Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Eyeball Chambers on March 30, 2007, 10:43:50 AM
-
Bonaduce Says O'Donnell Should Be Hung On MSNBC
You Tube | March 30, 2007
Joe Scarborough Attacks Rosie O'Donnell, Barbara Walters & ABC For debating a serious issue. Scarborough brings in the political expert Danny Bonaduce, who says that O'Donnell should be 'strung up for treason' and 'aiding and abetting the enemy'. He then goes on to seriously defend that point.
-
Bonaduce Says O'Donnell Should Be Hung On MSNBC
You Tube | March 30, 2007
Joe Scarborough Attacks Rosie O'Donnell, Barbara Walters & ABC For debating a serious issue. Scarborough brings in the political expert Danny Bonaduce, who says that O'Donnell should be 'strung up for treason' and 'aiding and abetting the enemy'. He then goes on to seriously defend that point.
Please don't give Bonaduce any more attention. That dude is whacked and will say anything controversial wether he believes it or not...reminds me of someone......
-
911 was just another day in history.
we study wars. we study football plays. we study artwork. when it becomes treason to look at a historical event and ask questions about the science behind it, well, that's a sad day.
To further pwn bonadeuce...
1. Rosie never blames Bush for 911 nor never says its an inside job.
2. The 911 commission never mentioned WTC7. So for her to ask questions about an event that the commission never even gave an official story on, is perfectly reasonable.
3. Bonadeuce is just another example of a loud ignorant person who won't talk evidence. It's eacy to throw out words like "traitor" and "holocaust!". It's tougher to tell us why physics didn't apply on 9/11.
-
Chris Floyd at Empire Burlesque [which is off-line at the moment for some reason] has a good piece today about that Dinesh D'Souza book and the way it too is introducing murder into the mainstream of political debate.
More evidence - if you ask me - that this nation is irretrievably fucked. In 6 years, torture has gone from the unthinkable to the angrily defended. Murder is the next logical step.
-
Someone had Danny Bonaduce on their show as a political commentator? LOL
Did you ever notice that it's always men that get so incensed by O'Donnell? It's never women, I wonder if she was an attractive lesbian if that would change the way men feel about her.
-
Step back for a moment and look at this.
Rosie ODonnell, on her show this morning, was calm, quiet, and very methodical and scientific in her explanation that WTC7 defied physics and should be investigated.
Danny Bonaduce was loud and pissy. He called for another American to be killed for her beliefs on a scientific issue.
It's remarkably simliar to the folks that hanged people for saying the Earth revolved around the sun. Danny is ready to execute another human being because she wonders why a building fell. Think about that.
-
Step back for a moment and look at this.
Rosie ODonnell, on her show this morning, was calm, quiet, and very methodical and scientific in her explanation that WTC7 defied physics and should be investigated.
Danny Bonaduce was loud and pissy. He called for another American to be killed for her beliefs on a scientific issue.
It's remarkably simliar to the folks that hanged people for saying the Earth revolved around the sun. Danny is ready to execute another human being because she wonders why a building fell. Think about that.
please we need to stop the bonaduce talk, he is one of the biggest clowns on earth....he probably doesn't even realize what WTC7 is, he just hears people talk about it and wants more publicity.
-
I wonder if she was an attractive lesbian if that would change the way men feel about her.
Are you saying she's unattractive? ;D
-
Step back for a moment and look at this.
Rosie ODonnell, on her show this morning, was calm, quiet, and very methodical and scientific in her explanation that WTC7 defied physics and should be investigated.
Danny Bonaduce was loud and pissy. He called for another American to be killed for her beliefs on a scientific issue.
It's remarkably simliar to the folks that hanged people for saying the Earth revolved around the sun. Danny is ready to execute another human being because she wonders why a building fell. Think about that.
I would if I thought for a second that Bonaduce had any clue what he was talking about. He's looking for publicity and when you have no talent screaming nonsense is the best way to get it.
I still can't believe someone had him on a show as a political commentator. What was the cartoon lizard from the Geico commercials busy?
-
What was the cartoon lizard from the Geico commercials busy?
Are you kidding? He's red hot right now.
He's not even answering the phone unless it's Larry King.
-
Are you kidding? He's red hot right now.
He's not even answering the phone unless it's Larry King.
LOL, I hadn't thought of that. He and the caveman must be enjoying life with all their new found wealth and fame. ;D
Are you saying she's unattractive? ;D
Yes, tragically that's exactly what I'm saying. Lord knows I love the idea of lesbians but big fat ugly ones just don't cut it. If she looked like Salma Hayek her's would be the highest rated show on television.
-
Bonaduce is like 150 lbs with steroids, an alcoholic and a born against christian. ::) Who would take his ass serious? haha
-
I don't know where to begin with that TREASONIST pig, I've emailed "The View" several times today saying she should be fired and brought up on charges and wether they stick or not remains to be seen but just to see that bitch squirm would be worth the trouble, but being apart of the liberal media you can bet she just might get a raise in pay.
Her defending Iran was should be the last straw, the pig is pure evil, totally anti-american, pro-communist and Bonaduce is right on with his view. I can't remember when I despised someone as much as I do that fat liberal waste of space!
-
please we need to stop the bonaduce talk, he is one of the biggest clowns on earth....he probably doesn't even realize what WTC7 is, he just hears people talk about it and wants more publicity.
Agreed. Why even put an alcoholic, madman like Bonaduce on the show?
Does ANYONE give a shit what his View is? No pun intended. ;)
-
I can't remember when I despised someone as much as I do that fat liberal waste of space!
I can..........George W Bush. >:(
-
Bonaduce is like 150 lbs with steroids, an alcoholic and a born against christian. ::) Who would take his ass serious? haha
I thought those were the requirement for being re-born again christian? Alcoholic and addicted to no less than 2 class III scheduled drugs?
-
I can..........George W Bush. >:(
Screw that............at least he's on our side, remember how bad people critisized Reagan and Churchill and they proved EVERYONE wrong!
-
I thought those were the requirement for being re-born again christian? Alcoholic and addicted to no less than 2 class III scheduled drugs?
I know the thought doesn't sit right...
But if that crazy shit they say is true, Christ died to redeem Bonaduce's peevishness just as much as he died to redeem whatever grander sins you've committed.
:-\
-
Screw that............at least he's on our side, remember how bad people critisized Reagan and Churchill and they proved EVERYONE wrong!
Bwahhaahhhhaaaaaaa
Sure he is.
I wonder if even you belief some of the schit you spew.
-
Screw that............at least he's on our side
His North American Union actions really shows hes on our side...
Are you blind?
-
I don't know where to begin with that TREASONIST pig,
PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW ROSIE IS A "TREASONIST pig", But not your President who has met with leaders of Canada and Mexico to discuss trampaling on our sovereignty and creating a North American Union.
trea·son (trzn)
n.
1. Violation of allegiance toward one's country or sovereign, especially the betrayal of one's country by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.
2. A betrayal of trust or confidence.
-
The 911 commission never commented on WTC7. Not one word.
NIST is a collection of scientists who have continually theorized about the collapses on 9/11, and their findings have changed repeatedly as, time and time again, scientists prove their theories are impossible. They just give them new ones, til those are debunked.
For Rosie to question the NISt findings is good science. She's actually a good patriot, if she is working to further analyze and develop the findings of how this American tragedy occurred.
SImply put, rosie is using her resources to contribute to the development of an evolving theory created by scientists. This isn't treasonous. It's good for our nation. I'd like to see how Danny Bonaduce is contributing.
-
Screw that............at least he's on our side, remember how bad people critisized Reagan and Churchill and they proved EVERYONE wrong!
Mr I, what's in that cigar?? Sounds like the type you pass around the room. ;)
-
trea·son (trzn)
n.
1. Violation of allegiance toward one's country or sovereign, especially the betrayal of one's country by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.
2. A betrayal of trust or confidence.
You just defined Rosie O'Fat to a tee!
-
She's actually a good patriot, if she is working to further analyze and develop the findings of how this American tragedy occurred.
LMAO........."a good patriot" come freaking on, she's defending Iran in their capture of those British troops and saying it was a plot planned by the West!!
-
LMAO........."a good patriot" come freaking on, she's defending Iran in their capture of those British troops and saying it was a plot planned by the West!!
I do think that's carrying it a bit far fetched... My only real question is, so what if it is?
I mean, ok, it's a plot, great... Are we going to fuck around like we have been in Iraq or are we going to go in there and turn the desert to glass... I'm all for option 2 if it makes everything better... I just can't stand doing stuff half assed, which is how I feel we've been doing things in Iraq.
-
I do think that's carrying it a bit far fetched... My only real question is, so what if it is?
I mean, ok, it's a plot, great... Are we going to fuck around like we have been in Iraq or are we going to go in there and turn the desert to glass... I'm all for option 2 if it makes everything better... I just can't stand doing stuff half assed, which is how I feel we've been doing things in Iraq.
Your right, the war has been more or less half assed, the war was justified despite what the pacifists and conspiracy theorists think, my biggest problem is this war is being fought too politically correct, instead of going in leveling the country, we're nit picking and I personally think Bush is fighting this war (politically correct) to appease the left.
Onto Iran, nothing will be done with Iran....period, the Liberals have pretty much given that little midget free reign and he knows it, he took those British troops in retaliation for the sanctions that were put on his country, he's gone against the Geneva Convention, the UN is a useless entity simple because they have people with the same mindset like the Iranian midget, so what else is there to do? The Liberals don't want to do anything but talk, the UN does nothing and Iran wins, if Bush were to even mention going into Iran, the pacifists will go insane. I swear, Liberals are about as useless as they come to defending their country!!
-
Your right, the war has been more or less half assed, the war was justified despite what the pacifists and conspiracy theorists think, my biggest problem is this war is being fought too politically correct, instead of going in leveling the country, we're nit picking and I personally think Bush is fighting this war (politically correct) to appease the left.
Onto Iran, nothing will be done with Iran....period, the Liberals have pretty much given that little midget free reign and he knows it, he took those British troops in retaliation for the sanctions that were put on his country, he's gone against the Geneva Convention, the UN is a useless entity simple because they have people with the same mindset like the Iranian midget, so what else is there to do? The Liberals don't want to do anything but talk, the UN does nothing and Iran wins, if Bush were to even mention going into Iran, the pacifists will go insane. I swear, Liberals are about as useless as they come to defending their country!!
I dunno man... I'm liberal... really I am. I just think if you should go into a fight with the idea of taking care of business... Why dick around?
I'm fine with going after Iran... If it's required, and believe me, it looks like it CERTAINLY is with them... I wish we had not gone to Iraq and instead, focused on Iran in the first place.
They are a real threat unlike Sadsack. The biggest thing is that the war with Iraq has given this guy more clout with is own people... He gets to say "see, I told you so" and that's not good for anyone.
He's a real lunatic though... but they all are... I say we come home, defend our country and if they make a bad move... fuck 'em... we drop hell onto them.
-
Your right, the war has been more or less half assed, the war was justified despite what the pacifists and conspiracy theorists think, my biggest problem is this war is being fought too politically correct, instead of going in leveling the country, we're nit picking and I personally think Bush is fighting this war (politically correct) to appease the left.
Sounds like a boy who has spent ZERO time in Baghdad.
Level the country? For WMD's? For links to 9-11? For links to Bin Laden ( who's that you ask? ) I'll explain B.L. after you get your head OUT of your ass.
BTW....Life long conservative Republican here, so your Liberal crap doesn't work here.
-
LMAO........."a good patriot" come freaking on, she's defending Iran in their capture of those British troops and saying it was a plot planned by the West!!
should she be executed for her beliefs? Imprisoned?
-
should she be executed for her beliefs? Imprisoned?
Tried then imprisoned.
-
Your right, the war has been more or less half assed, the war was justified despite what the pacifists and conspiracy theorists think, my biggest problem is this war is being fought too politically correct, instead of going in leveling the country, we're nit picking and I personally think Bush is fighting this war (politically correct) to appease the left.
Onto Iran, nothing will be done with Iran....period, the Liberals have pretty much given that little midget free reign and he knows it, he took those British troops in retaliation for the sanctions that were put on his country, he's gone against the Geneva Convention, the UN is a useless entity simple because they have people with the same mindset like the Iranian midget, so what else is there to do? The Liberals don't want to do anything but talk, the UN does nothing and Iran wins, if Bush were to even mention going into Iran, the pacifists will go insane. I swear, Liberals are about as useless as they come to defending their country!!
Please explain to us:
- 1. Why Iraq should have been levelled, ...especially when you entered to bring "Freedom" to the Iraqi people?
- 2. What does the Iranian arrest of British troops, have to do with defending the USA?
-
Sounds like a boy who has spent ZERO time in Baghdad.
Level the country? For WMD's? For links to 9-11? For links to Bin Laden ( who's that you ask? ) I'll explain B.L. after you get your head OUT of your ass.
BTW....Life long conservative Republican here, so your Liberal crap doesn't work here.
Let me ask you.........do you know who the enemy is? Can you tell the difference? There was a vote, it was pretty much unanimous and now you want to give in and not finish?
BTW, I'm having a real hard time digesting that last sentence!
-
Tried then imprisoned.
You think Rosie O'Donnell should be tried and imprisoned for saying the Military Commissions Act should be ripped up and replaced with the US Constitution?
Would that not then make the US like all other dictatorships she has scorned in the past, and has taught her citizens to scorn, because they lock up people for their political beliefs?
-
Let me ask you.........do you know who the enemy is? Can you tell the difference? There was a vote, it was pretty much unanimous and now you want to give in and not finish?
BTW, I'm having a real hard time digesting that last sentence!
Maybe that is part of the problem... who the hell is the enemy? I admit it, I find it difficult to tell anymore. (I bet the guys over there fighting are finding it hard to tell also)
Ok, so we voted right... we decided to fight. If the politicians vote again, can they decide not to fight any longer... (I already know the answer to that).
Just seems like everyone says it's either black or white, and I'm thinking right now... there's a lot of grey area.
-
instead of going in leveling the country
Do you know how many innocent people who are just trying to live there lives would be killed?
After reading that I wonder why you even call yourself a Christian?
-
Do you know how many innocent people who are just trying to live there lives would be killed?
After reading that I wonder why you even call yourself a Christian?
Come now... Let's be honest... In times of war, the innocents either get out of the way, they fight WITH you, or they are part of collateral damage. The reality is that because these people do not fight WITH us, and they do not get out of the way, they are casualties...
That's the way of War... It's not pretty, but it is true.
-
Tried then imprisoned.
You're a hell of a lot more dangerous than she is. Love her or hate her at least she cares about people, you on the other hand literally hate those that don't think the way you do.
If you actually believe the stuff you spew here then you need some kind of psychological help. Either that or you need to get laid because you're one angry person.
-
Come now... Let's be honest... In times of war, the innocents either get out of the way, they fight WITH you, or they are part of collateral damage. The reality is that because these people do not fight WITH us, and they do not get out of the way, they are casualties...
That's the way of War... It's not pretty, but it is true.
It's too bad we couldn't have something like "The Thunderdome".
These bastards who want to create wars and send innocent men, women, fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, and innocent civilians to their deaths should be required to fight their own battles, ...themselves.
I'd love to see Bush in a ring with someone.
-
Come now... Let's be honest... In times of war, the innocents either get out of the way, they fight WITH you, or they are part of collateral damage. The reality is that because these people do not fight WITH us, and they do not get out of the way, they are casualties...
That's the way of War... It's not pretty, but it is true.
Yeah, I totally understand that. Hell, if the War was justified collateral damage wouldn't even cross my mind.
If we leveled the Country though like Mr. I suggested many many innocents would have no chance and just be turned to ash. He calls himself a Christian in some threads, and in others he advocates leveling whole countries and locking people up for practicing freedom of speech.
-
Yeah, I totally understand that. If we leveled the Country though like Mr. I suggested many many innocents would have no chance and just be turned to ash.
I don't theink he really wants the country to be turned to glass... he does however want us to use our military might to defeat the enemy with as little loss of US troops as possible, and I understand that... I too believe we should be in there, declaring martial law and showing people that if you are the bad guy, you down. I also think we should be looking at the people and saying, you don't want to fight with us? Then just get out of the way while we protect you.
If they don't like that, then we say fuck it and let them deal with it themselves, I'm tired of it.
It's too bad we couldn't have something like "The Thunderdome".
These bastards who want to create wars and send innocent men, women, fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, and innocent civilians to their deaths should be required to fight their own battles, ...themselves.
I'd love to see Bush in a ring with someone.
Why we are in this war is truly anyones guess... Is is money? power? unfinished business? terrorism? The answer may be all of them, or NONE of them... The reality is that none of us truly knows why we are there. I see people stand up here and say this is why we're there, but truthfully, it's all bunk.
Look, the reality is that if the people wanted us there, they would stand up and fight beside us... ALL of them. You know, look at our major wars... The ones where we knew we were right... especially on our own turf, EVERYONE took up the fight.
Why don't they?
Because they don't care? Maybe... Or perhaps they do care but if you do things for a child, they never learn to do it for themselves.
When I was a kid, my grandmother would throw me into the deep end of the pool, and I would bust my ass trying to swim... I'd sink like a stone and my mom would swim up under me and push me to the surface... They did that over and over and over, until one time, my mom didn't need to push me up anymore... I had learned to swim, and I'm a good swimmer.
The reality is that we're not making them swim... It's time for the Iraqis to put up or shut up. If they faulter we can be there to help, no problem, but it's time to stop doing their work for them.
Where's that plan is all I want to know... when to we get to say, "OK boys, time to swim.
-
I don't theink he really wants the country to be turned to glass... he does however want us to use our military might to defeat the enemy with as little loss of US troops as possible, and I understand that... I too believe we should be in there, declaring martial law and showing people that if you are the bad guy, you down. I also think we should be looking at the people and saying, you don't want to fight with us? Then just get out of the way while we protect you.
I don't know, I believe he meant what he said. I agree with you though, as long as were there we need to do all we can do defeat people who would harm our soldiers.
-
When I was a kid, my grandmother would throw me into the deep end of the pool, and I would bust my ass trying to swim... I'd sink like a stone and my mom would swim up under me and push me to the surface... They did that over and over and over, until one time, my mom didn't need to push me up anymore... I had learned to swim, and I'm a good swimmer.
Thats just about how I learned lol. 8)
-
Let me ask you.........do you know who the enemy is? Can you tell the difference? There was a vote, it was pretty much unanimous and now you want to give in and not finish?
BTW, I'm having a real hard time digesting that last sentence!
Me too. I think many people who constantly talk about being strong and loyal members of their party, while doing nothing but attacking their party, are often struggling with their identity . . . or have abandoned their party.
-
Me too. I think many people who constantly talk about being strong and loyal members of their party, while doing nothing but attacking their party, are often struggling with their identity . . . or have abandoned their party.
Why would anyone be loyal to a political party? I don't get that.
It's not like they're your family or your best friend who got shot in the ass taking a bullet for you. Am I the only one who doesn't get that?
-
Why would anyone be loyal to a political party? I don't get that.
It's not like they're your family or your best friend who got shot in the ass taking a bullet for you. Am I the only one who doesn't get that?
Why wouldn't you be loyal? I know genuine members of political parties and they don't jump ship when they have a "bad" candidate or party member. You will see them volunteering, pounding the pavement, criticizing when necessary, promoting the good things about their party. (Unless they follow Ronald Reagan's Eleventh Commandment, in which case they don't "speak ill of another Republican.")
My previous comments were directed to those who repeatedly give lip service to being members of a party, while their actions convey the opposite.
-
Why wouldn't you be loyal? I know genuine members of political parties and they don't jump ship when they have a "bad" candidate or party member. You will see them volunteering, pounding the pavement, criticizing when necessary, promoting the good things about their party. (Unless they follow Ronald Reagan's Eleventh Commandment, in which case they don't "speak ill of another Republican.")
My previous comments were directed to those who repeatedly give lip service to being members of a party, while their actions convey the opposite.
Why wouldn't I be loyal? Simple.
Parties are not for "people"... Parties are for the power of the party. Plain and Simple.
Neither party cares about the people, they care about what the people want so they can maintain power. They will do whatever it takes to keep the sheep fed and happy, they want nothing more.
To be loyal to a politcal party is akin to being loyal to a water... It's fine when it's doing what you want (providing nourishment), but what good is it when it's drowning you.
How you can give loyalty to a something that is basically a corporation?
I give loyalty to individual people who prove they are deserving of my loyalty, not to some group of people because they say they are a political party.
That seems pretty backwards to be loyal to something like that.
-
Let me ask you.........do you know who the enemy is? Can you tell the difference? There was a vote, it was pretty much unanimous and now you want to give in and not finish?
BTW, I'm having a real hard time digesting that last sentence!
Well, digest it.....because it's true. GOP my whole life.
Do we know who the enemy is? Maybe that's a question that "Bloodbath" Bush should've asked before he started this war......BASED ON PROVEN LIES and DISTORTIONS.
So, Bloodbath lies about WMD's, 9-11 connection to Saddam, MUSHROOM clouds over America, Saddam's connection to Bin Laden.........and IT'S ALL A LIES.
Now, you say level the country? For what?
I happen to be a Conservative Republican who is completely objective and refuses to drink Bush & Co's Koolaid.
Go to Iraq...like I did, have a few dozen GI's DIE a horrible DEATH in your arms, then get back to me and tell me this "oil based BS war" is worth it.
Otherwise, with all due respect.......SHUT THE FvCK UP!!!!
-
LMAO........."a good patriot" come freaking on, she's defending Iran in their capture of those British troops and saying it was a plot planned by the West!!
Yeah, all the while you back "Bloodbath" Bush and his made up B.S. war.
Go to Baghdad Mr I...............I assume you have the same "ass cyst" like your DRUGGED hero Rush Limbaugh had during the Vietnam War and are UNABLE to serve.
Typical GOP chickenhawks.
-
Here's a question about 'leveling them all'
To kill 23 million people because of the actions of 2000 insurgents...
That's the same as killing 11,500 people because "one" of them is an insurgent. Then repeating this action two thousand times.
Would Jesus condone hanging 11,500 men because ONE of them committed a sin? Would he?
-
Here's a question about 'leveling them all'
To kill 23 million people because of the actions of 2000 insurgents...
That's the same as killing 11,500 people because "one" of them is an insurgent. Then repeating this action two thousand times.
Would Jesus condone hanging 11,500 men because ONE of them committed a sin? Would he?
240.....the VAST majority of "insurgents" are normal Iraqi's who are sick and tired of our troops in their country.
How angry would you be if Iraq invaded America, killed our leaders and our families, based on proven lies? Leveled American cities.......killed 650,000 U.S. citizens (Harvard estimate) and refused to leave. Not to mention, lack of clean water, electricity etc.
I assume most of us would become "American insurgents" and defend our country.
Although I'm a Republican, I still have a fuctioning brain, and can easily access the ever CHANGING Bush reasoning for invading a country that posed ZERO threat to America.
The GOP flock continues to fasten their blinders........and follow "the W.H. moron."
-
240.....the VAST majority of "insurgents" are normal Iraqi's who are sick and tired of our troops in their country.
How angry would you be if Iraq invaded America, killed our leaders and our families, based on proven lies? Leveled American cities.......killed 650,000 U.S. citizens (Harvard estimate) and refused to leave. Not to mention, lack of clean water, electricity etc.
I assume most of us would become "American insurgents" and defend our country.
Although I'm a Republican, I still have a fuctioning brain, and can easily access the ever CHANGING Bush reasoning for invading a country that posed ZERO threat to America.
The GOP flock continues to fasten their blinders........and follow "the W.H. moron."
I agree - with any occupying force in my country, you'd better believe I'd be rigging mailbox bombs for those chinese/russian bastards when they came down my road.
I wanted to see if those who traditionally took the moral high ground on this issue - claiming liberals are going to hell, etc - were willing to step up and say "Yes, klling 11,500 innocents to get one bad guy IS morally acceptable".
My guess is, they won't.
-
Why wouldn't I be loyal? Simple.
Parties are not for "people"... Parties are for the power of the party. Plain and Simple.
Neither party cares about the people, they care about what the people want so they can maintain power. They will do whatever it takes to keep the sheep fed and happy, they want nothing more.
To be loyal to a politcal party is akin to being loyal to a water... It's fine when it's doing what you want (providing nourishment), but what good is it when it's drowning you.
How you can give loyalty to a something that is basically a corporation?
I give loyalty to individual people who prove they are deserving of my loyalty, not to some group of people because they say they are a political party.
That seems pretty backwards to be loyal to something like that.
I don't agree with everything you say, but this is a good argument for being an independent.
-
For Rosie to question the NISt findings is good science.
You have a habit of moving the goalposts to support your opinions. Rosie didn't question the findings. She flat out said that explosives brought down Tower 7 (see link below). If she's gonna make an inflamatory statement like that, she should have at least a shred of evidence to support that claim.
Wiring a building of that size with explosives isn't a small job. There must be some witnesses or pictures.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1iIdflPRGw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1iIdflPRGw)
-
You have a habit of moving the goalposts to support your opinions. Rosie didn't question the findings. She flat out said that explosives brought down Tower 7 (see link below). If she's gonna make an inflamatory statement like that, she should have at least a shred of evidence to support that claim.
Wiring a building of that size with explosives isn't a small job. There must be some witnesses or pictures.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1iIdflPRGw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1iIdflPRGw)
The 9-11 commission had NO explanation how building 7 fell on it's footprint in approx. 8 seconds.
Hummmmmmmmmm. :-X
-
You have a habit of moving the goalposts to support your opinions. Rosie didn't question the findings. She flat out said that explosives brought down Tower 7 (see link below). If she's gonna make an inflamatory statement like that, she should have at least a shred of evidence to support that claim.
Wiring a building of that size with explosives isn't a small job. There must be some witnesses or pictures.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1iIdflPRGw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1iIdflPRGw)
a "shred" of evidence?
I'd say a powderized building is a bit of evidence.
I'd say the NYPD/NYFD/EMT/Military statements are a bit of evidence.
And she didn't accuse anyone of it.
Seriously, the 911 commission didn't even talk about WTC7. Why would they ignore the collapse of a 47-story skyscraper housing many valuable federal agencies, and more importantly, a great deal of evidence in ongoing cases against Enron and Worldcom?
-
a "shred" of evidence?
I'd say a powderized building is a bit of evidence.
I'd say the NYPD/NYFD/EMT/Military statements are a bit of evidence.
And she didn't accuse anyone of it.
Seriously, the 911 commission didn't even talk about WTC7. Why would they ignore the collapse of a 47-story skyscraper housing many valuable federal agencies, and more importantly, a great deal of evidence in ongoing cases against Enron and Worldcom?
240, only one explanation........Deaf, Dumb and Blind.
-
I agree - with any occupying force in my country, you'd better believe I'd be rigging mailbox bombs for those chinese/russian bastards when they came down my road.
I wanted to see if those who traditionally took the moral high ground on this issue - claiming liberals are going to hell, etc - were willing to step up and say "Yes, klling 11,500 innocents to get one bad guy IS morally acceptable".
My guess is, they won't.
the Iraqi's want us to leave. Don't they realize if they stop fighting each other and trying to kill americans the "occupiers" would leave sooner.
I guess the Sunni's don't want any stability or to let the government get any kind of momentum because then they will be SOL.
-
I think Rosie is an idiot and I also find her disgusting. But I will give her props for her charitable contributions to veterans hospitals.
-
the Iraqi's want us to leave. Don't they realize if they stop fighting each other and trying to kill americans the "occupiers" would leave sooner.
I guess the Sunni's don't want any stability or to let the government get any kind of momentum because then they will be SOL.
They hate americans. They hate each other. They're going to kill until 1) all their enemies are gone, or 2) they are killed.
It's not our fight - the sunni/shiite mess.
We didn't cause the cultural rift. We facilitated the fighting by removing the societal controls (if you pulled that domestic shit on saddam's watch, your family would be raped hamburger by sunset.)
We fixed it by installing a newly elected democratic leadership, and then we trained their police force for the last, what, almost 3 years now?
Time to get out of the cities. Let em do their job.
-
They hate americans. They hate each other. They're going to kill until 1) all their enemies are gone, or 2) they are killed.
It's not our fight - the sunni/shiite mess.
We didn't cause the cultural rift. We facilitated the fighting by removing the societal controls (if you pulled that domestic shit on saddam's watch, your family would be raped hamburger by sunset.)
We fixed it by installing a newly elected democratic leadership, and then we trained their police force for the last, what, almost 3 years now?
Time to get out of the cities. Let em do their job.
Hate to say it, ...but all you've really done is train more terorists.
The iraqi police force has long been known to have more loyalty to their own sectarian militia groups than to the federal Iraqi government.
-
Hate to say it, ...but all you've really done is train more terorists.
The iraqi police force has long been known to have more loyalty to their own sectarian militia groups than to the federal Iraqi government.
Sucks to say it, but this is true... We've taught them how we fight now... Next time, we'll need a whole new game plan.
Might I suggest glass blowing?
-
They hate americans. They hate each other. They're going to kill until 1) all their enemies are gone, or 2) they are killed.
It's not our fight - the sunni/shiite mess.
We didn't cause the cultural rift. We facilitated the fighting by removing the societal controls (if you pulled that domestic shit on saddam's watch, your family would be raped hamburger by sunset.)
We fixed it by installing a newly elected democratic leadership, and then we trained their police force for the last, what, almost 3 years now?
Time to get out of the cities. Let em do their job.
That is Iraq in a nutshell.
Great explanation 240.
-
Screw that............at least he's on our side, remember how bad people critisized Reagan and Churchill and they proved EVERYONE wrong!
They didn't read their history books...Churchill was called a complete idiot for thinking that Hitler needed to be controlled.
-
Sounds like a boy who has spent ZERO time in Baghdad.
Level the country? For WMD's? For links to 9-11? For links to Bin Laden ( who's that you ask? ) I'll explain B.L. after you get your head OUT of your ass.
BTW....Life long conservative Republican here, so your Liberal crap doesn't work here.
why is your opinion of Baghdad listened to more than the other 3 guys that have been there and say the opposite? Oh that's right, you are telling them what they want to hear.
-
You think Rosie O'Donnell should be tried and imprisoned for saying the Military Commissions Act should be ripped up and replaced with the US Constitution?
Would that not then make the US like all other dictatorships she has scorned in the past, and has taught her citizens to scorn, because they lock up people for their political beliefs?
Tell me canadian...why should the constitution be allpied to foreign detainees?
-
It's too bad we couldn't have something like "The Thunderdome".
These bastards who want to create wars and send innocent men, women, fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, and innocent civilians to their deaths should be required to fight their own battles, ...themselves.
I'd love to see Bush in a ring with someone.
"innocent men, women, fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, and innocent civilians to their deaths should be required to fight their own battles, ...themselves".
None of us in the military need you to "save" us from going to Iraq. And these civilians you talk about....They APPLY for those jobs. It isn't like they apply for the job in New York and one day get shipped out...They apply for a contractor job in Iraq....
-
"innocent men, women, fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, and innocent civilians to their deaths should be required to fight their own battles, ...themselves".
None of us in the military need you to "save" us from going to Iraq. And these civilians you talk about....They APPLY for those jobs. It isn't like they apply for the job in New York and one day get shipped out...They apply for a contractor job in Iraq....
You are so blinded by military bloodlust you can't see the forest for the trees....
...or is it that you do not consider Iraqi's people.
Truth be told, I don't give a shit about dickheads like you. Go to Iraq, get your balls blown off for all I care.
There are enough good men & women who are serving who I'm concerned about to give a damn about your kind.
-
You are so blinded by military bloodlust you can't see the forest for the trees....
...or is it that you do not consider Iraqi's people.
Truth be told, I don't give a shit about dickheads like you. Go to Iraq, get your balls blown off for all I care.
There are enough good men & women who are serving who I'm concerned about to give a damn about your kind.
you are still a slut
-
why is your opinion of Baghdad listened to more than the other 3 guys that have been there and say the opposite? Oh that's right, you are telling them what they want to hear.
I think not.
-
Someone had Danny Bonaduce on their show as a political commentator? LOL
Did you ever notice that it's always men that get so incensed by O'Donnell? It's never women, I wonder if she was an attractive lesbian if that would change the way men feel about her.
If angelina jolie was a lesbian and came out against the war, i'd march with her!