Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: MB_722 on September 02, 2008, 06:54:25 PM
-
no kidding.
you know why? The military is capable of protecting America and always has been.
-
no kidding.
you know why? The military is capable of protecting America and always has been.
you might eat your words if obama gets in and has his way.
-
Yeah, really. Like it takes skill for Bush to point out some country on a map and say, "Bomb that."
Oh, I'm sorry--Bush, point out a country on a map? Ha!
-
no kidding.
you know why? The military is capable of protecting America and always has been.
Did you catch Ron Pauls speech? It was fucking awsome! The energy of the crowd was amazing and wouldn't you know it, he talked about things that matter and didnt make outrages promises like some other politicians. wow.
-
no I didn't I didn't want to d/l the plugin.
catch it on YT later
-
Bush brought up more 9/11 propaganda and fear again
-
Yeah, really. Like it takes skill for Bush to point out some country on a map and say, "Bomb that."
Oh, I'm sorry--Bush, point out a country on a map? Ha!
well when you scale back the military and its research and development like obama plans to do you open yourself up to bad things.
-
Bush brought up more 9/11 propaganda and fear again
And that's so not like him
-
you might eat your words if obama gets in and has his way.
what you are saying is fear mongering
-
Did you catch Ron Pauls speech? It was fucking awsome! The energy of the crowd was amazing and wouldn't you know it, he talked about things that matter and didnt make outrages promises like some other politicians. wow.
Frak. I missed it. >:(
You have a link?
-
what you are saying is fear mongering
no what im saying is common fuking sense, you scale back on military and research and development and we will fall behind in those terms and that opens us up to bad things.
-
no what im saying is common fuking sense, you scale back on military and research and development and we will fall behind in those terms and that opens us up to bad things.
no
what you are saying is vote mccain if you don't want to get attacked.
-
well when you scale back the military and its research and development like obama plans to do you open yourself up to bad things.
Like what exactly?.
-
no
what you are saying is vote mccain if you don't want to get attacked.
no im not saying we wont get attacked if mccain is president either...lets face it if these guys really want to hit us they are gonna hit us regardless of whos president, but scaling back on our military and getting rid of our nukes isnt the answer.
-
Like what exactly?.
Iono im not psychic but ill throw some out there for you, getting rid of our nukes while other countries keep theirs and develop more. Falling behind in military r&d could lead to loss of future wars or combat and more deaths than necessary in those events.
-
getting rid of nukes will not happen.
-
getting rid of nukes will not happen.
hey, obama wants to do it not me brother
-
hey, obama wants to do it not me brother
wants to being the key words
-
wants to being the key words
i agree it will more than likely never happen but to have a person running for office wants to take our country in that direction is kinda scary.
-
Iono im not psychic but ill throw some out there for you, getting rid of our nukes while other countries keep theirs and develop more. Falling behind in military r&d could lead to loss of future wars or combat and more deaths than necessary in those events.
What country even comes close to America's military might? I dont think having more nukes or having more soilders changes anything. Smart foreign policy stops future wars from ever happening and saves the most lives and money.
-
What country even comes close to America's military might? I dont think having more nukes or having more soilders changes anything. Smart foreign policy stops future wars from ever happening and saves the most lives and money.
+1
-
What country even comes close to America's military might? I dont think having more nukes or having more soilders changes anything. Smart foreign policy stops future wars from ever happening and saves the most lives and money.
do you think that us having less nukes or military might would change things???
I agree but sometimes you cant stop shit and sometimes countries just dont see eye to eye...wars happen and thats fact there will always be war and I for one want to be on the side with the best military which means keeping up with military r&d.
-
no kidding.
you know why? The military is capable of protecting America and always has been.
This is a joke, right? Didn’t 9/11 happen on Bush’s watch? For nine months Richard Clarke tried to warn Condi, Bush, and company about the impending danger of Al Queda and they dismissed, discounted, or otherwise ignored him--until the whole thing blew up in their faces! Remember the CIA memo entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike in the United States"?
Note: many years later Bin Laden still has not been caught! Any way one looks at it this is failure on a grand scale. :'(
Grade: F
-
This is a joke, right? Didn’t 9/11 happen on Bush’s watch? For nine months Richard Clarke tried to warn Condi, Bush, and company about the impending danger of Al Queda and they dismissed, discounted, or otherwise ignored him--until the whole thing blew up in their faces! Remember the CIA memo entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike in the United States"?
Note: many years later Bin Laden still has not been caught! Any way one looks at it this is failure on a grand scale. :'(
Grade: F
LOL poor arguement, you would have to blame every terrorist attack that happend on clintons watch to him as well. hind sight is 20/20
-
do you think that us having less nukes or military might would change things???
I agree but sometimes you cant stop shit and sometimes countries just dont see eye to eye...wars happen and thats fact there will always be war and I for one want to be on the side with the best military which means keeping up with military r&d.
Why dont we ask Canada, they seem to be handling those terrorists pretty well, they havent been invaded yet. :)
Before you freak out, I'm joking.In a serious kinda way.
-
This is a joke, right? Didn’t 9/11 happen on Bush’s watch? For nine months Richard Clarke tried to warn Condi, Bush, and company about the impending danger of Al Queda and they dismissed, discounted, or otherwise ignored him--until the whole thing blew up in their faces! Remember the CIA memo entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike in the United States"?
Note: many years later Bin Laden still has not been caught! Any way one looks at it this is failure on a grand scale. :'(
Grade: F
it's sarcasm.
The military is capable of protecting America and always has. Blame the president and intelligence agencies for 9/11. Bush mentioned 9/11 in his speech tonight. wonder why ::)
It's propaganda
-
Why dont we ask Canada, they seem to be handling those terrorists pretty well, they havent been invaded yet. :)
Before you freak out, I'm joking.In a serious kinda way.
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/06/03/canada.terror/index.html
many more if you want me to post them...
-
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/06/03/canada.terror/index.html
many more if you want me to post them...
they were caught by the police. what does that have to do with having a huge military to stop terroists, when Canada has been just as successful (or better) at stopping attacks on their own land since they had none? You lost me with the point you were trying to make.
-
they were caught by the police. what does that have to do with having a huge military to stop terroists, when Canada has been just as successful (or better) at stopping attacks on their own land since they had none? You lost me with the point you were trying to make.
ahh we got crossed, i never meant to say that having a large military would stop terrorist attacks. Having a large military will deter attacks though but like i said it doesnt really matter what size military we have if terrorist want to hit us they will. Scaling down on military wont help that situation though but my point was more geared towards national defense from other nations.
Although it not fair to compare the US and canada in terms of terrorist attacks and you know it.
-
Although it not fair to compare the US and canada in terms of terrorist attacks and you know it.
Cool.
But can I ask why can't we compare them? What are they doing so different that they don't have to worry as much about terrorists as Americans do? Are they not free and prosperous? don't the terrorists hate their way of life as much as they hate America's? Could it be that they don't meddle in middle eastern affairs as much as we do and therfore they don't have as much to worry about maybe?
-
Cool.
But can I ask why can't we compare them? What are they doing so different that they don't have to worry as much about terrorists as Americans do? Are they not free and prosperous? don't the terrorists hate their way of life as much as they hate America's? Could it be that they don't meddle in middle eastern affairs as much as we do and therfore they don't have as much to worry about maybe?
they do hate america now is it b/c we are properous probably not as much as ppl like to tout and yell about it but im sure that has something to do with it. More so than not it is b/c of our foreign policy and i wouldnt say meddle, when you have allies you have to stick up for them so isreal brings us alot of grief from the middle east just as an example, and when you have principles you have to stand for those as well. Its not necessarily a wrong policy and not really one you can go back on as the motion is already set in motion. Maybe we can look way down the line and say now this action right here shouldnt have been commited and maybe we could have avoided all of this but terrorist wouldnt leave us alone if we packed up and left and you know this. Whether you agree with neoconservatism or not the US would be getting trashed for not doing things so its a damned if you do and a damned if you dont kinda thing.
-
This is a joke, right? Didn’t 9/11 happen on Bush’s watch? For nine months Richard Clarke tried to warn Condi, Bush, and company about the impending danger of Al Queda and they dismissed, discounted, or otherwise ignored him--until the whole thing blew up in their faces! Remember the CIA memo entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike in the United States"?
Note: many years later Bin Laden still has not been caught! Any way one looks at it this is failure on a grand scale. :'(
Grade: F
Are you saying Mccain = 4 more years of blaming everything on Clinton, and 4 more years of Osama running free?
-
This is a joke, right? Didn’t 9/11 happen on Bush’s watch? For nine months Richard Clarke tried to warn Condi, Bush, and company about the impending danger of Al Queda and they dismissed, discounted, or otherwise ignored him--until the whole thing blew up in their faces! Remember the CIA memo entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike in the United States"?
Note: many years later Bin Laden still has not been caught! Any way one looks at it this is failure on a grand scale. :'(
Grade: F
Bin Laden is hiding in San Fransisco.
You people will allow anything there....
-
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHHAHAh HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA HAH HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH
;D ;D ;D