Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: bigdumbbell on March 02, 2006, 09:32:29 PM

Title: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 02, 2006, 09:32:29 PM
yahoo has links to pages and pages on the sport of cricket and
zero links to the sport of bodybuiding on it's sports website
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: tony b on March 02, 2006, 09:42:39 PM
Cricket is a sport.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: jwb on March 02, 2006, 09:47:55 PM
Cricket takes time to appreciate but it's a cool sport...

Was lucky enough to see Steve Waugh (the michael jordon of cricket) play his last game.

You can imagine how drunk the crowd can get after 5 straight days of the same match...
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on March 02, 2006, 09:56:33 PM
yahoo has links to pages and pages on the sport of cricket and
zero links to the sport of bodybuiding on it's sports website

Could it be because BODYBUILDING IS NOT A SPORT AND BODYBUILDERS ARE NOT ATHLETES  :-X??
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: mame09 on March 02, 2006, 10:45:11 PM
we aussies love cricket. its one of the sports were australia dominates yet another sport
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: GoneAway on March 02, 2006, 10:58:37 PM
Bodybuilding is more of a cult hobby than a sport, but I still consider it a sport.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Max_Rep on March 02, 2006, 11:17:43 PM
Antigua is investing $400 Million on improving their Airport to host the 2007 Cricket World Cup. I think that speaks volumes on the popularity of cricket verses bodybuilding.

 
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: jwb on March 02, 2006, 11:38:04 PM
Antigua is investing $400 Million on improving their Airport to host the 2007 Cricket World Cup. I think that speaks volumes on the popularity of cricket verses bodybuilding.
 
Shit yeah I'm gonna try to make that one if possible...
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ARMZ on March 02, 2006, 11:44:38 PM
Why is it that the only people that say bodybuilding is a sport are the big guys that do well in it.. The guys that can't do it, love to put it down. 
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Max_Rep on March 02, 2006, 11:49:27 PM

Shit yeah I'm gonna try to make that one if possible...


Can you imagine the sheer numbers of quality poon that will be there? 
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: jwb on March 03, 2006, 12:08:21 AM
Can you imagine the sheer numbers of quality poon that will be there? 
Man you should have been in Sydney when the rugby world cup was on in 2003!

The 2000 Olympics was a fvck fest as well...
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Bluto on March 03, 2006, 01:17:41 AM
cricket

(http://www.pacificislandbooks.com/JPEGS/kula%20cricket.jpg)
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: seanashbrook on March 03, 2006, 12:11:14 PM
my stomach just turned. threw up my protein shake.thanks for that. that nitrotech celltech stack was pricey!
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: BroadStreetBruiser on March 03, 2006, 12:12:30 PM
you know those villagers are hurting for some white conquering cock!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: DEFCON on March 03, 2006, 12:22:20 PM
Could it be because BODYBUILDING IS NOT A SPORT AND BODYBUILDERS ARE NOT ATHLETES  :-X??
BINGO!
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ARMZ on March 03, 2006, 12:46:22 PM
Could it be because BODYBUILDING IS NOT A SPORT AND BODYBUILDERS ARE NOT ATHLETES  :-X??


And these people are athletes??  haha  I think bbers look alittle bit more athletic.. 
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Tuna Sammich on March 03, 2006, 12:50:05 PM
Of course Bodybuilding's a sport. It's right up there with Spelling Bee's and Hot dog eating contests.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: jwb on March 03, 2006, 02:33:21 PM
And these people are athletes??  haha  I think bbers look alittle bit more athletic.. 
yeah this dude isn't athletic at all...
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: The Body Farm on March 03, 2006, 02:36:31 PM
When I was overseas, this was about the only sport other than soccer that was ever on TV.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Motorbreath on March 03, 2006, 02:37:32 PM
Antigua is investing $400 Million on improving their Airport to host the 2007 Cricket World Cup. I think that speaks volumes on the popularity of cricket verses bodybuilding.
Your right, I was there Super Bowl weekend and the Cricket stadium is already completed, the people there are really excited, it is a popular sport w/ them and it will bring a ton of $$$ to the Island. The Airport construction is underway.
I love Antiqua.....best beaches in the world.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 03, 2006, 02:38:43 PM
Why is it that the only people that say bodybuilding is a sport are the big guys that do well in it.. The guys that can't do it, love to put it down. 


You're neither a Big guy or a guy who does well in bodybuilding yet you argue it's a sport.

Explain that.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: jwb on March 03, 2006, 02:39:36 PM
When I was overseas, this was about the only sport other than soccer that was ever on TV.
It's true...

Of the 3 main american sports only basketball has an international presence.

Football and baseball are very minor sports world wide
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: The Body Farm on March 03, 2006, 02:42:24 PM
Cricket seemed to be a little more action-filled than baseball though.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ARMZ on March 03, 2006, 02:44:24 PM
You're neither a Big guy or a guy who does well in bodybuilding yet you argue it's a sport.
Explain that.


I'm a hell of alot bigger than you can ever be.  And I do just fine in bodybuilding thanx.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 03, 2006, 02:45:33 PM
I'm a hell of alot bigger than you can ever be.  And I do just fine in bodybuilding thanx.


Prove it.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: jwb on March 03, 2006, 02:49:37 PM
Cricket seemed to be a little more action-filled than baseball though.
Especially the one day game

8 hours of play often comes down to the final ball of the day with the batsman needing to hit the ball to the fence or even over the fence (kinda like a home run) for his team to win. All this after 600 balls have been bowled that day already...
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 03, 2006, 02:51:18 PM
what's it gonna take for bodybuilding to be considered a serious sport because the IFBB aint gettin it done
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ARMZ on March 03, 2006, 02:52:56 PM
Prove it.



You think I hide on here with no pics?
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 03, 2006, 02:53:29 PM
You think I hide on here with no pics?


So let's see them.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ARMZ on March 03, 2006, 02:55:11 PM
So let's see them.

Want me to teach you how to find my site?  I'll walk it through for you if you want..
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 03, 2006, 03:04:12 PM
Want me to teach you how to find my site?  I'll walk it through for you if you want..


Assuming you're this "ian van guilder" guy(assuming)...I've never heard of you. Meaning you obviously don't do so well in bodybuilding circles.

I saw the website and under "Competitions and awards" there's nothing listed.
Same with "Sponsorships".

And the only photographs on his site are too blurry to make out anything.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ARMZ on March 03, 2006, 03:06:17 PM
Assuming you're this "ian van guilder" guy(assuming)...I've never heard of you. Meaning you obviously don't do so well in bodybuilding circles.
I saw the website and under "Competitions and awards" there's nothing listed.
Same with "Sponsorships".
And the only photographs on his site are too blurry to make out anything.

Like I said, bigger than you will ever be and I do well in bodybuilding.  Now let's see some pics of you Johnny.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 03, 2006, 03:10:20 PM
Like I said, bigger than you will ever be and I do well in bodybuilding.  Now let's see some pics of you Johnny.


1.I never said I was big,I said you weren't.

2.You don't do well in bodybuilding competitions since i've never heard of you.

3.You're alot older than I am.

4.You obviously have been using steroids for years.

5.Post a photograph of yourself holding a pice of paper saying "Johnny Apollo" on it and flexing your bicep.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ARMZ on March 03, 2006, 03:16:04 PM
1.I never said I was big,I said you weren't.
2.You don't do well in bodybuilding competitions since i've never heard of you.
3.You're alot older than I am.
4.You obviously have been using steroids for years.
5.Post a photograph of yourself holding a pice of paper saying "Johnny Apollo" on it and flexing your bicep.

Just e-mail from the site I'll gladly e-mail you back.  I'm at my gym now working, so maybe later I'll send you a pic with your name all over my body.  lol
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 03, 2006, 03:27:28 PM
Just e-mail from the site I'll gladly e-mail you back.  I'm at my gym now working, so maybe later I'll send you a pic with your name all over my body.  lol
whatta way to start a relationship :)
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: HRDCOR on March 03, 2006, 03:36:59 PM
Quote
you know those villagers are hurting for some white conquering cock!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOL LOL now that was funny dude ! ;D
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Earl1972 on March 03, 2006, 05:13:07 PM
I can't imagine what it's like to always be proven wrong.  How do you guys sleep at night?

http://dir.yahoo.com/Recreation/Sports/Weightlifting/Bodybuilding/

E
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 03, 2006, 06:29:53 PM
that isnt the yahoo sports website  lol
that's some sort of jerk-off support group listing
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Earl1972 on March 03, 2006, 06:32:22 PM
that isnt the yahoo sports website  lol
that's some sort of jerk-off support group listing

it's the yahoo sports directory

do your homework next time ::)

E
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 03, 2006, 06:34:51 PM
lol  yeah and comprehending aint your strong suit   
i said website link not directory
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Earl1972 on March 03, 2006, 06:39:06 PM
lol  yeah and comprehending aint your stong suit   
i said website link not directory

who gives a flying fuck whether it's a website or directory?

you want a website here's a website in fact here's 2 websites that say it's a sport

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodybuilding

http://www.onelang.com/encyclopedia/index.php/List_of_sports

bow your head >:(

E
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 03, 2006, 06:41:51 PM
who gives a flying f**k whether it's a website or directory?
you want a website here's a website in fact here's 2 websites that say it's a sport
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodybuilding
http://www.onelang.com/encyclopedia/index.php/List_of_sports
bow your head >:(
E

nah i aint into that scene
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 04, 2006, 07:49:06 AM
who gives a flying f**k whether it's a website or directory?
you want a website here's a website in fact here's 2 websites that say it's a sport
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bodybuilding
http://www.onelang.com/encyclopedia/index.php/List_of_sports
bow your head >:(
E


These are unreliable sources. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone.

The DEFINITION OF SPORT IN THE DICTIONARY is very specific. It does NOT include Bodybuilding.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Earl1972 on March 04, 2006, 09:52:46 AM
These are unreliable sources. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone.
The DEFINITION OF SPORT IN THE DICTIONARY is very specific. It does NOT include Bodybuilding.

the definition matches bodybuilding

find me a "reliable" link that says it isn't a sport

I've provided 3

you and the haters - 0 :-\

E
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 04, 2006, 09:58:18 AM
you aint provided one :)
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 04, 2006, 11:03:48 AM
the definition matches bodybuilding
find me a "reliable" link that says it isn't a sport
I've provided 3
you and the haters - 0 :-\
E



Sport-
Quote
• noun 1 an activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others.


http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/sport?view=uk

Sport-
Quote
a game, competition or activity needing physical effort and skill that is played or done according to rules, for enjoyment and/or as a job

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=76820&dict=CALD


Sport-
Quote
Physical activity that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often engaged in competitively.


http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sport&r=66

Sport is defined as an activity involving PHYSICAL EXERTION AND SKILL. Standing onstage and being judged on LOOKS is not a sport. Assuming flexing is "physical exertion" and that's a stretch to say the least,They are NOT JUDGED on flexing or posing but on looks.
In a REAL SPORT you come in at your best physical ability. In BODYBUILDING,Bodybuilders come in AT THEIR WEAKEST PHYSICALLY. When they are standing onstage after weeks of dieting they physically are at their weakest points. If bodybuilding were a real sport this would not cut it.

So we've proven Standing onstage in bodybuilding competitions is not a "Sport".


How about the physical effort it takes to lift the weights?

This is not a sport either because 1.They are not judged by how much they can lift or how hard they train. 2.The Training does not follow a set of "Rules" for competition. The bodybuilders training techniques vary vastly.


So the fact of the matter is Bodybuilding is not a sport from any aspect of the matter.

Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Earl1972 on March 04, 2006, 11:18:43 AM
flexing every muscle simultaneously is physical exertion just ask Arnold

just ask anybody who has competed IN A MEANINGFUL SHOW posing onstage is a workout in itself

posing well takes skill it is common knowledge paul dillet would have placed higher if he knew how to pose

ronnie outposed jay to win the 01 Olympia

many bodybuilders have placed higher because they did well in the posing round

proves it's a sport

also none of what you said changes the fact that Yahoo and those other two sites list it as a sport

"but i don't see it on ESPN"

SHUTUP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

E

Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: gordiano on March 04, 2006, 11:39:26 AM
Could it be because BODYBUILDING IS NOT A SPORT AND BODYBUILDERS ARE NOT ATHLETES  :-X??

Careful now. The last time I said that my thread got erased.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: pumpster on March 04, 2006, 11:39:40 AM
Bowling must be a sport if Cricket is. Cricket must be VERY demanding if games last 5 consecutive 8-hour days. ::) Plenty of time for ass-picking during those "epic" battles. Even curling's more athletic.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ToxicAvenger on March 04, 2006, 12:37:20 PM
we aussies love cricket. its one of the sports were australia dominates yet another sport

the pakis are gonna win the next world cup!

count on it  ;)

the teams coming together and afridi is starting to look like a  faster scoring ponting!  ;)
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ToxicAvenger on March 04, 2006, 12:39:00 PM
the ashes and much mroe inside here..esp at the bottom of the page..where there is a link of shoaib getting lara in the face!
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=57826.0

masterclass fielding...

watch this before you knock cricket

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7341309384834537116&q=cricket
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: pumpster on March 04, 2006, 12:40:15 PM
No offense of course  ;D but if the Pakis can be world champs is it a serious sport?
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ToxicAvenger on March 04, 2006, 12:41:18 PM
No offense of course  ;D but if the Pakis can be world champs is it a serious sport?
\
you tell me
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8452989030204036720&q=shoaib+akthar


 ;)

now thats fast!
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 04, 2006, 12:41:41 PM
judging on looks is a sport    LOL
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: pumpster on March 04, 2006, 12:43:10 PM
Those cricket balls are as hard as a rock; Cricket should come in to the 21st century with some better protective gear.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ToxicAvenger on March 04, 2006, 12:44:54 PM
Those cricket balls are as hard as a rock; Cricket should come in to the 21st century with some better protective gear.

they have

but a ball moving one way before bouncing and then moving another after the bounce coming is still unplayable..

here is a short video on fast bowling...see some smazing stuff in here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4410213710170264644&q=cricket
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ToxicAvenger on March 04, 2006, 12:48:53 PM
why the pakis have a shot

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5166120404678682905&q=cricket+pakistan
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 04, 2006, 12:50:24 PM
strong balls are important in sports
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: pumpster on March 04, 2006, 12:53:42 PM
Basically they should be wearing football helmets.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ToxicAvenger on March 04, 2006, 01:14:15 PM
Basically they should be wearing football helmets.

that'll never happen in cricket..it goes against tradation...
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ToxicAvenger on March 04, 2006, 01:30:48 PM
Antigua is investing $400 Million on improving their Airport to host the 2007 Cricket World Cup. I think that speaks volumes on the popularity of cricket verses bodybuilding.
 

max..i didn't know you were a cricketer...where ya from?
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: jwb on March 04, 2006, 02:09:50 PM
Pumpster,

it can be VERY taxing.

A good batsman may bat continously for 2 days straight without a break if he is very good.

Same with a good fast bowler if his team is weak or they have injuries he may bowl for most of the game.

Of course when one team is batting only 2 of their players are on the field at one time.

A good batsman might field for 2 days then bat for two days straight though...
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 04, 2006, 02:26:33 PM
flexing every muscle simultaneously is physical exertion just ask Arnold
just ask anybody who has competed IN A MEANINGFUL SHOW posing onstage is a workout in itself
posing well takes skill it is common knowledge paul dillet would have placed higher if he knew how to pose
ronnie outposed jay to win the 01 Olympia
many bodybuilders have placed higher because they did well in the posing round
proves it's a sport
also none of what you said changes the fact that Yahoo and those other two sites list it as a sport
"but i don't see it on ESPN"
SHUTUP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
E


Give me one source where the judges said Ronnie won the 2001 Olympia due to his superior posing and not his superior physique.


Just because flexing onstage requires physical exertion does not mean they are judged on flexing. They aren't. They are judged on looks.

Yahoo simply made a mistake of classifying bodybuilding as a "Sport" opposed to a "hobby"
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Max_Rep on March 04, 2006, 04:58:18 PM
max..i didn't know you were a cricketer...where ya from?
Toxic… I honestly have never seen a game. We finance municipal projects such as energy projects, communications, Airports etc. The Airport project in Antigua has been presented to us for financing. Parliament has not yet approved the entire project yet but the purpose of the renovation in to host the World Cup. My research included reading about Antigua and its passion for cricket.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 04, 2006, 05:01:56 PM
Toxic… I honestly have never seen a game. We finance municipal projects such as energy projects, communications, Airports etc. The Airport project in Antigua has been presented to us for financing. Parliament has not yet approved the entire project yet but the purpose of the renovation in to host the World Cup. My research included reading about Antigua and its passion for cricket.

um i have been following the sport of cricket for a long time
and the bodybuilding beauty shows for almost as long
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 04, 2006, 05:18:49 PM
Give me one source where the judges said Ronnie won the 2001 Olympia due to his superior posing and not his superior physique.
Just because flexing onstage requires physical exertion does not mean they are judged on flexing. They aren't. They are judged on looks.
Yahoo simply made a mistake of classifying bodybuilding as a "Sport" opposed to a "hobby"

yahoo DOESNT recognize bodybuilding as a pro-sport on it's main webpage.  that is the purpose of this thread.  yahoo recognizes cricket as a sport on it's main webpage.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: jwb on March 04, 2006, 05:30:13 PM
yahoo DOESNT recognize bodybuilding as a pro-sport on it's main webpage.  that is the purpose of this thread.  yahoo recognizes cricket as a sport on it's main webpage.
pretty sure the aussie government recognises bodybuilding as a sport through the ANBB which is a natural organisation.

the sports drug agency that does olympic athletes tests randomly and the results are on the government website.

i think these guys (the fed not the athletes) get some governement funding too but not sure...any auusies know?
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: pumpster on March 04, 2006, 06:45:02 PM
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (March 4) - A game of cricket is good for U.S.-Pakistani relations, but that's about as far as it goes. President Bush says baseball is where his heart is.

After a day of meetings, Bush rolled up his shirt sleeves Saturday afternoon and headed out to the lawn of the U.S. Embassy to play the baseball-like sport with Pakistani students.

He took his turn at bat after a few pointers from Shahryar Khan, chairman of Pakistan's Cricket Board, and Inzamam-ul-Haq, captain of Pakistan's Cricket Team.

Bush took three practice swings with the bat, which is flat on one side and humped on the other. He pretended to knock dirt from his shoes like a baseball player stepping up to the plate, then strode up to the wickets for a few swings.

The president connected with the first pitch, was hit in the shoulder by the second one, and sent a third ball sailing into a tree.

"Put something on that thing," Bush called out to the bowler, the equivalent of a pitcher in baseball. "Do I have my elbow right?"

Asked whether he liked this country's national pastime better than America's, the former owner of the Texas Rangers baseball team paused and cocked his head before answering. "I haven't quite got the skills yet," he said.

"I'm a big baseball fan," said Bush, who brought autographed baseballs for each of the students from the Islamabad College for Boys Cricket Clinic.

Last April, cricket played a central role as India and Pakistan tried to resolve their long-running dispute over Kashmir. Talks between Musharraf and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh were squeezed around a Sunday cricket match in New Delhi between the two countries.

Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Earl1972 on March 04, 2006, 10:03:58 PM
Give me one source where the judges said Ronnie won the 2001 Olympia due to his superior posing and not his superior physique.
Just because flexing onstage requires physical exertion does not mean they are judged on flexing. They aren't. They are judged on looks.
Yahoo simply made a mistake of classifying bodybuilding as a "Sport" opposed to a "hobby"

um maybe the fact that ronnie was behind before the posing rounds and passed him after the posing rounds ::)

again Paul Dillet

yeah yahoo made a mistake keep telling yourself that ::)

E
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ANAL DISCHARGE on March 05, 2006, 10:14:43 AM
No offense of course  ;D but if the Pakis can be world champs is it a serious sport?

That's a fair point considering Pakistan's not even a real country - just a filthy backwater of Islamic scum and mutilation.  Nevertheless, cricket is a great game usually played in glorious waether with a fantastic crowd atmosphere.  Don't knock it until you understand it.  As bodybuilding fans we are the last people in the world who can knock any sport with a straight face.   Although I was seeing some of that curling bullshit during the Olympics and wondered what kind of drugs the TV execs were on to actually show it.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: pumpster on March 05, 2006, 10:24:35 AM
It's truly silly to criticize curling while saying that cricket's somehow better.

I lived in the west indies and am entirely familiar with just how boring it is! Now of course cricket fanatics will say otherwise, then again there are many from the same countries that think 0-0 scores in soccer games decided by silly penalty kicks are high drama.  ::)

Paint drying tops most of the commonwealth's outdoor sports. Cricket's pacing and suspension of the time factor is so 1780's give or take a century of two. ;D
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ToxicAvenger on March 05, 2006, 12:21:55 PM
Toxic… I honestly have never seen a game. We finance municipal projects such as energy projects, communications, Airports etc. The Airport project in Antigua has been presented to us for financing. Parliament has not yet approved the entire project yet but the purpose of the renovation in to host the World Cup. My research included reading about Antigua and its passion for cricket.


ESPN legends of cricket..
imran khan...the michael jordan of cricket NOT waugh mind you..or even mike gatting mind you..or even Sir Malcom marshall..
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7353394606709271874&q=cricket
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: jwb on March 05, 2006, 03:18:54 PM
ESPN legends of cricket..
imran khan...the michael jordan of cricket NOT waugh mind you..or even mike gatting mind you..or even Sir Malcom marshall..
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7353394606709271874&q=cricket
Toxic you're smoking crack if you think Imran was a better player than steve waugh. Don't even talk about mike gatting...

Waugh could bat with the best, was a supreme fielder and wasn't a bad bowler in the right situation either.

He led by example the best team in the modern game...
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 05, 2006, 03:28:03 PM
um maybe the fact that ronnie was behind before the posing rounds and passed him after the posing rounds ::)
again Paul Dillet
yeah yahoo made a mistake keep telling yourself that ::)
E


Provide a source then. A source that ronnie won due to the posing round.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ToxicAvenger on March 05, 2006, 03:53:11 PM
Toxic you're smoking crack if you think Imran was a better player than steve waugh. Don't even talk about mike gatting...
Waugh could bat with the best, was a supreme fielder and wasn't a bad bowler in the right situation either.
He led by example the best team in the modern game...

so ESPN made a doc about waugh?
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Earl1972 on March 05, 2006, 09:16:54 PM
Provide a source then. A source that ronnie won due to the posing round.

you must be a newbie to the sport because it is common knowledge that Ronnie overtook jay in the posing rounds

scroll down to the 2001 O

http://www.getbig.com/results/e-mroly.htm

now bow to your master >:(

E
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 06, 2006, 06:46:05 AM
you must be a newbie to the sport because it is common knowledge that Ronnie overtook jay in the posing rounds
scroll down to the 2001 O
http://www.getbig.com/results/e-mroly.htm
now bow to your master >:(
E
what sport

it's a beauty pagent for muscles
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 06, 2006, 10:03:23 AM
you must be a newbie to the sport because it is common knowledge that Ronnie overtook jay in the posing rounds
scroll down to the 2001 O
http://www.getbig.com/results/e-mroly.htm
now bow to your master >:(
E


You really are a moron....There was no challenge round until 2005. In 2001 they weren't judged on posing. At all.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Earl1972 on March 06, 2006, 11:04:43 AM
You really are a moron....There was no challenge round until 2005. In 2001 they weren't judged on posing. At all.

reads the scores you retarded disgusting little shit beetle

the last two rounds are the posing rounds, Ronnie was behind in both of them and over took Jay by outposing him

obviously you're a 12 year old kid that just started following bodybuilding yesterday and you think you know it all ::)

E
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: The Showstoppa on March 06, 2006, 11:13:57 AM
reads the scores you retarded disgusting little shit beetle
the last two rounds are the posing rounds, Ronnie was behind in both of them and over took Jay by outposing him
obviously you're a 12 year old kid that just started following bodybuilding yesterday and you think you know it all ::)
E

Yes, and he's an atheist. Says so right in his avatar.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 06, 2006, 11:52:34 AM
reads the scores you retarded disgusting little shit beetle
the last two rounds are the posing rounds, Ronnie was behind in both of them and over took Jay by outposing him
obviously you're a 12 year old kid that just started following bodybuilding yesterday and you think you know it all ::)
E


Calm down...Take a deep breath...And shut the hell up.

They were not judged on posing but on looks. That's why they added the "posing challenge round" in the 05 olympia...To put more emphasis on posing.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ARMZ on March 06, 2006, 02:21:08 PM
Now that there is a challenge round, bodybuilding is now a sport, even to Mr. Webster's.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 06, 2006, 02:38:43 PM
Now that there is a challenge round, bodybuilding is now a sport, even to Mr. Webster's.


Not really,The judges will never judge them on that anyway.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ToxicAvenger on March 06, 2006, 07:52:55 PM
http://xtramsn.co.nz/news/0,,11965-5481190-300,00.html
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 06, 2006, 08:16:41 PM
http://xtramsn.co.nz/news/0,,11965-5481190-300,00.html
lol  nice
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Earl1972 on March 07, 2006, 09:39:09 AM
Calm down...Take a deep breath...And shut the hell up.
They were not judged on posing but on looks. That's why they added the "posing challenge round" in the 05 olympia...To put more emphasis on posing.

even if that were the case that proves it's a sport even more ::)

in this link our very own shawn admits that the posing round decided the winner

http://www.getbig.com/pics/olympia/2001/olympiareport04.htm

ronnie put on an excellent routine and jay's was boring

E
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 07, 2006, 03:08:37 PM
even if that were the case that proves it's a sport even more ::)

in this link our very own shawn admits that the posing round decided the winner

http://www.getbig.com/pics/olympia/2001/olympiareport04.htm

ronnie put on an excellent routine and jay's was boring

E


Bzzt,Wrong again. You don't keep up with the news do you? The judges ignored the challenge round and most pro's didn't even do it. It was "Optional". They were not judged on it.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Earl1972 on March 07, 2006, 04:21:22 PM

Bzzt,Wrong again. You don't keep up with the news do you? The judges ignored the challenge round and most pro's didn't even do it. It was "Optional". They were not judged on it.

I never said the challenge round meant anything obviously it didn't seeing as how gustavo won it and got 3rd in the contest

the the top 6 did it to win 50000

the posing routines and final posedown obviously mean something because Ronnie overtook jay after jay beat him in muscularity and symmetry

E
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Johnny Apollo on March 07, 2006, 04:24:01 PM
I never said the challenge round meant anything obviously it didn't seeing as how gustavo won it and got 3rd in the contest

the the top 6 did it to win 50000

the posing routines and final posedown obviously mean something because Ronnie overtook jay after jay beat him in muscularity and symmetry

E


The "Final posedown" isn't judged in posing ability but on appearance. MEANING it can't be called a sport since they aren't physicall competing against eachother but competing against eachother with appearance which isn't a physical competition.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 07, 2006, 04:27:40 PM
i like that... ;)


my appearance beats your appearance  :P

what a fight
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: ARMZ on March 07, 2006, 06:11:07 PM

Bzzt,Wrong again. You don't keep up with the news do you? The judges ignored the challenge round and most pro's didn't even do it. It was "Optional". They were not judged on it.



In 2004, Dex went from 3rd to 4th because of the challenge round, so don't ask Dex if that round mattered..
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Earl1972 on March 07, 2006, 09:08:35 PM

The "Final posedown" isn't judged in posing ability but on appearance. MEANING it can't be called a sport since they aren't physicall competing against eachother but competing against eachother with appearance which isn't a physical competition.

yes but the 3rd round is judged on posing

it has been proven numerous times that bodybuilders place higher with better routines and no I'm not talking about routines where they come out and dance and "entertain"

ronnie didn't all of a sudden have better muscularity and symmetry than jay a few hours later

it was close but since ronnie posed better he got the win

E

Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: The Body Farm on March 07, 2006, 10:30:02 PM
Jacking off is a sport.  Should be in the Olympics.
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: Earl1972 on March 08, 2006, 10:58:03 AM
Jacking off is a sport.  Should be in the Olympics.

very original ::)

it has to be competitive and rubbing one out can't be compared to the physical exertion that it takes to flex every muscle simultaneously for long periods of time

hope that helps

E
Title: Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
Post by: The Body Farm on March 08, 2006, 05:12:58 PM
Ok, shoot for distance.  Just stay away from Peter North.