Author Topic: cricket vs probodybuilding  (Read 20101 times)

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #50 on: March 04, 2006, 12:39:00 PM »
the ashes and much mroe inside here..esp at the bottom of the page..where there is a link of shoaib getting lara in the face!
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=57826.0

masterclass fielding...

watch this before you knock cricket

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7341309384834537116&q=cricket
carpe` vaginum!

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #51 on: March 04, 2006, 12:40:15 PM »
No offense of course  ;D but if the Pakis can be world champs is it a serious sport?

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #52 on: March 04, 2006, 12:41:18 PM »
No offense of course  ;D but if the Pakis can be world champs is it a serious sport?
\
you tell me
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8452989030204036720&q=shoaib+akthar


 ;)

now thats fast!
carpe` vaginum!

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #53 on: March 04, 2006, 12:41:41 PM »
judging on looks is a sport    LOL

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #54 on: March 04, 2006, 12:43:10 PM »
Those cricket balls are as hard as a rock; Cricket should come in to the 21st century with some better protective gear.

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #55 on: March 04, 2006, 12:44:54 PM »
Those cricket balls are as hard as a rock; Cricket should come in to the 21st century with some better protective gear.

they have

but a ball moving one way before bouncing and then moving another after the bounce coming is still unplayable..

here is a short video on fast bowling...see some smazing stuff in here

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4410213710170264644&q=cricket
carpe` vaginum!

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #56 on: March 04, 2006, 12:48:53 PM »
carpe` vaginum!

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #57 on: March 04, 2006, 12:50:24 PM »
strong balls are important in sports

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #58 on: March 04, 2006, 12:53:42 PM »
Basically they should be wearing football helmets.

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #59 on: March 04, 2006, 01:14:15 PM »
Basically they should be wearing football helmets.

that'll never happen in cricket..it goes against tradation...
carpe` vaginum!

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #60 on: March 04, 2006, 01:30:48 PM »
Antigua is investing $400 Million on improving their Airport to host the 2007 Cricket World Cup. I think that speaks volumes on the popularity of cricket verses bodybuilding.
 

max..i didn't know you were a cricketer...where ya from?
carpe` vaginum!

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5810
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #61 on: March 04, 2006, 02:09:50 PM »
Pumpster,

it can be VERY taxing.

A good batsman may bat continously for 2 days straight without a break if he is very good.

Same with a good fast bowler if his team is weak or they have injuries he may bowl for most of the game.

Of course when one team is batting only 2 of their players are on the field at one time.

A good batsman might field for 2 days then bat for two days straight though...

Johnny Apollo

  • Guest
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #62 on: March 04, 2006, 02:26:33 PM »
flexing every muscle simultaneously is physical exertion just ask Arnold
just ask anybody who has competed IN A MEANINGFUL SHOW posing onstage is a workout in itself
posing well takes skill it is common knowledge paul dillet would have placed higher if he knew how to pose
ronnie outposed jay to win the 01 Olympia
many bodybuilders have placed higher because they did well in the posing round
proves it's a sport
also none of what you said changes the fact that Yahoo and those other two sites list it as a sport
"but i don't see it on ESPN"
SHUTUP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
E


Give me one source where the judges said Ronnie won the 2001 Olympia due to his superior posing and not his superior physique.


Just because flexing onstage requires physical exertion does not mean they are judged on flexing. They aren't. They are judged on looks.

Yahoo simply made a mistake of classifying bodybuilding as a "Sport" opposed to a "hobby"

Max_Rep

  • Max Rep
  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3980
  • It’s about how hard you can GET hit...
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #63 on: March 04, 2006, 04:58:18 PM »
max..i didn't know you were a cricketer...where ya from?
Toxic… I honestly have never seen a game. We finance municipal projects such as energy projects, communications, Airports etc. The Airport project in Antigua has been presented to us for financing. Parliament has not yet approved the entire project yet but the purpose of the renovation in to host the World Cup. My research included reading about Antigua and its passion for cricket.
and keep moving!

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #64 on: March 04, 2006, 05:01:56 PM »
Toxic… I honestly have never seen a game. We finance municipal projects such as energy projects, communications, Airports etc. The Airport project in Antigua has been presented to us for financing. Parliament has not yet approved the entire project yet but the purpose of the renovation in to host the World Cup. My research included reading about Antigua and its passion for cricket.

um i have been following the sport of cricket for a long time
and the bodybuilding beauty shows for almost as long

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #65 on: March 04, 2006, 05:18:49 PM »
Give me one source where the judges said Ronnie won the 2001 Olympia due to his superior posing and not his superior physique.
Just because flexing onstage requires physical exertion does not mean they are judged on flexing. They aren't. They are judged on looks.
Yahoo simply made a mistake of classifying bodybuilding as a "Sport" opposed to a "hobby"

yahoo DOESNT recognize bodybuilding as a pro-sport on it's main webpage.  that is the purpose of this thread.  yahoo recognizes cricket as a sport on it's main webpage.

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5810
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #66 on: March 04, 2006, 05:30:13 PM »
yahoo DOESNT recognize bodybuilding as a pro-sport on it's main webpage.  that is the purpose of this thread.  yahoo recognizes cricket as a sport on it's main webpage.
pretty sure the aussie government recognises bodybuilding as a sport through the ANBB which is a natural organisation.

the sports drug agency that does olympic athletes tests randomly and the results are on the government website.

i think these guys (the fed not the athletes) get some governement funding too but not sure...any auusies know?

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #67 on: March 04, 2006, 06:45:02 PM »
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan (March 4) - A game of cricket is good for U.S.-Pakistani relations, but that's about as far as it goes. President Bush says baseball is where his heart is.

After a day of meetings, Bush rolled up his shirt sleeves Saturday afternoon and headed out to the lawn of the U.S. Embassy to play the baseball-like sport with Pakistani students.

He took his turn at bat after a few pointers from Shahryar Khan, chairman of Pakistan's Cricket Board, and Inzamam-ul-Haq, captain of Pakistan's Cricket Team.

Bush took three practice swings with the bat, which is flat on one side and humped on the other. He pretended to knock dirt from his shoes like a baseball player stepping up to the plate, then strode up to the wickets for a few swings.

The president connected with the first pitch, was hit in the shoulder by the second one, and sent a third ball sailing into a tree.

"Put something on that thing," Bush called out to the bowler, the equivalent of a pitcher in baseball. "Do I have my elbow right?"

Asked whether he liked this country's national pastime better than America's, the former owner of the Texas Rangers baseball team paused and cocked his head before answering. "I haven't quite got the skills yet," he said.

"I'm a big baseball fan," said Bush, who brought autographed baseballs for each of the students from the Islamabad College for Boys Cricket Clinic.

Last April, cricket played a central role as India and Pakistan tried to resolve their long-running dispute over Kashmir. Talks between Musharraf and Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh were squeezed around a Sunday cricket match in New Delhi between the two countries.


Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22153
  • #EarlToo
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #68 on: March 04, 2006, 10:03:58 PM »
Give me one source where the judges said Ronnie won the 2001 Olympia due to his superior posing and not his superior physique.
Just because flexing onstage requires physical exertion does not mean they are judged on flexing. They aren't. They are judged on looks.
Yahoo simply made a mistake of classifying bodybuilding as a "Sport" opposed to a "hobby"

um maybe the fact that ronnie was behind before the posing rounds and passed him after the posing rounds ::)

again Paul Dillet

yeah yahoo made a mistake keep telling yourself that ::)

E
E

ANAL DISCHARGE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1126
  • Getbig!
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #69 on: March 05, 2006, 10:14:43 AM »
No offense of course  ;D but if the Pakis can be world champs is it a serious sport?

That's a fair point considering Pakistan's not even a real country - just a filthy backwater of Islamic scum and mutilation.  Nevertheless, cricket is a great game usually played in glorious waether with a fantastic crowd atmosphere.  Don't knock it until you understand it.  As bodybuilding fans we are the last people in the world who can knock any sport with a straight face.   Although I was seeing some of that curling bullshit during the Olympics and wondered what kind of drugs the TV execs were on to actually show it.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #70 on: March 05, 2006, 10:24:35 AM »
It's truly silly to criticize curling while saying that cricket's somehow better.

I lived in the west indies and am entirely familiar with just how boring it is! Now of course cricket fanatics will say otherwise, then again there are many from the same countries that think 0-0 scores in soccer games decided by silly penalty kicks are high drama.  ::)

Paint drying tops most of the commonwealth's outdoor sports. Cricket's pacing and suspension of the time factor is so 1780's give or take a century of two. ;D

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #71 on: March 05, 2006, 12:21:55 PM »
Toxic… I honestly have never seen a game. We finance municipal projects such as energy projects, communications, Airports etc. The Airport project in Antigua has been presented to us for financing. Parliament has not yet approved the entire project yet but the purpose of the renovation in to host the World Cup. My research included reading about Antigua and its passion for cricket.


ESPN legends of cricket..
imran khan...the michael jordan of cricket NOT waugh mind you..or even mike gatting mind you..or even Sir Malcom marshall..
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7353394606709271874&q=cricket
carpe` vaginum!

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5810
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #72 on: March 05, 2006, 03:18:54 PM »
ESPN legends of cricket..
imran khan...the michael jordan of cricket NOT waugh mind you..or even mike gatting mind you..or even Sir Malcom marshall..
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7353394606709271874&q=cricket
Toxic you're smoking crack if you think Imran was a better player than steve waugh. Don't even talk about mike gatting...

Waugh could bat with the best, was a supreme fielder and wasn't a bad bowler in the right situation either.

He led by example the best team in the modern game...

Johnny Apollo

  • Guest
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #73 on: March 05, 2006, 03:28:03 PM »
um maybe the fact that ronnie was behind before the posing rounds and passed him after the posing rounds ::)
again Paul Dillet
yeah yahoo made a mistake keep telling yourself that ::)
E


Provide a source then. A source that ronnie won due to the posing round.

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: cricket vs probodybuilding
« Reply #74 on: March 05, 2006, 03:53:11 PM »
Toxic you're smoking crack if you think Imran was a better player than steve waugh. Don't even talk about mike gatting...
Waugh could bat with the best, was a supreme fielder and wasn't a bad bowler in the right situation either.
He led by example the best team in the modern game...

so ESPN made a doc about waugh?
carpe` vaginum!