No, not a racist white man, but rather, an academically honest white person with an interest in collating and archiving historically correct accounts
A white person that stands in stark contrast to you and your ilk of academically clueless, dishonest, racially motivated idiots who would far sooner prescribe lies as truth via jewish media outlets
Again, cheers for the vindication, black man, its been fun
Sieg heil
So what would you call Piltdown man....
For those who may not know here is the short version.
Digs predating the infamous one of 1912 suggested that man's earliest remains were in africa..
1912 ENGLISH "scientest" Charles Dawson finds remains that predate the africa digs. The find was in Sussex England.
So it is now excepted that the earliest remains of human were found in England so the first man must be white.
Wrong..Dawson created the skill by combining various animals' teeth with a human skull. It wasnt until 1953 this myth was Debunked..
And the Lucy dig whose site is in modern day ethiopia uncovers remains of a human that is now accepted as the earliest humans' remains.
I say that to say this. "research" was done to glorify a certian race and was for damn near 40 years accepted. So dont say that there wasnt a motive behind the "research" that says blacks didnt invent anything.
