Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: IFBBwannaB on May 21, 2006, 09:46:50 PM

Title: Heath width wont be a prob!
Post by: IFBBwannaB on May 21, 2006, 09:46:50 PM: Everyone yaps about how Heath shoulder width will kill his progress,but you forget that Levorne,Flex and Coleman all have pretty narrow skeletons too.

But thats actualy an advanages since he will pack more muscles and look great just like they all did.

He aint an Olympia threat now,but I belive that next year he might be top5.
If he adds 15lbs and comes sharp he can switch Dex place! :o

Watch out ,TEAM HEATH!
Title: Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
Post by: 240 is Back on May 21, 2006, 09:54:31 PM: Quote from: IFBBwannaB on May 21, 2006, 09:46:50 PM
Everyone yaps about how Heath shoulder width will kill his progress,but you forget that Levorne,Flex and Coleman all have pretty narrow skeletons too.

Someone post a pic of coleman and heath side by side. I would content that especially based upon his early 98 pics, Coleman had some very wide shoulders
Title: Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
Post by: LuciusFox on May 21, 2006, 09:57:18 PM: Actually, Coleman isn't that wide in the shoulders. Post a relaxed pic or a picture next to Cutler to see what I mean.
Title: Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
Post by: Al-Gebra on May 21, 2006, 10:05:15 PM: Quote from: LuciusFox on May 21, 2006, 09:57:18 PM
Actually, Coleman isn't that wide in the shoulders. Post a relaxed pic or a picture next to Cutler to see what I mean.

you're right, foxy brown.
Title: Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
Post by: LuciusFox on May 21, 2006, 10:06:06 PM: Quote from: Al-Gebra on May 21, 2006, 10:05:15 PM
you're right, foxy brown.

As usual? :D
Title: Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
Post by: IFBBwannaB on May 22, 2006, 07:37:03 AM: Look at the pictures I posted in the thread about Coleman wasp waist.His SKELETON is narrow.

Now he is wide because he got TONS of muscle on it...thats my point..Heath will gain more muslce and will look great.

Some of you are seriously stupid,muscles and bones arent the same thing.
Go back to bio class.
Title: Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
Post by: ironneck on May 22, 2006, 07:49:24 AM: antagonists are cool
Title: Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
Post by: 240 is Back on May 22, 2006, 07:50:43 AM: Quote from: IFBBwannaB on May 22, 2006, 07:37:03 AM
Now he is wide because he got TONS of muscle on it...thats my point..Heath will gain more muslce and will look great.

No, heath cannot become WIDER as Coleman is. Heath can gain chest muscle, but it'll just get more and more bunched up. Coleman has a wider structure, and if you can't see that, you're blind.
Title: Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
Post by: Jerryme7 on May 22, 2006, 07:57:21 AM: 240, remember the "Old" Coleman? How small and narrow he was?

Dont you think Phil can also do what Coleman has done? I believe he can....
Title: Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
Post by: IFBBwannaB on May 22, 2006, 09:23:27 AM: Quote from: MindSpin on May 22, 2006, 08:12:45 AM
The last thing he needs to do is put on more size ::) He needs to thicken his back and strive to some in sharper and desner with each outing. If he plays the size game, he'll just trun into another gut-monster...

Yeah you are right..he need to thicken his back without gaining weight...and how will he do that? Simple physics man...

Most BB have narrow structures that what make them look freaky most times.Thats why some need to be 260+ to look that good.Cutler for example have a large structure and thats why he never looked good when he was under ~250.

God for people who spend all their time here you are pretty clueless.