If you believe the fairy tales of the New Testament then you will see in John 20:6-7, the cloth wrapped around Christ's head is clearly separate from the strips wound around his body, so any cloth showing both head and body (as the Turin shroud does) can't be the real thing. But as many have said, if it does indeed originate from the time of the alleged Jesus of Nazareth it could be one of thousands; however that doesn't stop religious nutcases from wish thinking.
Ah, I'm glad that you brought that up, Trapezkerl! This brings us to another very intersting artifact,
The Sudarium of Oviedo - The Face Cloth.
John 20:6-7"Then Simon Peter came, following him, and went into the tomb; and he saw the linen cloths lying there, and
the handkerchief that had been around His head, not lying with the linen cloths, but folded together in a place by itself."
In the city of Oviedo, in northern Spain, in a small chapel attached to the city’s cathedral, there is a small bloodstained dishcloth size piece of linen that some believe is one of the burial cloths mentioned in John’s Gospel. Tradition has it that this cloth, commonly known as the Sudarium of Oviedo, was used to cover Jesus’ bloodied face following his death on the cross.
Forensic analysis of the bloodstains suggests strongly that both the Sudarium and the Shroud covered the same human head at closely different times. Bloodstain patterns show that the Sudarium was placed about a man’s head while he was still in a vertical position, presumably before he was removed from the cross.
It was then removed before the Shroud was placed over the man’s face. If the Sudarium is related to the Shroud, the historical implications are dramatic. The Sudarium, unquestionably, has been in Oviedo since the 8th century and in Spain since the 7th century. It seems, according to various records, to have arrived from Jerusalem.
http://www.skepticalspectacle.com/history04.htmThere is no image on this cloth. Only stains are visible to the naked eye, although more is visible under the microscope. The remarkable thing about this cloth is that
both tradition and scientific studies claim that the cloth was used to cover and clean the face of Jesus after the crucifixion. We are going to present and look into these claims.
http://www.shroud.com/guscin.htmSudarium of Oviedo (right), overlay of the Shroud of Turin (left) by Blandina Paschalis Schlömer
In 1999, Mark Guscin, a member of the multidisciplinary Investigation Team of the Centro Español de Sindonología, issued a detailed forensic and historical report entitled, "Recent Historical Investigations on the Sudarium of Oviedo." Guscin's report detailed recent findings of the history, forensic pathology, blood chemistry, and stain patterns on the Sudarium.
His conclusion: the Sudarium and the Shroud of Turin had been used to cover the same injured head at closely different times. Here are some highlights from Guscin's report:
It seems to be a funeral cloth that was probably placed over the head of the corpse of an adult male of normal constitution. The man whose face the Sudarium covered had a beard, moustache and long hair, tied up at the nape of his neck into a ponytail.
The man was dead. The mechanism that formed the stains is incompatible with any kind of breathing movement.
The man was wounded before death with something that made his scalp bleed and produced wounds on his neck, shoulders and upper part of the back.
The man suffered a pulmonary edema as a consequence of the terminal process.
The main stains are one part blood and six parts fluid from the pulmonary fluid.
The only position compatible with the formation of the stains on the Oviedo cloth is both arms outstretched above the head and the feet in such a position as to make breathing very difficult, i.e. a position totally compatible with crucifixion. We can say that the man was wounded first (blood on the head, shoulders and back) and then 'crucified.'
On reaching the destination, the body was placed face up and for unknown reasons, the cloth was taken off the head.
The Sudarium contains pollen grains of Gundelia tournefortii, identical to that found of the Shroud that grows only east of the Mediterranean Sea as far north as Lebanon and as far south as Jerusalem.
The blood (stain symmetry, type and other indicators) on the Sudarium matches the blood on the Shroud.
In summary, Guscin wrote:
There are many points of coincidence between all these points and the Shroud of Turin - the blood group, the way the corpse was tortured and died, and the macroscopic overlay of the stains on each cloth. This is especially notable in that the blood on the Sudarium, shed in life as opposed to postmortem, corresponds exactly in blood group, blood type and surface area to those stains on the Shroud on the nape of the neck. If it is clear that the two cloths must have covered the same corpse, and this conclusion is inevitable from all the studies carried out up to date, and if the history of the Sudarium can be trustworthily extended back beyond the fourteenth century, which is often referred to as the Shroud's first documented historical appearance, then this would take the Shroud back to at least the earliest dates of the Sudarium's known history. The ark of relics and the Sudarium have without any doubt at all been in Spain since the beginning of the seventh century, and the history recorded in various manuscripts from various times and geographical areas take it all the way back to Jerusalem in the first century. The importance of this for Shroud history cannot be overstressed.
http://www.shroudstory.com/faq-sudarium.htm
