Recent Posts

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10
11
Freakin' Jew Neocons Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan laughing at what a fuckup this is and how this is Israel's war. Unbelievable. War hawk John Bolton is also saying the US wasn't prepared.

https://x.com/MaxBlumenthal/status/2033537235505623190

Jews and a few goy Zionists are saying this Joe Kent is an extreme right winger neo-Nazi, holocaust denier with a "Panzer" tattoo. At the same time they say he's a liberal democrat LOL. No one who follows this cares whether Joe had intelligence access wrt Iran these past few months, it's easy enough to deduce what role Israel  played. I had no idea about this guy and I haven't looked into him but it's notable due to his position and that he said it, not what he was privy to exactly.

There's been a campaign to influence Trump against Iran. Israel and the FBI manufactured a fake Iranian assassination plot against him. "You got them before they got you Mr Trump!"

https://www.unz.com/article/how-israel-and-the-fbi-manipulated-assassination-plots-to-goad-trump-into-iran-war/

No one serious thought or thinks this. The whole point of nukes is that you don't use them, they are deterrents. Mersheimer calls them weapons of peace. Iran had 60% material for a long time, which they produced as a bargaining chip, and if they had wanted to they would have produced and used a nuke a long time ago. It would have taken only a few weeks to make a few. But it's suicide and even if they are religious extremists Islam doesn't quite call for collective suicide, even if they don't think Israel should exist. In fact they said their religion doesn't allow for nukes and the Ayatollah placed that prohibition on them. Now who knows what the new leaders decide.

It's unclear if Trump is stupid enough to actually believe what he says in this first attachment ??? Look at the second pic, Trump was winning so much he decided to make "a little excursion to Iran" LMAO. I mean lots of people have been killed so it's not really a laughing matter unless you're a psychopath but Trump delivers on the absurdity on the daily :D

First off. I don’t read most of your bullshit because you use sources like “Max Blumenthal” who gets paid for his anti-Trump anti-American rhetoric. 90% of the sources you use such as him and Haaretz just as examples. Now, let’s get on your “no one serious thinks like this” wrong. Everyone with a defensive mindset thinks like this wether in war, In law enforcement or even in a street fight. It’s the equivalent of “don’t shoot until you’re shot upon”. It’s retarded thinking


For the record, that was literally Obama’s orders. Don’t shoot until you’re shot at.
Like most liberals, I don’t think you have the ability of common sense and/or logic

If I’m on the street and I get confronted with a person with a gun, am I going to until the muzzle is in my face or am I Ami taking a shot before?
12
Libs of TikTok
@libsoftiktok

BREAKING: William Kelso Flournoy, a man pretending to be a woman, was arrested in WA state after he allegedly R*PED an infant girl.

Why does this keep on happening?!



https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2033954298082558239
13
Gossip & Opinions / Re: What's Your Go To Hotel?
« Last post by IroNat on Today at 05:14:19 PM »
I've stayed in some crappy hotels/motels.

Today's big chain franchise hotels are good when new but after a few years they stop maintaining them and milk them.

Then they are sold to someone named Patel.

Not all of course.  Courtyard by Marriot are consistently good.

Hotels have gotten quite expensive.
14
Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: The 2026 Midterm Election
« Last post by Dos Equis on Today at 05:07:13 PM »
She won't be going away. Will probably get a gig on MSNOW.

True.  I meant going away from public office. 
15
Lincoln looks ashamed. ;D

Hahahaha!!  I missed that.   ;D
16
Gossip & Opinions / Re: What's Your Go To Hotel?
« Last post by joswift on Today at 05:05:43 PM »
The Mirage..
17
Gossip & Opinions / Re: What's Your Go To Hotel?
« Last post by AbrahamG on Today at 04:59:33 PM »
Ritz or something better.

You're Motel 6 material.  Fuckface. 
18
Politics and Political Issues Board / Re: Worst Ever
« Last post by AbrahamG on Today at 04:58:18 PM »
Absolutely believable.  ::) You're right up there with Primecocksucker, toilet cleaner.

Of course it's believable.  To a retard like yourself. 
19
This article from last year quotes an anonymous Trump official
Immediately disregarded as bullshit.
20
Whose word?

This article from last year quotes an anonymous Trump official and the author is a "leftist" so it's probably worthless to you, but I think it's easy enough to believe considering Tulsi releasing that video last year before the Iran strikes and Trump saying he doesn't care about her opinions.

Quote
The Trump official told The Grayzone that Wiles has excluded Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, from crucial meetings where US intervention in Iran was discussed. That included a June 8 meeting at Camp David where Ratcliffe used a clumsy sports metaphor to insist that Iran was just days away from producing a nuclear weapon: “It’s like saying a football team marched 99 yards down the field, got to the one yard line and, oh, they don’t have the intention to score,” he argued to Trump.

Two days later, Gabbard released a social media video invoking the American military’s destruction of the Japanese city of Hiroshima with a nuclear bomb in 1945, and warned that a similar horror could soon unfold because “political elite warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers.”

Trump was reportedly infuriated by her comments. Asked by a reporter about Gabbard’s testimony this March that Iran had not restarted its nuclear weapons program, Trump grumbled, “I don’t care what she said,” then echoed Ratcliffe’s view – and by extension, that of the Israelis: “I think they were very close to having [a nuclear weapon].”

This may explain why Gabbard released a June 20 statement on Twitter/X insisting that her views on Iran’s nuclear enrichment were faithfully aligned with Trump’s, and had been distorted by a “dishonest media” seeking to “manufacture division.” Though the statement reaffirmed her commitment to President Trump, her assessment of Iran’s nuclear program did not differ from the evaluation she delivered in March, which determined Iran was not currently pursuing a nuclear bomb.

“America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months,” Gabbard claimed on Twitter/X, “if they decide to finalize the assembly.”

https://thegrayzone.com/2025/06/21/trump-cia-director-ratcliffe-and-centcoms-kurilla-mossad-stenographers-iran/

Tulsi's statement today can also be read a couple of different ways. It doesn't expressly say that she agreed with Trump's conclusion, just that her office provided intelligence. We have to draw our own conclusions.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 10