Kerry B. Mullis said on video these tests would absolutely not work correctly for testing for covid.
Arguing or trying to talk sense to someone vaccinated is like casting pearls before swine, not even sure why I am wasting my time posting this.
Soon enough they will beg to die when 6g/internet 3.0 takes over. Pray for them, seriously, the whole world has no clue about whats going to happen soon enough.
I am not interested in arguing with you about this so, would you please post a link to that video. I can't seem to find it. What I did find is a raft of articles claiming he never said it wouldn't work correctly for COVID. And what must be a different video interview with Mullis since it was made long before we anyone knew what COVID was.
Kerry B. Mullis died in August of 2019. The first known cases of people with symptoms of an atypical pneumonia-like illness were identified in Wuhan, China in December 2019. The WHO announced “COVID-19” as the name of this new disease on February 11, 2020. Dead people don't do interviews.
-Not sure why there is all this hoopla about the accuracy of PCR test. Not the PCR test, but the rapid antigen tests commonly produce false negatives and false positives—especially when a COVID-19 infection is still in its early stages—these issues are much
less likely to occur with PCR tests. All types of tests are rarely absolute. There is always a margin for error.
PCR tests don't cause COVID-19, one either has COVID or they don't when they are tested. COVID-19 treatment is based on a person’s symptoms. So once again, why all the fuss over the PCR tests?
Note: When COVID visited upon our household last February we each took the rapid antigen tests and not the PCR test. The primary reason we bothered to test, was to determine quarantine times.