It's interesting that you can already see "from a mile away" that no "high crimes and misdemeanors" have been committed. How could you possibly know that when there has been no congressional oversight. Perhaps you should contact the incoming congressional leaders and let them know that you've looked into all those things so they don't have to waste their time. I can't see how investigating the alleged massive corruption in government contracts for Iraq and also Katrina would be a waste of our tax dollars. We're talking about billions and billions of $'s that are unaccounted for and/or lost through fraud and corruption. How many of our tax dollars were wasted investigating whitewater, clintons hummer from monica, or even the Clintons alleged misuse of the whitehouse Christmas list. Those "investigations" were witchhunts that accomplished nothing. The stuff were talking about are actual crimes and worthy of investigation. Regardless of our opinions it appears that congress will start doing their job again soon and you may have a whole bunch of new facts to digest. I do think it's quite possible that they will discover many impeachable offenses but still choose not to impeach but either way, oversight is coming like it or not.
I was completely opposed to the Clinton witch hunt. A complete waste of my tax dollars. I thought the "impeachment" was a joke. A partisan vote on impeachment is never good for the country. And the underlying offense wasn't even a crime IMO. I was stunned that the Starr report (and I read the entire thing) never addressed the fact that Clinton's lie under oath was not about a material issue, and perjury is lying under oath about a material issue. But I'll get off that soap box . . . .
In a nutshell, here is why there will likely not be any "investigations" into the issues you raised:
warrentless wire taps (already admitted to but not yet fully investigated)I'm not sure the order to do warrentless wiretaps came from Bush, but even assuming it did, he relied on the advice of counsel, just his predecessors. No way he gets impeached over this.
pre-war intelligenceDemocrats do not want to go here, because they are knee deep in comments to the American people about what a threat Saddam posed. There is no logical way to separate Bush's stance on Saddam's threat before the war with the numerous Democrats who echoed Bush's comments. Not gonna happen.
war profiteering (think no-bid, cost plus contracts, graft, waste)Red herring. Bush isn't a party to the contracts with private companies. I doubt his name appears as a responsible party anywhere. These aren't government entities. Halliburton is a private company. Absolutely nothing to investigate regarding Bush here.
medicare legislationCongress is going to investigate whether Bush committed a crime by advocating and/or signing various pieces of legislation? I don't think so.
using us tax dollars to fund political activities (think faith based initiatives)This is a civil, not criminal matter. I'm sure if there was violation of tax laws, groups like Common Cause or Judicial Watch would have been all over it. Nothing there.
lot's of other stuff that we probably know nothing aboutThat would be part of the definition of witch hunt, I believe.