21
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Bhank: Latest news and misadventures
« Last post by wes on Today at 01:39:02 PM »Black Bile Of Peace 


Haha, I'm a fan of you really, you pillow-fisted oaf. Slava Bohu!
-Casserole




Knowing that I could have my head cut off post-cum is very arousing
Yes Definitely only after she got her Tig Ole Bitties out
& swallowed my load.
Kid must have gotten mouthy.
Let's think about this.
1) Claimed height: 6'2".
2) Claimed weight 230-240 pounds.
3) Claimed arm size: 22".
4) Claimed chest size: 57" (!!!)
Compare vs. Ronnie Coleman.
1) 5'11"
2) ~280+ pounds
3) 21.5" arm.
4) 57.4" chest.
If Arnold's telling the truth about his chest, arm, and leg measurements, he'd need to be actually heavier than Ronnie -- because Ronnie has approximately the same measurements at a 3" height disadvantage. Rule of thumb is that 1" of height adds 7-10 pounds. So Arnold would need to be about 300-310 pounds, minimally.
The guys you flagged as being "similar to Arnold" in height and weight -- de May and Reg Park -- are nowhere close to those measurements. Reg Park's arm measurement is usually given as 18.5" to 19"!
So those "measurements" are lies, pure and simple. Seriously, the notion that his chest ever measured 57" is a howler to anybody who has any idea what average bodybuilder chest circumference measurements look like. In reality, if he was say around 240 pounds, it's most likely that his chest was 52" max, with a pump, and his arm was ~19.5 - 20". The latter is indeed what Arthur Jones measured: http://www.arthurjonesexercise.com/Bulletin2/36.PDF
The difference between a 20" arm and a 22" arm is like night and day.
And a 52" chest is very good for a high-level modern bodybuilder, whereas 57" is basically Ronnie Coleman tier, which only a small handful of post 1990s mass monsters have ever achieved. (And always at bodyweights approaching or exceeding 300 pounds.) Even Dorian Yates never claimed a 57" chest circumference.
