Don't be so bitter about it, here's some red pill for you. You can not negotiate natural instincts, you can only act upon them. Nature doesn't give a sh't if a woman is a whore or a man abandons the family. As long as the children get the best genes, are healthy and safe everything from the evolutionary perspective is OK.
Looks and being an ''alpha'' in her eyes will get you validational sex( providing the best genes) while having just resources(satisfying the beta provider side of female hypergamy) gives you transactional sex. If you have both, you're a winner.
Women will always be turned on by good looking manly men ( no homo), even if these guys are garbage men. As long as they have game they can get sex from the hottest chicks anytime. Whether a female decides to do it, it's her reasonable decision. The urge is still there. You can not negotiate natural desire. Yes, money attracts women, but it doesn't arouse them. For that you still need some game and looks.
I also dont think your argument is correct.... I dont think the blacks are alpha or attractive to most white women, they are unstable. Instability is not something that attracts women...
The whole point evolutionarily of being attracted to strong males is protection but this is also offset by stability. A male must be strong but not overly aggressive to pose a threat to any children they may have and be stable enough to remain a functioning member of the tribe to provide for the offspring.
Black men generally can do none of these things, they are proven failures in all of the above.
And deep down everybody knows it, even liberals, difference is the liberals just blame whites for all failures of the blacks.