Author Topic: Which is more impressive to you?  (Read 4448 times)

theworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4019
  • Getbig!
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #25 on: March 09, 2007, 01:38:10 PM »
your right,,,1994 masters.
you are gay.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #26 on: March 09, 2007, 02:15:15 PM »
sorry  Arnold.
Flower Boy Ran Away

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #27 on: March 09, 2007, 02:20:53 PM »
if ron kept his gut in at all times,,he would look more impressive,,problem is when you carry so much muscle on you its easy to forget things and get sluggish,,common problem now days
fallen angel

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #28 on: March 09, 2007, 02:26:56 PM »
Arnold's successor 8)

The fucker was in a TV show yesterday and he looked HUUUUUGGGEEEEEEEE

he almost didn't fit in the Taxi cab

he looked like he was about 280

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83677
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #29 on: March 09, 2007, 02:28:46 PM »
Sorry Ronnie  ;)

GoneAway

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #30 on: March 09, 2007, 07:45:52 PM »
if ron kept his gut in at all times,,he would look more impressive,,problem is when you carry so much muscle on you its easy to forget things and get sluggish,,common problem now days

Did you keep your gut in better than Ronnie when you competed?

Condor

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Work Hard, Play Hard
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #31 on: March 09, 2007, 07:49:00 PM »
I would much rather look like Arnold.

His look is about as far as most ladies will go.

Meanwhile, Ron pulls some questionable science-enhanced freak.

Cold

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 971
  • Getbig!
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #32 on: March 09, 2007, 07:59:57 PM »
men aren't supposed to be pregnant.

Hell i'd take steve urkel over ronnie coleman.

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #33 on: March 09, 2007, 08:10:53 PM »
Ahnold.
just push some weight!

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #34 on: March 10, 2007, 09:23:58 AM »
This, I think, is at the base of the whole discussion of what BB should be about. Unfortunately, it seems close to evenly split.  :P

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #35 on: March 10, 2007, 09:41:24 AM »
men aren't supposed to be pregnant.

Hell i'd take steve urkel over ronnie coleman.

  Men aren't supposed to have developed glutes, either! And who represents the epitome of gluteal developement? That's right: Coleman. How could he win the men's top physique contest in the World several times by having an ass which dominates his physique from the back is beyond me. :-X

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Condor

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Work Hard, Play Hard
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #36 on: March 10, 2007, 07:26:33 PM »
  Men aren't supposed to have developed glutes, either! And who represents the epitome of gluteal developement? That's right: Coleman. How could he win the men's top physique contest in the World several times by having an ass which dominates his physique from the back is beyond me. :-X

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Yes, and men were not supposed to have fully-developed serratus, trapezius, two-headed biceps,  two heads of the tricep, etc, etc...what's your point?  Bad argument.

GoneAway

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4994
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #37 on: March 10, 2007, 08:06:44 PM »
Men aren't supposed to have developed glutes

According to you, maybe. It's a muscle, so it can be developed. Having a stomach that sticks out so far you look like Junior is another thing. Coleman has both.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #38 on: March 10, 2007, 08:13:48 PM »
the really stupid thing is Sucky's insistance, along with the other guy ND, that coleman's glutes "dominate his physique from the back"... ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

CARTEL

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5213
  • Have a good time, all the time.
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #39 on: March 10, 2007, 08:15:17 PM »
Ain't nothing wrong with having a big ass.

Can't pound a spike with a tack-hammer  ;)

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #40 on: March 10, 2007, 11:04:30 PM »
the really stupid thing is Sucky's insistance, along with the other guy ND, that coleman's glutes "dominate his physique from the back"... ::)

I think the real point should be: who the hell CARES if they have ripped glutes or not. It shouldn't be a factor either way.

Alex23

  • Guest
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #41 on: March 10, 2007, 11:06:49 PM »
The fucker was in a TV show yesterday and he looked HUUUUUGGGEEEEEEEE

he almost didn't fit in the Taxi cab

he looked like he was about 280


Spoke to him last week... he just broke the 290 barrier couple of weeks ago 8)

mikediesel

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 660
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #42 on: March 11, 2007, 12:28:53 AM »
GH gut, nuff said!  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Which is more impressive to you?
« Reply #43 on: March 11, 2007, 01:22:38 AM »
Ronnie in 1998 would beat Arnold's best IMO.