Topic: Rolling Stone tackles the 2004 election  (Read 1461 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Rolling Stone tackles the 2004 election
« on: September 24, 2006, 01:59:34 PM »
www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen

Before anyone flippantly says "monster liberal source", note that the Rolling Stone piece here was written to dispel the stories written by the more liberal sources NYT and Wash Post, which blacked out the story.

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Re: Rolling Stone tackles the 2004 election
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2006, 02:46:48 PM »
It's already known that the Republican party likes to stay in power by cheating and scaring the American people.

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31866
Re: Rolling Stone tackles the 2004 election
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2006, 03:36:13 PM »
It's an absolute fact that the only place Bush should be sitting is in a jail cell. 

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Rolling Stone tackles the 2004 election
« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2006, 03:40:23 PM »
240, You post that as if it's news to people. The fraud of both elections may be news to the American people, ...but for everyone else outside of the USA, this is old news. How they're able to consistently pull it off right in front of your faces is what's so amazing. Bush must be happy Americans are too scared to behave like Hungarians.
w

Cavalier22

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3309
  • Citizens! The Fatherland is in Danger
Re: Rolling Stone tackles the 2004 election
« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2006, 04:31:57 PM »
both sides try to steal as many votes as possible.  so if one is better than the other than so be it.
Valhalla awaits.

Hedgehog

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19466
  • It Rubs The Lotion On Its Skin.
Re: Rolling Stone tackles the 2004 election
« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2006, 05:25:24 PM »
www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen

Before anyone flippantly says "monster liberal source", note that the Rolling Stone piece here was written to dispel the stories written by the more liberal sources NYT and Wash Post, which blacked out the story.


Rolling Stone is a solid magazine.

They try to do journalism.

You're too caught up in this "balancing" thing.

Here's my take on it: There's absolutely no need to balance the journalism, ie you don't have to bash republicans for ten minutes if you previously had been bashing democrats for ten minutes.

A journalist should try to find out the truth, and then tell it to the rest of the world. It's not the mission of the journalist to make sure that there is equal bashing. But it is in the mission of the journalist to make sure that all parts are getting their voice heard. Big difference.

The important thing is that the journalists try to stay objective, and also stay true to the mission of keeping those with power honest.

Rolling Stone is repeatedly publishing quality articles.

They're not "left" or "right". Their editorial may be, but the content is just journalism.

Big difference between editorials and the published material.

YIP
Zack
As empty as paradise