Recent Posts
Apparently, Stefon Diggs accuser, Mila (Jamila) Adams was not believable enough to be included under the "Believe all Women" tread title.Given that he's a democrat, your media won't run those stories 24/7 so no, they don't care.
Your nitpicking of legal terms aside, you are correct, he was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation because it was a civil and not a criminal trial. This was because the criminal statute of limitations had expired by the time the allegation was made public. Lucky for Trump.
Considering she had no evidence or eyewitnesses; she must have been extremely convincing about the sexual abuse since the jury believed her and ruled in her favor.
You fags quit arguing about shit not germane to this situation.Leave the Jacksons out of this.
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/fbi-chief-kash-patel-was-arrested-for-public-drinking-urination-report-11408730#:~:text=Read%20Time:%203%20mins,the%20FBI%20under%20Director%20Patel.%22There you go, more rancid trash being spewed from your shit filled mouth. It's obvious at this point that you are completely uneducated on American politics and are just here to swing off LurkingforBOYS nuts.
He was arrested two times for issues related to alcohol.
But sure, spin it how you want and pretend it never happened.
We all get arrested a few times while being drunk!! who doesn't? at 26 mind you lololololo a fucking grown man pissing in public probably showing his cock to youngins based on his defense of pedos
I just went to Dubai for 10 days.
It's crazy how nobody there seemed worried about the missile interceptions and drone attack theats.
You are correct, federal law supersedes conflicting state law.Should I write my governor a sternly worded letter and tell him about that?
I am saying the money raised by private entities is being used as a bribe to curry favors. I think thats fairly obvious is it not?Another lie. Why do liberal twinks lie so much?
There is zero evidence of that. It's like saying theft effects wal-marts ability to be profitable, it doesn't. Does it occur? sure it does. Should they issue sweeping changes that may or may not be effective? probably not.Where did I say it was one sided you fucking idiot? I said democrats are the only ones going to court to stop the investigations, you cum guzzling mongloid retard.
The fact that you think it's one sided is also hilarious, total partisan hack stuff.
Propose something thats not retarded and clearly not related to the belt to ass you are about to get and they would consider it.
Trump is out here doing everything he can to steal the election, saying you shouldn't have one, asking for seats, gerrymandering, trying to stop mail in voting, sowing distrust.
Meanwhile in reality he literally tried to usurp the election and in 60 cases was found to have zero evidence. How did that dominion case work out?
release the kraken!!! morons
I see sarcasm is lost on you.It's not me, it's you.
