Author Topic: Which is more impressive to you? (Read 4471 times)

TheAnimal · « **Reply #1 on:** March 08, 2007, 10:10:33 PM »

personally Ron Coleman looks more impressive there

canadaphiliac · « **Reply #2 on:** March 08, 2007, 10:11:24 PM »

Impressive? Ronnie by a country mile. Better? Arnold from the waist up.

Alex23 · « **Reply #3 on:** March 08, 2007, 10:12:30 PM »

Arnold's successor

Mr. Intenseone · « **Reply #4 on:** March 08, 2007, 10:12:56 PM »

Arnold by a landslide!!

beatmaster · « **Reply #5 on:** March 08, 2007, 10:13:09 PM »

awwwwwwnold.......

tweeter · « **Reply #6 on:** March 09, 2007, 01:16:30 AM »

Arnold

kyomu · « **Reply #7 on:** March 09, 2007, 01:27:16 AM »

Those brains of people saying arnold is totaly fvcked up.
We are not talkin about who is great. We are talking about whose physic is impressive.
Gimme a break.

marcus · « **Reply #8 on:** March 09, 2007, 01:42:43 AM »

Ronnie because he doesn't look human.

Devon97 · « **Reply #9 on:** March 09, 2007, 05:21:34 AM »

Seriously, what exactly is IMPRESSIVE about Coleman? He looks like a bloated toadstool.

GoneAway · « **Reply #10 on:** March 09, 2007, 05:29:03 AM »

Ronnie's legs are more impressive due to size and cuts, but Arnold, to be in the same condition as Ronnie, 30 years prior, is more impressive.

donrhummy · « **Reply #11 on:** March 09, 2007, 09:01:19 AM »

Split about 50-50 so far...

Personally I think Arnold is more impressive. Ronnie's bigger, more muscular, but not as impressive. I see Arnold and I'm blown away by how aesthetically lined his physique is while still being incredibly muscular. Ronnie, on the other hand, doesn't have pleasing shape there and looks a little like a massive mess. Still, it's all just opinion.

kyomu · « **Reply #12 on:** March 09, 2007, 09:05:43 AM »

Whats up with Arnold arnold arnold arnold....!!!
Damn Arnold was not known for his aethtic physic!! He was a mass monster at that age!
Arnold was great but he cant even beat Haney priod!
Look at arnolds hams and glutes!Soft as hell comparing with BBers of now a day.

pumpster · « **Reply #13 on:** March 09, 2007, 09:10:49 AM »

That deliberately misleading comparison reeks of Iron Age quality, with Coleman at a heavier weight. Try comparing them in top shape..

theworm · « **Reply #14 on:** March 09, 2007, 09:12:00 AM »

I think Arnold would look 1000 xs different if he was competing today. I think he looks best back then. If he competed today he would have a gut and look GH-ed up, kinda like Lou at the 1996 Masters..

donrhummy · « **Reply #15 on:** March 09, 2007, 09:53:51 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on March 09, 2007, 09:10:49 AM

That deliberately misleading comparison reeks of Iron Age quality, with Coleman at a heavier weight. Try comparing them in top shape..

Actually, I chose Ronnie from 2003 because a lot of people on here said he was amazing/untouchable that year.

bigbalddaddy · « **Reply #16 on:** March 09, 2007, 09:58:47 AM »

I would like to see Arnold with some wheels of todays competitors! That would intersting to see in a more balanced physique (by todays standards).

Sir William Idol · « **Reply #17 on:** March 09, 2007, 09:59:48 AM »

ronnies is more impressive based on the shock value of his physique, whereas arnolds is more covetable based on aesthetics

bigbalddaddy · « **Reply #18 on:** March 09, 2007, 10:02:10 AM »

Quote from: Sir William Idol on March 09, 2007, 09:59:48 AM

ronnies is more impressive based on the shock value of his physique, whereas arnolds is more covetable based on aesthetics

nice gramar!!!

Sir William Idol · « **Reply #19 on:** March 09, 2007, 10:04:39 AM »

Quote from: bigbalddaddy on March 09, 2007, 10:02:10 AM

nice gramar!!!

are you being facetious or are you insinuating that i've made a gaffe?

donrhummy · « **Reply #20 on:** March 09, 2007, 10:19:37 AM »

Quote from: bigbalddaddy on March 09, 2007, 10:02:10 AM

nice gramar!!!

nice spelling.

LOL

bigbalddaddy · « **Reply #21 on:** March 09, 2007, 10:36:41 AM »

Quote from: Sir William Idol on March 09, 2007, 10:04:39 AM

are you being facetious or are you insinuating that i've made a gaffe?

naw, it was a compliment of which i rarely give out.

bigbalddaddy · « **Reply #22 on:** March 09, 2007, 10:37:35 AM »

Quote from: donrhummy on March 09, 2007, 10:19:37 AM

nice spelling. LOL

take it easy bro, the xanax isn't quite out of my system from last night...

Pollux · « **Reply #23 on:** March 09, 2007, 10:54:47 AM »

Quote from: tweeter on March 09, 2007, 01:16:30 AM

Arnold

Of course!

Danimal77 · « **Reply #24 on:** March 09, 2007, 11:30:21 AM »

I don't know if Lou was all Gh'ed up. He was 320 pounds and bloated from that high weight and btw, he wasn't in the 1996 Masters. The man retired officially in 1994, after his 1992 comeback. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Author Topic: Which is more impressive to you? (Read 4471 times)

Alex23

Mr. Intenseone