« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Heath width wont be a prob!  (Read 2183 times)

IFBBwannaB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
  • BAN stick!
Heath width wont be a prob!
« on: May 21, 2006, 09:46:50 PM »
Everyone yaps about how Heath shoulder width will kill his progress,but you forget that Levorne,Flex and Coleman all have pretty narrow skeletons too.

But thats actualy an advanages since he will pack more muscles and look great just like they all did.

He aint an Olympia threat now,but I belive that next year he might be top5.
If he adds 15lbs and comes sharp he can switch Dex place!  :o

Watch out ,TEAM HEATH!
Logged

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2006, 09:54:31 PM »
Quote from: IFBBwannaB on May 21, 2006, 09:46:50 PM
Everyone yaps about how Heath shoulder width will kill his progress,but you forget that Levorne,Flex and Coleman all have pretty narrow skeletons too.

Someone post a pic of coleman and heath side by side.  I would content that especially based upon his early 98 pics, Coleman had some very wide shoulders
Logged

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2006, 09:57:18 PM »
 Actually, Coleman isn't that wide in the shoulders. Post a relaxed pic or a picture next to Cutler to see what I mean.
Logged

Al-Gebra

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5927
Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2006, 10:05:15 PM »
Quote from: LuciusFox on May 21, 2006, 09:57:18 PM
Actually, Coleman isn't that wide in the shoulders. Post a relaxed pic or a picture next to Cutler to see what I mean.

you're right, foxy brown.
Logged

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2006, 10:06:06 PM »
Quote from: Al-Gebra on May 21, 2006, 10:05:15 PM
you're right, foxy brown.

  As usual?  :D
Logged

IFBBwannaB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
  • BAN stick!
Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
« Reply #5 on: May 22, 2006, 07:37:03 AM »
Look at the pictures I posted in the thread about Coleman wasp waist.His SKELETON is narrow.

Now he is wide because he got TONS of muscle on it...thats my point..Heath will gain more muslce and will look great.

Some of you are seriously stupid,muscles and bones arent the same thing.
Go back to bio class.
Logged

ironneck

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14419
  • team young getbiggers
Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
« Reply #6 on: May 22, 2006, 07:49:24 AM »
antagonists are cool
Logged

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
« Reply #7 on: May 22, 2006, 07:50:43 AM »
Quote from: IFBBwannaB on May 22, 2006, 07:37:03 AM
Now he is wide because he got TONS of muscle on it...thats my point..Heath will gain more muslce and will look great.

No, heath cannot become WIDER as Coleman is.  Heath can gain chest muscle, but it'll just get more and more bunched up.  Coleman has a wider structure, and if you can't see that, you're blind.
Logged

Jerryme7

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1534
  • Check out www.muscleshoppe.com for the best prices
Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
« Reply #8 on: May 22, 2006, 07:57:21 AM »
240, remember the "Old" Coleman? How small and narrow he was?

Dont you think Phil can also do what Coleman has done? I believe he can....

 
Logged

IFBBwannaB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
  • BAN stick!
Re: Heath width wont be a prob!
« Reply #9 on: May 22, 2006, 09:23:27 AM »
Quote from: MindSpin on May 22, 2006, 08:12:45 AM
The last thing he needs to do is put on more size ::)  He needs to thicken his back and strive to some in sharper and desner with each outing.  If he plays the size game, he'll just trun into another gut-monster...


Yeah you are right..he need to thicken his back without gaining weight...and how will he do that? Simple physics man...

Most BB have narrow structures that what make them look freaky most times.Thats why some need to be 260+ to look that good.Cutler for example have a large structure and thats why he never looked good when he was under ~250.

God for people who spend all their time here you are pretty clueless.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »