Author Topic: Holy shit! Did a missile hit WTC6? (Read 4003 times)

240 is Back · « **on:** February 18, 2007, 06:10:59 PM »

&mode=related&search=

240 is Back · « **Reply #1 on:** February 18, 2007, 06:17:51 PM »

&mode=related&search=

Wow.

240 is Back · « **Reply #2 on:** February 18, 2007, 06:20:56 PM »

what the hell does the camera catch here?

&mode=related&search=

Also, listen to the reporter talk about witnesses seeing missiles.

240 is Back · « **Reply #3 on:** February 18, 2007, 06:49:12 PM »

And before anyone labels my beliefs, I don't know what is on the screen here, nor have I researched it before. Whatever comes in, it is on a crash course for building 6 of the world trade complex.

And, here is what WTC6 looked like afterwards. Is that a missile impact crater in the middle?

240 is Back · « **Reply #4 on:** February 18, 2007, 06:50:30 PM »

FOX and drudge both covered it right after 9/11.

http://www.public-action.com/911/psyopnews/Extra/3/flash91.htm

240 is Back · « **Reply #5 on:** February 18, 2007, 06:54:33 PM »

Explosion at WTC Complex

Despite the fact that the horrible events of Sept. 11 occurred in broad daylight and were widely photographed, significant aspects of the attacks have been completely suppressed by a media blackout.

Exclusive to American Free Press
By Christopher Bollyn

A massive explosion, witnessed by millions of television viewers on CNN, evidently devastated World Trade Center 6, the eight-story U.S. Customs building, although no national newspaper, other than American Free Press, has written a word about it.

Before the smoke had cleared from around the stricken South Tower, a mysterious explosion shot 550 feet into the air above the U.S. Customs House at WTC 6.

The unexplained blast occurred between the burning North Tower and the 47-story Salomon Brothers Building, known as WTC 7, immediately after United Airlines Flight 175 smashed into the South Tower, at about 9:03 a.m.

The explosion at WTC 6 was shown afterward on CNN. But because it was not broadcast as it happened there has been some confusion about when it actually occurred.

The large amount of smoke seen cascading around the South Tower in the video led some observers to mistake the blast for a dust cloud from the subsequent collapse of the tower.

gtbro1 · « **Reply #6 on:** February 18, 2007, 07:02:26 PM »

240 = mysterious death /disappearance

kh300 · « **Reply #7 on:** February 18, 2007, 07:05:15 PM »

you win. it can be a missle a bomb or whatever you want it to be.

after 50,000 post youve made plus all of your gimmics, its obvious your a strange dude

post after post after post about 911- your a fucking mental patient

240 is Back · « **Reply #8 on:** February 18, 2007, 07:14:30 PM »

hey, it's a fascinating topic. biggest event of our lifetimes. history will reveal if i'm right or wrong. i might be wrong about everything, i dunno. and we all die eventually, gtbro. you have guys like alex jones doing this for 15 years. you have thousands of college professors and scientists calling for investigations, you have people suing and building legislation. we're just in the chitchat stage. another 5 or 10 years, people will use it to run for office and we'll enter the "action stage" where another investigation may start.

bmacsys · « **Reply #9 on:** February 19, 2007, 04:40:59 AM »

I don't think anybody on this board really cares about the 9/11 conspiracy theories anymore. Its ran its course. Time to move to something else.

240 is Back · « **Reply #10 on:** February 19, 2007, 05:26:50 AM »

Quote from: bmacsys on February 19, 2007, 04:40:59 AM

I don't think anybody on this board really cares about the 9/11 conspiracy theories anymore. Its ran its course. Time to move to something else.

so once a murder case is 5 years old, you don't care if people got away with it?

Hedgehog · « **Reply #11 on:** February 19, 2007, 05:57:15 AM »

240 or Bust, you got me all confused now,

I thought you have been arguing the case for bombs within the buildings?

You know, the kind that are used when taking down old buildings. I've seen lots of posts from you about how WTC could NOT have been brought down by an airplane, that everything from the way it went down has the tell-tale signs of an explosion far below?

Have you changed your mind?

-Hedge

240 is Back · « **Reply #12 on:** February 19, 2007, 06:20:01 AM »

airplane couldn't. just used as the visual that ppl blamed.

this looks* like a missile flying in just as plane 2 hits, striking building 6.

pumpster · « **Reply #13 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:03:25 AM »

You said you would stop the 9/11 threads, then more of same along with endless bumps in lieu of any other posts, just to make sure we see your screams for attention.

By chance were you near ground zero on 9/11 and did you in fact incur brain damage?

mightymouse72 · « **Reply #14 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:07:52 AM »

Quote from: kh300 on February 18, 2007, 07:05:15 PM

you win. it can be a missle a bomb or whatever you want it to be.

after 50,000 post youve made plus all of your gimmics, its obvious your a strange dude

post after post after post about 911- your a fucking mental patient

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

240 is Back · « **Reply #15 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:29:16 AM »

some of you sound like sad excuses for americans. we're talking video evidence and crater impact of a missile on american soil and you want to mock the guy who points it out.

240 is Back · « **Reply #16 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:34:39 AM »

right around 1:59...

this looks a lot like it would be a missile.

&mode=related&search=

240 is Back · « **Reply #17 on:** February 19, 2007, 07:38:53 AM »

Quote from: Hedgehog on February 19, 2007, 05:57:15 AM

240 or Bust, you got me all confused now,

I thought you have been arguing the case for bombs within the buildings?

You know, the kind that are used when taking down old buildings. I've seen lots of posts from you about how WTC could NOT have been brought down by an airplane, that everything from the way it went down has the tell-tale signs of an explosion far below?

Have you changed your mind?

-Hedge

to clarify- many believe the planes were used to hit the buildings and obviously take the blame. The explosives were used to bring them down. The firefighters in the south tower reported the fires were down to 2 small pockets, and a minute later we saw the building implode in mid air. That takes explosives.

This is a separate incident. A second after the second plane hits, someting flies into the screen and nails the spot where WTC building #6 is. This is supported by the crater in 6. It's not from the plane. It comes from well above and wouldn't have been seen if it hadn't clipped the building and broken up.

I have no clue what it is. FOX and drudge reported it after 9/11, as did other world media. then it never came up in the 911 report. the crater in WTC 6 is attributed to fire damage. who knows...

Nordic Superman · « **Reply #18 on:** February 19, 2007, 08:37:37 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on February 19, 2007, 07:29:16 AM

some of you sound like sad excuses for americans. we're talking video evidence and crater impact of a missile on american soil and you want to mock the guy who points it out.

There's no "missile crater" you unintelligent lunatic.

Like I said eons ago, you are mental.

youandme · « **Reply #19 on:** February 19, 2007, 09:21:22 AM »

Why do people want a political board blackout regarding the questioning the events of 911? This was a major moment in history, that totally changed everything for the entire world including our own freedoms.

240 is Back · « **Reply #20 on:** February 19, 2007, 10:17:39 AM »

Quote from: youandme on February 19, 2007, 09:21:22 AM

Why do people want a political board blackout regarding the questioning the events of 911? This was a major moment in history, that totally changed everything for the entire world including our own freedoms.

i dunno. and i'm not one of those guys who marches on the streets, demanding ann investigation (although those folks are out there). I just like to talk about it.

This thread for example - The theory: Is it possible that missile(s) were raining down from the sky? Did they use the planes hitting as timing to mask the noise and get most camera pointed elsewhere? The WTC6 missile was moving so fast that the only reason it even showed up on CNN's digital camera was because it clipped the North Tower and broke up as it was landing. How fast were the fckers going? Incredible.

I know that nobody will ever see jail. Most of the public key figures are old and will prob move to S. America if if ever gets tense here. Most people (like many here it seems) are okay with it. It's just a fascinating topic - the events of the day, the effects on history, and to observe the mindset of people who just don't care about missiles fired into american cities. Scary and intriguing at the same time!

Nordic Superman · « **Reply #21 on:** February 19, 2007, 10:36:01 AM »

240, you just can't grasp how far fetched and unrealistic your drivel really is.

Now you're coming up with elaborate schemes involving both planes masking missiles, whilst bombs destroy the foundations, all combined in an elaborate way of bringing down the towers.

Anyhow... I thought these planes were holograms?

240 is Back · « **Reply #22 on:** February 19, 2007, 10:37:59 AM »

nordic, you've marginalized yourself with the namecalling and insults without any substance.

you tell me - what the heck comes from the sky at 1:59 of that clip.

You tell us. Don't you dare shit on me until you answer the f'king question.

what came from the sky?

Nordic Superman · « **Reply #23 on:** February 19, 2007, 10:49:18 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on February 19, 2007, 10:37:59 AM

nordic, you've marginalized yourself with the namecalling and insults without any substance.

you tell me - what the heck comes from the sky at 1:59 of that clip.

You tell us. Don't you dare shit on me until you answer the f'king question.

what came from the sky?

Nose cone, office equipment, office debre etc... propelled by explotion.

Substance? Youtube is your only substance in any dicussion.

Cap · « **Reply #24 on:** February 19, 2007, 10:57:23 AM »

You act like explosions in a 110 story building is out of the question. You mean to tell me there is nothing flammable anywhere in there? You are clearly dumber than I thought. Jet fuel, fire, combustible material etc. Get a life. I beg you.