Author Topic: Did I miss something? Ronnie Rockel... (Read 5055 times)

donrhummy · « **on:** October 02, 2006, 05:34:50 AM »

How was Rockel not even in the top 15?!

rocket · « **Reply #1 on:** October 02, 2006, 05:36:05 AM »

Because the top 15 was full of really good physiques.

True story.

donrhummy · « **Reply #2 on:** October 02, 2006, 05:38:56 AM »

Quote from: rocket on October 02, 2006, 05:36:05 AM

Because the top 15 was full of really good physiques.

True story.

Really? You think this is a better physique?

rocket · « **Reply #3 on:** October 02, 2006, 05:40:07 AM »

Sorry I should have said really good physiques and "automatic placements for those who've paid their dues"

Samourai Pizzacat · « **Reply #4 on:** October 02, 2006, 05:41:03 AM »

RR has a great physique, hope he gets his dues soon...

Dorian 01 · « **Reply #5 on:** October 02, 2006, 05:41:08 AM »

He was the only physique that impressed me. Maybe it was the lighting, but seeing most of those guys at Flexonline really made me question why I even follow bodybuilding, and then there were the few like Ronnie Rockel.

He's at least better than Darrem Charles who is totally unbalanced.

Dorian 01 · « **Reply #6 on:** October 02, 2006, 05:42:49 AM »

Quote from: rocket on October 02, 2006, 05:40:07 AM

Sorry I should have said really good physiques and "automatic placements for those who've paid their dues"

Another similarity to pro wrestling. They don't give their phony titles to new guys either.

DSM18 · « **Reply #7 on:** October 02, 2006, 05:47:26 AM »

Quote from: Dorian 01 on October 02, 2006, 05:41:08 AM

He was the only physique that impressed me. Maybe it was the lighting, but seeing most of those guys at Flexonline really made me question why I even follow bodybuilding, and then there were the few like Ronnie Rockel.

He's at least better than Darrem Charles who is totally unbalanced.

agree 100 %

Vince B · « **Reply #8 on:** October 02, 2006, 06:04:01 AM »

Rockel and Martinez had two of the best overall physiques there. Period. Top 6 for sure.

texasRUSH · « **Reply #9 on:** October 02, 2006, 06:07:28 AM »

ronnie has a physique that most can aspire to if they have the right kindas budget

i wish he and a few others placed higher..but hte olympia is a freak show *shrug* guys like him can only hope to make a living at the smaller shows.

Petrucci · « **Reply #10 on:** October 02, 2006, 06:19:29 AM »

Quote from: Vince Basile on October 02, 2006, 06:04:01 AM

Rockel and Martinez had two of the best overall physiques there. Period. Top 6 for sure.

I agree on Martinez, a really good surprise...Toney Freeman and Melvin where had also very good presentations of their physiques.
But i was dissapointed with a lot of guys coming off this year...Gunter, Mustafa, Johnnie and Branch (well, the last two may have suffer a little with the shows too much close of the O, specially Johnnie)

But i always imagine the damage Lee could have done to this line up!!! i would put him at least at 4th behind Martinez!!!

RJB · « **Reply #11 on:** October 02, 2006, 06:28:40 AM »

You're right, man. Rockel looked pretty solid. All politics. All politics.

Victor VonDoom · « **Reply #12 on:** October 02, 2006, 07:17:16 AM »

Quote from: donrhummy on October 02, 2006, 05:34:50 AM

How was Rockel not even in the top 15?!

Olympia is a size game. RR doesn't have the size.

swilkins1984 · « **Reply #13 on:** October 02, 2006, 07:25:05 AM »

2005 & 2006....Ronnie Rockel was screwed. And this time the blue blazers can't blame it on the Dream Tan.

alexxx · « **Reply #14 on:** October 02, 2006, 07:28:35 AM »

How the heck did Rodney st-cloud make the top 10 and Ronnie Rockel place so low??? It seems like GAY for PAY is much more respected. $:-\$

ali23 · « **Reply #15 on:** October 02, 2006, 07:32:02 AM »

Quote from: alexxx on October 02, 2006, 07:28:35 AM

How the heck did Rodney st-cloud make the top 10 and Ronnie Rockel place so low??? It seems like GAY for PAY is much more respected. $:-\$

rodney st cloud didnt make the top 10 numbnuts... and he entertains women, not gay guys like you.

alexxx · « **Reply #16 on:** October 02, 2006, 07:34:41 AM »

Quote from: ali23 on October 02, 2006, 07:32:02 AM

rodney st cloud didnt make the top 10 numbnuts... and he entertains women, not gay guys like you.

Somebody's men passion proceeds him!

Mars · « **Reply #17 on:** October 02, 2006, 07:40:01 AM »

How can Dennis looks so awesome x weeks out and so horrible at contest?

The_Hammer · « **Reply #18 on:** October 02, 2006, 07:52:08 AM »

How did Rockel's back look?

Dorian 01 · « **Reply #19 on:** October 02, 2006, 08:21:09 AM »

Quote from: The_Hammer on October 02, 2006, 07:52:08 AM

How did Rockel's back look?

rocket · « **Reply #20 on:** October 02, 2006, 08:44:13 AM »

Not bad, not the best lat spread though

getfast81 · « **Reply #21 on:** October 02, 2006, 08:45:26 AM »

Amazing because some of the idiots on this board actually think he could have been top 5. Stupids.

He was conditioned but smooth he was somewhere in between 13 to last maybe. He placed where he should have. Great upside though.

SquatAss · « **Reply #22 on:** October 02, 2006, 10:11:09 AM »

Quote from: getfast81 on October 02, 2006, 08:45:26 AM

Amazing because some of the idiots on this board actually think he could have been top 5. Stupids.
He was conditioned but smooth he was somewhere in between 13 to last maybe. He placed where he should have. Great upside though.

Bullshit! The man got overlooked pure and simple. Cutler now he was smooth.

youngguns · « **Reply #23 on:** October 02, 2006, 10:18:16 AM »

Ronnie has paid his dues. He has continually been overlooked over the last couple of years. How well should he have placed, you got me? the man deserves a fair shake.

arce377 · « **Reply #24 on:** October 02, 2006, 10:43:33 AM »

Rockels a great bb